Science Theologians

AssHatZombie said:
Different Huxley, dumbass. Being ignorant is not a good argument.
Click to expand...

Then maybe you should clarify which Huxley you are talking about. Thomas the Anatomist and contemporary of Darwin or his nephews Julian the evolutionary Biologist and first President of Unesco, Andrew the Nobel Laurete in Physiology or Aldous the novelist?
 
Last edited:
Mottleydude said:
Then maybe you should clarify which Huxley you are talking about. Thomas the Anatomist and contemporary of Darwin or his nephews Julian the evolutionary Biologist and first President of Unesco, Andrew the Nobel Laurete in Physiology or Aldous the novelist?
Click to expand...

Or maybe you should just check the link youself, asswipe.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Or maybe you should just check the link youself, asswipe.
Click to expand...

He is talking about Julian.

Asshat, you don't really believe that any significant portion of the scientific community goes along with that eugenics garbage, do you?

I mean, in this thread you talk like the bulk of all scientific endeavors are focused on killing people.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Yes. I do.


Yes. They are.
Click to expand...

So the government is out to get you. Scientists are out to get you. The jews rule the world and are keeping you down. Christians are just pawns for the jews. Big business and the financial world is for only the very wealthy, and uses you for labor.



Not much in the way of goodtimes in your life, is there?
 
Solitary said:
So the government is out to get you. Scientists are out to get you. The jews rule the world and are keeping you down. Christians are just pawns for the jews. Big business and the financial world is for only the very wealthy, and uses you for labor.



Not much in the way of goodtimes in your life, is there?
Click to expand...

Well. I still have self-touching.:)
 
absolute proof...no...on either side

so wait until you are dead and then you will know...maybe

oat, theories are a result of observation and have more evidence on their side

oat, faith has very little 'evidence'

however, mental science can deliver and has
 
DonQuixote said:
absolute proof...no...on either side

so wait until you are dead and then you will know...maybe

oat, theories are a result of observation and have more evidence on their side

oat, faith has very little 'evidence'

however, mental science can deliver and has
Click to expand...
But this debate is really about valuing human life. Though scientists claim science is unequipped to handle such questions, they still get bent out of shape about assertions that life is valuable.
 
Solitary said:
He is talking about Julian.

Asshat, you don't really believe that any significant portion of the scientific community goes along with that eugenics garbage, do you?

I mean, in this thread you talk like the bulk of all scientific endeavors are focused on killing people.
Click to expand...

He's just a delusional paranoid that believes what he wants to. He's convienantly ignored that when eugenics was first postulated biologist were the very first to reject it. Eugenics was and always has been the forte of right wing politicos.
 
AssHatZombie said:
But this debate is really about valuing human life. Though scientists claim science is unequipped to handle such questions, they still get bent out of shape about assertions that life is valuable.
Click to expand...

Site me a specific instance of this in a scientific context?

You're sounding like a paranoid version of Dixie. Though certainly a less verbose one and for that we give you high praise indeed!!

At least when we give you shit you take it fairly well and don't bombard us with 16 pages of empty rhetoric....and this is a good thing! :)

Though in the interest of honesty I still must state that I think your wacked.
 
Mottleydude said:
Site me a specific instance of this in a scientific context?

You're sounding like a paranoid version of Dixie. Though certainly a less verbose one and for that we give you high praise indeed!!

At least when we give you shit you take it fairly well and don't bombard us with 16 pages of empty rhetoric....and this is a good thing! :)

Though in the interest of honesty I still must state that I think your wacked.
Click to expand...

You show me some scientists AGAINST population control. That will be more fun.
 
AssHatZombie said:
You show me some scientists AGAINST population control. That will be more fun.
Click to expand...

Have you ever studied ecology? Scientist are neither for nor against population control. Nature has it's own ways of controling populations, of any species, that over populate and outstrip its food sources.

Scientist may advocate sustained development but what is irrational about that?
 
Mottleydude said:
Have you ever studied ecology? Scientist are neither for nor against population control. Nature has it's own ways of controling populations, of any species, that over populate and outstrip its food sources.

Scientist may advocate sustained development but what is irrational about that?
Click to expand...
They're for it.

It's not irrational, it's murderous, and anti-human in the ultimate conclusions it leads to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top