Senators quickly pass bill to expand security for families of Supreme Court justices

Dutch Uncle

* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Contributor
It surprises me that such security measures weren’t already in place since kidnapping or threatening to murder the family of a Justice is clearly a threat to the Supreme Court.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/09/politics/supreme-court-justices-security-senate-vote/index.html
Senators quickly pass bill to expand security for families of Supreme Court justices
Members of the US Senate passed a bipartisan bill Monday that would expand security protection to the immediate family members of Supreme Court justices, following recent protests at some justices' homes.

The Supreme Court Police Parity Act was approved by unanimous consent, meaning no senators objected to its quick passage. The legislation must also be passed by the House before going to President Joe Biden's desk for his signature.
The push in Congress comes one week after Politico's bombshell leaked draft of an opinion, which indicated the Court is poised to overturn Roe v. Wade as soon as next month.
 
The favorability of SCOTUS has dropped dramatically in the past few years. It’s one thing to distrust politicians since most are liars catering to their campaign donors and often working for their own interests in violation of their oaths, but it’s another thing to distrust the highest court in the land. We get the government we deserve.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/354908/approval-supreme-court-down-new-low.aspx
Approval of U.S. Supreme Court Down to 40%, a New Low
Americans' opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court have worsened, with 40%, down from 49% in July, saying they approve of the job the high court is doing. This represents, by two percentage points, a new low in Gallup's trend, which dates back to 2000. The poll was conducted shortly after the Supreme Court declined to block a controversial Texas abortion law. In August, the court similarly allowed college vaccine mandates to proceed and rejected a Biden administration attempt to extend a federal moratorium on evictions during the pandemic.

These latest findings, from Gallup's annual Governance survey conducted Sept. 1-17, come little more than a year after 58% of Americans approved of the Supreme Court, among the highest readings in the trend.
okrvsdk8iusfn1qu53z_vg.png
 
fifty years since the court decided Roe v Wade and not once were threats made against justices.......hours after word goes out it might be reversed and threats materialize.......

oddly, people say conservatives and lib'ruls are all alike.......
 
It surprises me that such security measures weren’t already in place since kidnapping or threatening to murder the family of a Justice is clearly a threat to the Supreme Court.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/09/politics/supreme-court-justices-security-senate-vote/index.html
Senators quickly pass bill to expand security for families of Supreme Court justices
Members of the US Senate passed a bipartisan bill Monday that would expand security protection to the immediate family members of Supreme Court justices, following recent protests at some justices' homes.

The Supreme Court Police Parity Act was approved by unanimous consent, meaning no senators objected to its quick passage. The legislation must also be passed by the House before going to President Joe Biden's desk for his signature.
The push in Congress comes one week after Politico's bombshell leaked draft of an opinion, which indicated the Court is poised to overturn Roe v. Wade as soon as next month.

and the threats are from the left or the right?
 
The favorability of SCOTUS has dropped dramatically in the past few years. It’s one thing to distrust politicians since most are liars catering to their campaign donors and often working for their own interests in violation of their oaths, but it’s another thing to distrust the highest court in the land. We get the government we deserve.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/354908/approval-supreme-court-down-new-low.aspx
Approval of U.S. Supreme Court Down to 40%, a New Low

okrvsdk8iusfn1qu53z_vg.png

Well..I guess they need to worry about that when they come up for reelection. :rolleyes:
 
fifty years since the court decided Roe v Wade and not once were threats made against justices.......hours after word goes out it might be reversed and threats materialize.......

oddly, people say conservatives and lib'ruls are all alike.......
Threats? Wow. Over 230 years since the Constitution was ratified and January 2021 was the first violent attempted coup because Pedo Don followers didn’t like the results of a free and fair election.

BTW, the two parties are alike since both are supported by cucks, cunts and criminals who seek to impose their views upon all Americans.

5dx5qq.gif

5dx6xg.gif

4tr1dv.gif
 
fifty years since the court decided Roe v Wade and not once were threats made against justices.......hours after word goes out it might be reversed and threats materialize.......

oddly, people say conservatives and lib'ruls are all alike.......

People fight the hardest for their rights. A woman has a fundamental right to her own body and its functions. Nobody else has any rights over her body and its functions at all.

See how dumb you are ?
 
Did the Pedo Party deceive Americans during the nomination of Justices? Did they lie under oath? I have no doubt Kavanaugh lied under oath about his past but am less sure if he perjured himself about Roe v. Wade.

If so, this this explains why more and more Americans are putting the Supreme Court on the same level as Congressmen and used car salesmen.

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/05/w...rett-said-about-roe-at-confirmation-hearings/
What Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett Said About Roe at Confirmation Hearings
In the wake of the leaked Supreme Court draft opinion that indicates the court could overturn Roe v. Wade, some lawmakers have charged that conservative Supreme Court justices led them astray during Senate confirmation hearings. We’ll look at what the three most recent conservative justices had said about Roe.

The draft opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, reportedly had the support of Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, according to Politico, which published the draft on May 2. The latter three of those justices were all nominated by then-President Donald Trump. The court has confirmed the authenticity of the draft, but said it didn’t represent “the final position” of any justice.

Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand told CNN that conservative justices “misled the Senate, with the intention of getting their confirmation vote, with the intention of overruling Roe.” She added that “they would purposefully create the impression that they would not overrule settled precedent, and that it was not only deserving of due weight and the importance of precedent, but because it had been reaffirmed, that it deserves more weight.”

Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu said in a May 7 tweet: “Multiple Supreme Court Justices lied during their confirmation process about their view of #RoeVWade and stare decisis. Those are the facts.” (Stare decisis, Latin for “to stand by things decided,” is a legal doctrine that courts generally follow when ruling on a similar case.)

Republican Sens. Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, both supporters of abortion rights, also have said the opinion goes against what justices had said.
 
Threats? Wow. Over 230 years since the Constitution was ratified and January 2021 was the first violent attempted coup because Pedo Don followers didn’t like the results of a free and fair election.

BTW, the two parties are alike since both are supported by cucks, cunts and criminals who seek to impose their views upon all Americans.

5dx5qq.gif

5dx6xg.gif

4tr1dv.gif

lol.

everyone knows 1/6 is mostly fake news.
 
lol.

everyone knows 1/6 is mostly fake news.

LOL. “Everyone” meaning Pedo Don’s cucks, cunts and criminals. :laugh:

BTW, did you see the Oath Breakers were rolling over against Pedo Don? Awesome! :thup:

https://www.military.com/daily-news...epers-leaders-military-records-dont-back.html
…copy of his Army retirement paperwork reviewed by Military.com reveals previously undisclosed details about Rhodes' career that show a soldier who served quietly and relatively unremarkably, despite the central role his military career plays in the fabric of the Oath Keepers. He was honorably separated from the Army after serving two years and seven months on active duty, leaving at the rank of specialist with a "temporary" physical disability, according to the document.

The Jan. 6 plot that his group hatched, as outlined in federal charges that have led to three guilty pleas from other Oath Keepers, leaned heavily on what they believed were elite military tactics. Militia members stored weapons across Northern Virginia, and "quick reaction force" teams were ready to storm the Capitol on Rhodes' orders. The court report referenced the Oath Keepers' use of a "stack" method, a military room-clearing formation that experts have pointed to as evidence of the Oath Keepers' inflated sense of capability.

Rhodes has pleaded not guilty to the sedition charges.

Over half of the Oath Keepers arrested that January -- including Rhodes -- had prior military service, something that Rhodes actively sought in public recruiting pitches that leaned on his own background.

"We need prior military, LEO, security professionals, skilled martial artists, emergency medical, communications, and intelligence personnel," wrote Rhodes in an archived blog post titled "Oath Keepers Deploying to DC to Protect Events, Speakers, & Attendees on Jan 5-6: Time to Stand!" posted two days before the attack on the Capitol.

"On your feet!" he wrote in November 2020 in a call to march on D.C. after the 2020 presidential election. "Stand up, hook up, check equipment ... and shuffle to the door my brothers and sisters," he added -- a reference to airborne military procedures, ones he experienced himself more than three decades ago. He signed off the blog post, in part, as both "Founder of Oath Keepers" and "U.S. Army Airborne disabled veteran."

Those messages were consistent with Rhodes' angle since founding the Oath Keepers in 2009. He used prior military service, including his own, as a rallying call to his members, actively recruiting veterans, requesting their own military records, and instilling a quasi-military culture in his acolytes by requiring militia members to take a reinterpreted version of the military oath of enlistment -- the result of which led many to the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Tasha Adams, Rhodes' estranged wife, said in an interview that, when she met Rhodes in 1991, five years after he was separated from the Army, he was assertive and intelligent, but unsatisfied with how short his military career was.

"He identified heavily [with the military] even then," she said. "He wasn't happy that he wasn't able to be a career military person still, even years later."

So far, six of the 11 January arrestees tied to the Oath Keepers plot have confirmed military service, consistent with the militia's propensity to recruit military and law enforcement veterans. Rhodes even requests a DD-214 -- an official document that gives a summary of a service member's time in uniform -- from potential recruits, according to the Oath Keepers' website.

Andrew Mines, a research fellow at The George Washington University's Program on Extremism who focuses on those with military experience at the Capitol insurrection, told Military.com "the legitimacy that he brings to the movement when he tries to claim the prestige of our military is definitely outsized."
 
Threats? Wow. Over 230 years since the Constitution was ratified and January 2021 was the first violent attempted coup because Pedo Don followers didn’t like the results of a free and fair election.

BTW, the two parties are alike since both are supported by cucks, cunts and criminals who seek to impose their views upon all Americans.

5dx5qq.gif

5dx6xg.gif

4tr1dv.gif

No, libs, the Jan. 6 events weren’t a ‘coup’


It wasn’t the “worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War.” Nor did it veer anywhere near the vicinity of being as dangerous as 9/11. Nor was it a “coup” or an “insurrection” — not in any way we commonly understand those words. It wasn’t a “putsch.” Nor did it, as the chairman of the Jan. 6 committee, Rep. Bennie Thompson, claimed, come “dangerously close to succeeding” in upending “American democracy.” That’s all a myth. It was a riot. Or, as Christopher Caldwell more forgivingly called it in The New York Times, perhaps “a politica


https://nypost.com/2021/07/30/no-libs-the-jan-6-events-werent-a-coup/
 
No, libs, the Jan. 6 events weren’t a ‘coup’

It wasn’t the “worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War.” Nor did it veer anywhere near the vicinity of being as dangerous as 9/11. Nor was it a “coup” or an “insurrection” — not in any way we commonly understand those words. It wasn’t a “putsch.” Nor did it, as the chairman of the Jan. 6 committee, Rep. Bennie Thompson, claimed, come “dangerously close to succeeding” in upending “American democracy.” That’s all a myth. It was a riot. Or, as Christopher Caldwell more forgivingly called it in The New York Times, perhaps “a politica


https://nypost.com/2021/07/30/no-libs-the-jan-6-events-werent-a-coup/
Time will tell. The good news is that you are such a loud mouthed chickenshit you’ll be safe at home while they go to prison. LOL
 
People fight the hardest for their rights. A woman has a fundamental right to her own body and its functions. Nobody else has any rights over her body and its functions at all.

See how dumb you are ?
I guess I'm dumb enough to think people should not be allowed to kill their children.....now if you disagree with that, how dumb are you?.....
 
Back
Top