Senate passes bill to give police protection to families of Supreme Court justices

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Good, the Democratic majority is protecting our government.

I believe in the right to protest. I believe protesters have a right to protest at the homes of S.Ct. Justices, but I don’t think they should.

Families should be left alone.
 
Jarod said:
Good, the Democratic majority is protecting our government.

I believe in the right to protest. I believe protesters have a right to protest at the homes of S.Ct. Justices, but I don’t think they should.

Families should be left alone.
Click to expand...
Yes, and women’s right to privacy in their healthcare should be left alone as well, but Alito feels he can overturn 50 years of precedent, people become passionate. The protest if peaceful, should not be prohibited. If they become violent, then action can be taken. I doubt Alito and his family are in harms way.
 
Phantasmal said:
Yes, and women’s right to privacy in their healthcare should be left alone as well, but Alito feels he can overturn 50 years of precedent, people become passionate. The protest if peaceful, should not be prohibited. If they become violent, then action can be taken. I doubt Alito and his family are in harms way.
Click to expand...


I agree 100%
 
But… if I were in charge I would protest at the homes… If I had enough people I might intentionally clog traffic into an out of the city for days, but I would not go to the homes of the justices.
 
Phantasmal said:
Yes, and women’s right to privacy in their healthcare should be left alone as well, but Alito feels he can overturn 50 years of precedent, people become passionate. The protest if peaceful, should not be prohibited. If they become violent, then action can be taken. I doubt Alito and his family are in harms way.
Click to expand...

They might be though if they *don't* overturn Roe v Wade. If they'll kill physicians who perform abortions, and blow up clinics, they won't care about taking out a justice or three.
 
Jarod said:
But… if I were in charge I would protest at the homes… If I had enough people I might intentionally clog traffic into an out of the city for days, but I would not go to the homes of the justices.
Click to expand...

What homes would you protest at?
 
Jarod said:
But… if I were in charge I would protest at the homes… If I had enough people I might intentionally clog traffic into an out of the city for days, but I would not go to the homes of the justices.
Click to expand...
I prefer they don’t, but not everyone can make it to the steps of the Supreme Court. I, myself, would not organize a protest at private homes, but I do understand why they do it.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
They might be though if they *don't* overturn Roe v Wade. If they'll kill physicians who perform abortions, and blow up clinics, they won't care about taking out a justice or three.
Click to expand...

This is a good point. They are more likely to be in harms way if they don't overturn it.
 
Phantasmal said:
I prefer they don’t, but not everyone can make it to the steps of the Supreme Court. I, myself, would not organize a protest at private homes, but I do understand why they do it.
Click to expand...

They are behaving much better than those who protested at the House on January 6th, so far. I hope they keep it that way.
 
Jarod said:
They are behaving much better than those who protested at the House on January 6th, so far. I hope they keep it that way.
Click to expand...
I do as well, the trouble in LA started when one of the DHS officers pushed a protestor. I still don’t condone any violence, but officers have to learn they can’t touch people, if they are t breaking the law.
 
Phantasmal said:
I do as well, the trouble in LA started when one of the DHS officers pushed a protestor. I still don’t condone any violence, but officers have to learn they can’t touch people, if they are t breaking the law.
Click to expand...

Lots of officers have a lot to learn about individuals rights.

I recently got one suspended, she still might be fired, after she pulled her gun when I refused to roll down my un-tinted rear window.
 
Jarod said:
Good, the Democratic majority is protecting our government.

I believe in the right to protest. I believe protesters have a right to protest at the homes of S.Ct. Justices, but I don’t think they should.

Families should be left alone.
Click to expand...

What the insurrectionist mobs trying to "to influence, intimidate, or impede" the justices are doing is against the law.

ALL of the criminally threatening insurrectionists there "to influence, intimidate, or impede" the SCOTUS Justices are in clear violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1503.

I was under the impression that the Leftists in our country opposed insurrection. What happened to the Leftist outrage against insurrection?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1503
<snip>
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States,
<snip>
shall be punished
<snip>

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1503
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top