Social Security payout to exceed pay-in this year

Remember this guy that ran for president who had this idea about some sort of lockbox or something for Social Security? Whatever happened to him?
 
Remember this guy that ran for president who had this idea about some sort of lockbox or something for Social Security? Whatever happened to him?

He has been busy ripping off the public with his insanity about global seas rising 4 billion feet. All his fear mongering rants continue, despite the fact that so much of his bullshit is now blowing back in his face. Like you, he must enjoy the taste.

That said, the 'lock box' idea would have been better than allowing the idiots in DC to continue 'borrowing' from the trust fund in order to pretend there were 'budget surpluses'. Funny how most Dems still believe that nonsense... that was perpetuated by that very same man and his sheeple.
 
He has been busy ripping off the public with his insanity about global seas rising 4 billion feet. All his fear mongering rants continue, despite the fact that so much of his bullshit is now blowing back in his face. Like you, he must enjoy the taste.

That said, the 'lock box' idea would have been better than allowing the idiots in DC to continue 'borrowing' from the trust fund in order to pretend there were 'budget surpluses'. Funny how most Dems still believe that nonsense... that was perpetuated by that very same man and his sheeple.


Dude, you supported the Bush tax cuts. You have no credibility on the issue.
 
Dude, you supported the Bush tax cuts. You have no credibility on the issue.

You are a fucking moron with no credibility on ANY issue. Yet you are allowed to continue posting your nonsense.

As far as the tax cuts... yes I supported them, but as I have stated countless times, they DO NOT WORK long term without corresponding cuts in spending. But I know, you are going to pretend I have never stated that... right?

The tax cuts ARE stimulus to the economy in the short run, but require spending cuts to be economically feasible in the long run.

Similar to the stimulus this time around. They are stop gaps in the short run, but if you do not have any type of long term solutions as a part of the stimulus then you eventually get back to pissing in the wind.
 
You are a fucking moron with no credibility on ANY issue. Yet you are allowed to continue posting your nonsense.

As far as the tax cuts... yes I supported them, but as I have stated countless times, they DO NOT WORK long term without corresponding cuts in spending. But I know, you are going to pretend I have never stated that... right?

The tax cuts ARE stimulus to the economy in the short run, but require spending cuts to be economically feasible in the long run.

Similar to the stimulus this time around. They are stop gaps in the short run, but if you do not have any type of long term solutions as a part of the stimulus then you eventually get back to pissing in the wind.


Just fucking with you, man. Relax.
 
I would be cool with allowing people who can prove the means to opt out to also be allowed to opt out. If we are going to means test in one way, means testing in another way is valid.

I think that sort of means testing has to be done on a repeating basis. I know people who had lots of money before the burst and lost the bulk of it. But in theory I think that kind of means testing could work well too.
 
Back
Top