Sorry, AOC — protest culture is un-American

Truth Detector

Well-known member
Contributor
The “right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” is our inheritance.

Correct. The constitution does not say “to protest”. Just as it does not say “separation of church from the state.

The violent agitators in support of criminal aliens don’t have a right to agitate, obstruct law enforcement, impinge on business or disturb fellow citizens peaceful enjoyment.

That is the biggest Democrat and media enabler lie and false narrative.

Sorry, AOC — protest culture is un-American

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez likes to argue that the “whole point” of protesting is to make people “uncomfortable.”

In this as in so much else, the Democratic darling is incorrect.

Debate, dissent, running highly misleading political ads on TV: These are all part of our great tradition of political discourse.

Taking to the streets to disrupt the lives of average citizens is a leftist ideal, not an American one.

It’s antithetical to the highest virtue of republicanism, namely minding your own business.

But decades ago American leftists began conflating “activism” with patriotism, and millions of young people were convinced that protesting is an expression of good citizenry.

These days, caring is often given more reverence than wisdom, knowledge or achievement, let alone patriotic activities like working, getting married and raising kids.

An equally intolerable and parallel notion has also sprung up: It says the rest of us have a patriotic duty to admire anyone who’s “making a difference” or engaged in “participatory democracy,” no matter how insufferable or wrong they are.

And protesters are almost always insufferable and wrong.

Every loudmouth ignoramus with an opinion has a First Amendment right. You’re not special.

Yet modern left-wing protesters believe their passion and anger imbue them with moral license to demand things and speak over their fellow citizens.

Just watch the video of those self-righteous “activists” disrupting church services in St. Paul the other day, or global-warming cultists shutting down traffic in major cities, or college students using their heckler’s veto to disrupt speeches and debates.

As we’ve seen with two recent shootings in Minneapolis, protest culture can have deadly consequences.

Then again, most of these efforts aren’t organic or spontaneous expressions of political anger anymore.

They are well-funded and well-managed by organizations that see political benefit in creating chaos and turning our country into a revolutionary battleground.

From Lenin to Alinsky, forced confrontation has been a tactic of Marxist activism.

Every bully, of course, sees themselves as the embodiment of MLK Jr., though most of them lack dignity and a worthy cause.

It’s amusing hearing these self-aggrandizing activists treat protests as great acts of bravery.

But wake up: You’re not actually living in a fascist state.

Those marching against the clerics in Iran risk their lives.


 
"..to peaceably assemble". :palm:
Nothing peaceful about mobs obstructing Federal law enforcement brainless asshat. :palm:

That doesn't say "protest". Assemble and Protest are two different things brainless asshat. :palm:

assemble

verb
as·sem·ble ə-ˈsem-bəl

1: to bring together (as in a particular place or for a particular purpose)
They assembled a team of experts to solve the problem.

protest
noun
/ˈprəʊ.test/ us /ˈproʊ.test/

a strong complaint expressing disagreement, disapproval, or opposition:
 
Nothing peaceful about mobs obstructing Federal law enforcement brainless asshat. :palm:
AOC didn't say that.
That doesn't say "protest". Assemble and Protest are two different things brainless asshat. :palm:

assemble

verb
as·sem·ble ə-ˈsem-bəl

1: to bring together (as in a particular place or for a particular purpose)
They assembled a team of experts to solve the problem.


protest
noun
/ˈprəʊ.test/ us /ˈproʊ.test/

a strong complaint expressing disagreement, disapproval, or opposition:
A protest is a public expression of objection, disapproval, or dissent against something, like a policy, action, or idea, often through demonstrations, marches, or organized events to influence opinion or policy. Simply put, it's people showing they strongly disagree with something and want change.

:palm:
 
AOC didn't say that.

Where did I indicate she did, you brainless thread troll?

A protest is a public expression of objection, disapproval, or dissent against something, like a policy, action, or idea, often through demonstrations, marches, or organized events to influence opinion or policy. Simply put, it's people showing they strongly disagree with something and want change.

:palm:

As I said, it is not protected speech within the constitution you brainless thread troll.
 
So you just mentioned AOC because it tickled your hairy balls?

You fucking retard, read the article before you engage in your predictably stupid unhinged comments. :palm:

Yes it is. People have the right to peaceably assemble to have their voice heard.

These aren't peacable assmeblies you brainless asshat. Protesting is not peaceful assembly asshat. These are violent efforts to obstruct and interfere with law eforcement actions.

I get why you cannot comprehend the obvious. You lack sufficient grey matter between those big ugly ears. :palm:
 
I do not have enough information to form an opinion about those two.

You don't have enough brains to comprehend much of anything dumbass. :palm:

As to the OP, @Truth Detector made a retarded claim that protesting is not a First Amendment right.

It isn't you brainless asshat. I posted the first amendment; you won't find "protest" in there you brainless asshat. :laugh:
 
You fucking retard, read the article before you engage in your predictably stupid unhinged comments. :palm:
Either she said it or she didn't. Make up your mind.
These aren't peacable assmeblies you brainless asshat. Protesting is not peaceful assembly asshat. These are violent efforts to obstruct and interfere with law eforcement actions.

I get why you cannot comprehend the obvious. You lack sufficient grey matter between those big ugly ears. :palm:
Again, dumbass, who said that violent protest is a First Amendment right? AOC certainly didn't.

You seem worse than usual.
 
Yet, brainless asshats liek you were A OK when the cop shot an unarmed Ashli Babbit. No demand for investigations. No riots in the streets.

Just STFU already. We get it. You're a stupid, hypocritical, clueless retard with the IQ of a lemming.
*Whoosh!* The point went over your head. She was a part of VIOLENT protest. They had no right to do that.
 
Either she said it or she didn't. Make up your mind.

Just go away, you clueless retard. You didn't even read the article or have the brains to comprehend what you read.

Again, dumbass, who said that violent protest is a First Amendment right? AOC certainly didn't.

You seem worse than usual.

I don't think you even know what you are ranting about brainless wonder dunce. Why don't you provide the thread where I triggered you and we can start from there and illustrate what a mentally unhinged moron you really are.
 
Back
Top