"silencing people is what happens in China" (Nikki Haley)

this is not Trump lover -she's establishment Republican all the way.
For ths alone ( never mind her neocon tendencies) -she'll get my support

The rest of the cowards Republicans can sit on their hands - speaking up is the only way to save free speech
 
this is not Trump lover -she's establishment Republican all the way.
For ths alone ( never mind her neocon tendencies) -she'll get my support

The rest of the cowards Republicans can sit on their hands - speaking up is the only way to save free speech

who gives a fuck what that ho says dipshit

when the theaters open back up walk on in and yell 'fire!'

you're one stupid fuck
 
If this is about twitter, Trump uses it to foment violence and sedition. He should not have any microphone. Free speech is not absolute. Trumps urging violence and sedition is exactly the kind of speech we should not allow.
 
Stop crying, as I just told one of your comrades, the social platforms explained why they banned Trump, after Wednesday, they saw his messages as a potential to inspire violence.

And forget the irrelevant autocratic comparisons, as you Trumpkins love to say, show us in the Constitution where it says someone has the right to tweet

So, they become the arbiters of free speech hum? No trial, no jury, no defense. Simply Off to the internet gulag with you! if you dare offend them. I find their selective outrage outrageous.
 
So, they become the arbiters of free speech hum? No trial, no jury, no defense. Simply Off to the internet gulag with you! if you dare offend them. I find their selective outrage outrageous.

Free speech has limitations, especially incendiary speech obviously designed to foment rebellion

the South lost the Civil War dipshit, deal with it peacefully or STFU
 
Free speech has limitations, especially incendiary speech obviously designed to foment rebellion

the South lost the Civil War dipshit, deal with it peacefully or STFU

Or what? You going to applaud on the modern equivalent of the Brown or Black shirts of the 1930's when they come to enforce it?

Screenshot-2018-08-14-13.42.57.png


You have no problem with "incendiary speech obviously designed to forment (sic) rebellion" when it matches your political views. It's only when it doesn't, that you feign outrage.

Antifa-This-is-War.jpg


maxresdefault1.jpg


335fa1023378e082463efa5ea22bb2fd
 
Stop crying, as I just told one of your comrades, the social platforms explained why they banned Trump, after Wednesday, they saw his messages as a potential to inspire violence.

And forget the irrelevant autocratic comparisons, as you Trumpkins love to say, show us in the Constitution where it says someone has the right to tweet
why did they also ban Sidney Powell ? Michael Flynn ? maria bartiromo? as well?
They wernt there or said anything.
Twitter is fascist, FB not much better -and while it's not a first amendment issue it does act to silence free speech

No matter what your politics, that shows the fascist intent and execution of these platforms
 
So, they become the arbiters of free speech hum? No trial, no jury, no defense. Simply Off to the internet gulag with you! if you dare offend them. I find their selective outrage outrageous.

On their platform, yes, they can become the “arbiters of speech,” book publishers don’t have to print every manuscript someone sends them do they? They gave their reasons, and you may not agree with them, others do, speech has never been absolute
 
why did they also ban Sidney Powell ? Michael Flynn ? maria bartiromo? as well?
They wernt there or said anything.
Twitter is fascist, FB not much better -and while it's not a first amendment issue it does act to silence free speech

No matter what your politics, that shows the fascist intent and execution of these platforms

'free speech' has limitations, why can't you figure that out retard?

also, why do you hate capitalists protecting their businesses?
 
Stop crying, as I just told one of your comrades, the social platforms explained why they banned Trump, after Wednesday, they saw his messages as a potential to inspire violence.

And forget the irrelevant autocratic comparisons, as you Trumpkins love to say, show us in the Constitution where it says someone has the right to tweet

Spin it all you want but silencing is silencing.

The permanent in permanent ban is all you need to know.
 

Fuck Nikki Haley. Just another enabler running for the exit sign.

No one has a right to social media. Don’t play by the rules, you get your ass kicked off and getting kicked off Twitter does not equate to silencing anyone, especially for the POTUS. There are about a zillion mics and podiums he could step up to and tell lies to if he wasn’t such a fucking coward.
 
Back
Top