SCOTUS wife cheers Rioters

Thomas is the same. His wife arranges and speaks to far-right anti-American groups. Clarence speaks at them. He is a pro-Trump, pro insurrectionist and a terrible justice.

Well we need to remove him for cavorting with the nations enemies
 
Hello evince,



No she didn't.

Read the link you posted.

She sent her last message prior to the siege.

There were no messages after the violence erupted.

Her FB page has been taken down.

I agree that her politics are messed up, that she is supporting the wrong side, supporting bullies who do wrong.

But I am not clear on how he should be responsible for her attitudes.

The issue is thus:

Is an individual legally responsible for the actions of his or her spouse?

Should an individual lose his or her job and profession because of something his or her spouse said?

I know this answer is not going to be what you want to hear, but I cannot agree with either of those.

Based on the Constitution.



They were known racist groups



He needs to denounce her praise of evil seditious fools
 
Hello evince,



No she didn't.

Read the link you posted.

She sent her last message prior to the siege.

There were no messages after the violence erupted.

Her FB page has been taken down.

I agree that her politics are messed up, that she is supporting the wrong side, supporting bullies who do wrong.

But I am not clear on how he should be responsible for her attitudes.

The issue is thus:

Is an individual legally responsible for the actions of his or her spouse?

Should an individual lose his or her job and profession because of something his or her spouse said?

I know this answer is not going to be what you want to hear, but I cannot agree with either of those.

Based on the Constitution.


My apologies

You were correct

She erased them after they started killing people
 
Hello evince,

They were known racist groups



He needs to denounce her praise of evil seditious fools

Agreed. That's what a good person would do.

A good person caught in a scandal resigns out of respect for the office held. Like Al Franken.

A bad person caught in a scandal denies it, attacks others, and defiantly remains in office and retains power. Like Trump. Like Thomas.

So we don't want bad people in office.

And that is why it is so important that we have a functional government and the well informed, actively engaged, respectful, effectively communicating populace necessary to support it. Since being bitterly divided prevents that, it is imperative that we strive to communicate our views with others on the basis of mutual respect.
 
Hello evince,

But in light of this other circumstance he will have to resign or be removed

Agreed. SCOTUS justices should not be taking political sides.

If he was a good person like Al Franken he would resign.

I don't think he is.

And I don't think there is any law which could be the basis for an impeachment.
 
Clarence Thomas is Black, you racist.

These are her posts:

I spit in the face of the black guy.
Obama was nothing more than another black failure in a government job and another black family in government housing. Stupid nigger.
If you're black and you vote democrat, then you're a "nigger". If you're white and you vote democrat, then you're "white trash". If you're Asian and you vote democrat, then you're a "zipper head". If you're Hispanic and you vote democrat, then you're a "wetback".
 
Back
Top