SCOTUS backs Pennsylvania redisctricting

[evince]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/u...ricting/ar-BBKr08A?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

 

[evince]

next election will not be using the republican political districting

 

[evince]

these cases are not moving forward huh


the SCOTUS cant take them


they would have to strike the gerrymandering down as unconstitutional

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Wrong. Not hearing a case means they gave NO OPINION.

Why do you always lie?

 

[Flash]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/u...ricting/ar-BBKr08A?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

Technically, the Supreme Court does not back or support the lower court decision. It just chooses not to hear the case and so the lower court decision stands. It has the same effect as supporting it but it could decide to hear a different redistricting case later and rule differently.

 

[evince]

they let it stand

that means they are fine with the redistricting going through


that is the result of them not picking this case to view


No immediate damage to avoid by taking up this case

 

[evince]

this means fewer republicans in congress

thank goodness