Sarah's history lesson

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
G

Guns Guns Guns

Guest
“He who warned uh, the British that they weren’t gonna be takin’ away our arms, uh by ringing those bells, and um, makin’ sure as he’s riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be sure and we were going to be free, and we were going to be armed.”



http://www.politicususa.com/en/sarah-palin-paul-revere
 
Can you imagine this moron meeting world leaders? Can you imagine her discussing foreign policy .. ANY policy with Angela Merckel? Hu Jin Tao? I doubt she could hold her own with Tiny Tim as they tripped through the tulips!!!
 
the tea party doesn't support sarah. that's the faux tea party you're thinking of.

Real tea party people support Ron Paul.

End the FED
 
tinfoil said:
the tea party doesn't support sarah. that's the faux tea party you're thinking of.

Real tea party people support Ron Paul.

End the FED
Click to expand...

There is no such thing as a real tea partier. They are all caricatures of real people.
 
Lowaicue said:
Can you imagine this moron meeting world leaders? Can you imagine her discussing foreign policy .. ANY policy with Angela Merckel? Hu Jin Tao? I doubt she could hold her own with Tiny Tim as they tripped through the tulips!!!
Click to expand...

after Bush and Obama?.......they would consider it an improvement......
 
Return of Dune said:
There is no such thing as a real tea partier. They are all caricatures of real people.
Click to expand...

liberals are complete hypocrites from their positions of less that a decade ago. Hilarious. And you think simple little name calling make a difference? The real people who identify with the popular perception of what it means to be supportive of the tea party are hard working and honest people looking for a party that's not hijacked by puppets of global banks and corporations. these were things liberals decried a short while ago. Now it seems, they feel as long as the president is a liberal, war and authoritarianism is a good thing.

Sad fucking times we're in.
 
tinfoil said:
liberals are complete hypocrites from their positions of less that a decade ago. Hilarious. And you think simple little name calling make a difference? The real people who identify with the popular perception of what it means to be supportive of the tea party are hard working and honest people looking for a party that's not hijacked by puppets of global banks and corporations. these were things liberals decried a short while ago. Now it seems, they feel as long as the president is a liberal, war and authoritarianism is a good thing.

Sad fucking times we're in.
Click to expand...

The honest ones among them should seperate themselves from the tea party as quickly as possible, since they have been duped.
 
Return of Dune said:
The honest ones among them should seperate themselves from the tea party as quickly as possible, since they have been duped.
Click to expand...

That there are people in America, roaming free, working in factories or serving in the army, that have been duped by a moron, is cause for great concern.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I'm saying an organ grinder's pet monkey would be better......
Click to expand...

So you do not believe that a reasonable intelligence is an important factor when choosing a president?

Tell me, dear boy, as you appear to be suggesting that Obama is not too hot, what would you prefer him to do and if he doesn't do it, do you think you have the requisite talents to be president? So far you have hidden your superior intellect very well. You shouldn't hide it. Bring it out - let us all see it.
 
Lowaicue said:
So you do not believe that a reasonable intelligence is an important factor when choosing a president?

Tell me, dear boy, as you appear to be suggesting that Obama is not too hot, what would you prefer him to do and if he doesn't do it, do you think you have the requisite talents to be president? So far you have hidden your superior intellect very well. You shouldn't hide it. Bring it out - let us all see it.
Click to expand...

First of all, Obama is a highly educated Harvard man, Bush was educated at both Harvard and Yale. They are arguably two of the worst presidents in modern history.... so much for the theory that smart men are better for the job. What's even more interesting, Washington and Lincoln, arguably two of our greatest presidents of all time, never attended college. Michelle Bachmann has more foreign policy experience than Carter, Reagan, Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama combined. So is that your 'measure' of what makes a president great?
 
Dixie said:
First of all, Obama is a highly educated Harvard man, Bush was educated at both Harvard and Yale. They are arguably two of the worst presidents in modern history.... so much for the theory that smart men are better for the job. What's even more interesting, Washington and Lincoln, arguably two of our greatest presidents of all time, never attended college. Michelle Bachmann has more foreign policy experience than Carter, Reagan, Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama combined. So is that your 'measure' of what makes a president great?
Click to expand...



Michele "Batshit" Bachmann thinks the 'shot heard 'round the world' was fired in New Hampshire. What a fucking brainiac.



MicheleBachmannBlack.jpg
​
 
Dixie said:
First of all, Obama is a highly educated Harvard man, Bush was educated at both Harvard and Yale. They are arguably two of the worst presidents in modern history.... so much for the theory that smart men are better for the job. What's even more interesting, Washington and Lincoln, arguably two of our greatest presidents of all time, never attended college. Michelle Bachmann has more foreign policy experience than Carter, Reagan, Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama combined. So is that your 'measure' of what makes a president great?
Click to expand...

My measure of what a president of the USA should or should not be is irrelevant.
I see a string of presidents from Eisenhower to Clinton who somehow managed to keep America at the forefront of world politics. I see perhaps the most stupid man ever to be manipulated into the position, bush, destroy decades of good and not so good management in eight short years. And I see one, undoubtedly, smart and intelligent man who has devoted much of his life to his country and who had no dynastic backing doing his best to claw back some of the respect and foreign trade destroyed by GWBush.
We honestly watch in wonder at the ridiculous attempts to unseat a man who has, in two years, earned back much of the respect of the world.
Now there is a sort of parallel here with Thatcher of the UK. Overseas the creature was adored but she did more to divide the United Kingdom than any leader before or since (although the latest incumbent is doing his best to bring in the same divisive policies, but without the support of an American president).
I guess we can't have both overseas and home popularity. But believe me, and perhaps you are not fully aware of this, bush really did screw up your overseas relations. I am sure you realise that without exports your economy cannot prosper. Obama's policies, if you allow them, will make your country more successful. Nothing to do with republicanism or democat - ism.
Your priorities must be foreign trade. Not abortions, same sex marriages, gun ownership. These should not be in the political arena.
Do you honestly consider that you country was better after eight years of bush than it was before? Honestly?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top