Smoking Dem Sues Asbestos Company

Taft2016

Verified User
http://www.businessweek.com/article...-should-withdraw-her-asbestos-related-lawsuit

This morning let’s consider the strange case of Representative Carolyn McCarthy of New York.

Sadly, McCarthy has lung cancer. The 69-year-old Democrat from Long Island took a leave from Congress in June to seek treatment at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in Manhattan. I wish her the best, of course; lung cancer is a tough

McCarthy has decided to cash in on her unfortunate plight by putting herself in the hands of Weitz & Luxenberg. The New York law firm specializes in suing former manufacturers of products containing asbestos, a carcinogenic insulation material. Weitz & Luxenberg has filed suit on McCarthy’s behalf against more than 40 companies, alleging their actions contributed to her often-fatal disease. The suit, reported over the weekend by the New York Post, claims that McCarthy’s exposure as a child to asbestos helped make her sick. She never worked for the defendant companies, which include Goodyear Tire & Rubber (GT), the Con Edison utility, and Pfizer (PFE). Instead, the suit alleges she was exposed to trace amounts of asbestos because her father and brothers worked as boilermakers in U.S. Navy yards and power plants.

The papers filed by Weitz & Luxenberg omit a relevant detail: McCarthy has smoked for some 40 years. “McCarthy is such an avid smoker,” according to the Post, “that she’s known around Capitol Hill for taking [cigarette] breaks between votes.”

Since smoking also causes lung cancer, McCarthy’s decades-long habit will provide the defendants in her case a potentially powerful argument that they’re not legally culpable. Her habit also raises the question of why, at this late date, when we’ve established that asbestos is dangerous and it’s no longer included in any new products, the courts ought to transfer wealth from a bunch of companies to a well-insured, well-compensated federal employee. The good folks at Weitz & Luxenberg, needless to say, will take a healthy cut of any recovery McCarthy might obtain.

Unethical?
 
Asbestos causes a very specific form of lung cancer, mesothelioma. (It didnt specify in the article) Does it also cause any other type of lung cancer?

This case will have to be built on lots of pieces of research and cause....there wont be one specific smoking gun. So things like this ^^^ will just be bricks in the wall.
 
lets say a guy has a car accident that is his fault and ends up with a bad leg.

then he gets a job where that bad leg gets mangled in a work accident and needs amputating.

should he not be allowed to sue?
 
Back
Top