Scalia is a scumbag racist slimeball

S

signalmankenneth

Verified User
scalia-bafagu.jpg

"And I don't care who fucking knows it..."

[SIZE=+1] Link
[/SIZE][SIZE=+1]
Civil rights leaders are up in arms over Tony "Three Fingers" Scalia's skeptical questions about a
key portion of the Voting Rights Act, a cornerstone of the civil rights movement that brought an
end to Jim Crow-era racial discrimination at the polls in the South, pissing off sonservatives

Scalia, a stalwart of the court's racist right wing, suggested that the Voting Rights Act was overwhelmingly
reauthorized in 2006 by Congress because Republicans were afraid to oppose a "racial entitlement."

Scalia said that each time the Voting Rights Act has been reauthorized in the past 50 years, more and more
senators supported it, even though the problem of racial discrimination at the polls has decreased over that time.
"Now, I don't think that's attributable to the fact that it is so much clearer now that we need this," he said.
"I think it is very likely attributable to a phenomenon that is called perpetuation of racial entitlement. When a
society adopts racial entitlements, it is very difficult to get out of them through the normal political processes."

[SIZE=+1]B[/SIZE]art
[/SIZE]

scalia-berlusconi.jpg
 
signalmankenneth said:
scalia-bafagu.jpg

"And I don't care who fucking knows it..."

[SIZE=+1] Link
[/SIZE][SIZE=+1]
Civil rights leaders are up in arms over Tony "Three Fingers" Scalia's skeptical questions about a
key portion of the Voting Rights Act, a cornerstone of the civil rights movement that brought an
end to Jim Crow-era racial discrimination at the polls in the South, pissing off sonservatives

Scalia, a stalwart of the court's racist right wing, suggested that the Voting Rights Act was overwhelmingly
reauthorized in 2006 by Congress because Republicans were afraid to oppose a "racial entitlement."

Scalia said that each time the Voting Rights Act has been reauthorized in the past 50 years, more and more
senators supported it, even though the problem of racial discrimination at the polls has decreased over that time.
"Now, I don't think that's attributable to the fact that it is so much clearer now that we need this," he said.
"I think it is very likely attributable to a phenomenon that is called perpetuation of racial entitlement. When a
society adopts racial entitlements, it is very difficult to get out of them through the normal political processes."

[SIZE=+1]B[/SIZE]art
[/SIZE]

scalia-berlusconi.jpg
Click to expand...

i already posted this on app...dq
 
At least as far as racial entitlements go I agree with him. You don't fix racism/descrimination by providing your own brand of it, you make it equal by not showing bias.
 
pisskop said:
At least as far as racial entitlements go I agree with him. You don't fix racism/descrimination by providing your own brand of it, you make it equal by not showing bias.
Click to expand...

the idea is to permit people to vote in areas where there is a history (and current) of devices to prevent segments of society to vote

since voting is constitutionally guaranteed, how is making it easier for people to vote an 'entitlement' of one group or any group for that matter
 
I read the link, and I didn't see any overt racism. . .

In fact, wasn't Alabama saying it fixed its racist issue?

I grabbed a friends phone, looked it over. its a blog, clearly biased in one way or another, and I don't quite understand what\how this law works. . . so I can't make an opinion on this.

Perhaps I posted in haste based off your post. . .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top