Science knowledge has no effect on Republican beliefs

I can back you up. Na indeed appears on the periodic table of elements.

Is milagro just an ad hom guy who poses or does he add content?

Well done, you've naturally gravitated to the board psycho. Birds of a feather...

Sent from Lenovo K6 Note
 
Last edited:
Oh good grief are you for real? I was being sarcastic ffs, dropping sodium into water is something they teach to 13 year olds over here. I was taking the piss out of your college chemistry lab work but it obviously just went straight over your head!!

Sent from Lenovo K6 Note

You'd better rally your mates! At least the "board psycho" doesn't respond twice to each of my posts unaware.:good4u:

I thought you English were dry. You aren't too quick on the uptake.

As much as I doubt anyone here is possessed of amazing brain power, not for a minute did I think that the recent exchanges all round were other than jest. Incidentally, my family on wife's side are from London and Coventry. They just came to the USA to get wealthy and break out of the doddering slumberton, and judging by their circumstance compared to the natives, they did.
 
You'd better rally your mates! At least the "board psycho" doesn't respond twice to each of my posts unaware.:good4u:

I thought you English were dry. You aren't too quick on the uptake.

As much as I doubt anyone here is possessed of amazing brain power, not for a minute did I think that the recent exchanges all round were other than jest. Incidentally, my family on wife's side are from London and Coventry. They just came to the USA to get wealthy and break out of the doddering slumberton, and judging by their circumstance compared to the natives, they did.
Hmm, you seem to be very slow on the uptake and not very imbued with the concepts of scientific methodology and falsification. I suggest that you read Richard Feynman's 1974 Caltech lecture on Cargo Cult Science.

http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/2/CargoCult.htm

Sent from Lenovo K6 Note
 
Note to all you climate scientologists, here is the scientific method in a form simple enough even for Desh to understand. Very few climate related papers adhere to these basic criteria, that's just a fact.

ee4624a790abea57b24e2b2b7fe37d7b.jpg


Sent from my Samsung Note 10
 
Last edited:
Note to all you climate scientologists, here is the scientific method in a form simple enough even for Desh to understand. Very few climate related papers adhere to these basic criteria, that's just a fact.

ee4624a790abea57b24e2b2b7fe37d7b.jpg


Sent from my Samsung Note 10

How sad for you that your preferred outcome is losing the battle in all scientific circles.
 
for what reason would scientists ALL OVER THE WORLD fake science to attack oil companies?


it doesn't even make sense

what dupes
 
for what reason would scientists ALL OVER THE WORLD fake science to attack oil companies?


it doesn't even make sense

what dupes

Good point. Most all the contrarian heterodoxy of the right (and the volume of that crap has increased markedly since the Tea Bagger phenomenon hijacked their party) requires acceptance of complicated conspiracy theories the more questions you ask of them. Climate change denial is a prime one, Birtherism another. All you ever really need to ask is who the heck benefits if their outdated ideas are accepted. Usually the answer is the landed, monied, private or corporate interests. Who benefits if we accept the scientists conclusions at face value? All of humanity and the entire planet at large. That's why it really is not hyperbolic to conclude that Republicans represent evil. Basically, they have wrong and evil ideas.
 
Back
Top