Sarah Palin: But… Wait… The Good Guys Won’t Win With More Crony Capitalism

Timshel

New member
http://www.youngcons.com/sarah-palin-but-wait-the-good-guys-wont-win-with-more-crony-capitalism/

I am ecstatic for Carrier employees! Their bosses just decided to keep shop onshore. What a relief for hundreds of workers. Merry Christmas Indiana!


We don’t yet know terms of the public/private deal that was cut to make the company stay, but let’s hope every business is equally incentivized to keep Americans working in America.


Foundational to our exceptional nation’s sacred private property rights, a business must have freedom to locate where it wishes. In a free market, if a business makes a mistake (including a marketing mistake that perhaps Carrier executives made), threatening to move elsewhere claiming efficiency’s sake, then the market’s invisible hand punishes. Thankfully, that same hand rewards, based on good business decisions.


But this time-tested truth assumes we’re operating on a level playing field.


When government steps in arbitrarily with individual subsidies, favoring one business over others, it sets inconsistent, unfair, illogical precedent. Meanwhile, the invisible hand that best orchestrates a free people’s free enterprise system gets amputated. Then, special interests creep in and manipulate markets. Republicans oppose this, remember? Instead, we support competition on a level playing field, remember? Because we know special interest crony capitalism is one big fail.


Politicians picking and choosing recipients of corporate welfare is railed against by fiscal conservatives, for it’s a hallmark of corruption. And socialism. The Obama Administration dealt in it in spades. Recall Solyndra, Stimulus boondoggles, and all their other taxpayer-subsidized anchors on our economy. A $20 trillion debt-ridden country can’t afford this sinfully stupid practice, so vigilantly guard against its continuance, or we’re doomed.


Reaganites learned it is POLICY change that changes economic trajectory. Reagan’s successes were built on establishing a fiscal framework that invigorated our entire economy, revitalized growth and investment while decreasing spending, tax rates, over-reaching regulations, unemployment, and favoritism via individual subsidies. We need Reaganites in the new Administration.


However well meaning, burdensome federal government imposition is never the solution. Never. Not in our homes, not in our schools, not in churches, not in businesses.


Gotta’ have faith the Trump team knows all this. And I’ll be the first to acknowledge concerns over a deal cut by leveraging taxpayer interests to make a manufacturer stay put are unfounded – once terms are made public.


But know that fundamentally, political intrusion using a stick or carrot to bribe or force one individual business to do what politicians insist, versus establishing policy incentivizing our ENTIRE ethical economic engine to roar back to life, isn’t the answer. Cajole only chosen ones on Main St or Wall St and watch lines stretch from Washington to Alaska full of businesses threatening to bail unless taxpayers pony up. The lines strangle competition and really, really, dispiritingly screw with workers’ lives. It’s beyond unacceptable, so let’s anticipate equal incentivizes and positive reform all across the field – to make the economy great again.


-Sarah Palin
 
ok

a) Does Trump want Governor Palin to head the VA?

b) Is Palin sucking up to Trump in hope of getting the nomination?

c) Does Palin know that while some jobs may have been saved (reports range from 800 - 1,000), separate reports indicate that same Carrier unit will be sending more jobs than that to Mexico?
" why are you so irate that Trump saved 1100 jobs? " a bloke elsewhere in cyberspace
This is not an insensible question.
Unfortunately, it has an ominous answer.

It may seem a very modest precedent.

BUT !!

It's reported that:
a) Carrier is still sending more jobs South than it's keeping here. They report the ones staying, but don't talk much about the reportedly greater number of jobs going to Mexico.

b) Government (Indiana & or Uncle Sam) has given up a reported $7 $million in tax revenue to keep the jobs here.

And that's a huge part of the problem.

Now every employer in the U.S. that employs over 100 workers can threaten to move to Mexico. They negotiate $million $dollar tax benefits, shifting the tax burden to the wage earners who then have to make up the $difference.
And the employers stays put, as it had planned to do all along.
And after all that Trump claims credit for SAVING MORE JOBS!!

Over a 4 year Trump administration this could end up costing middle class tax payer $tens of $billions of $dollars that otherwise would have been paid by business.

I haven't heard any sensible economists praise this deal.
 
ok

a) Does Trump want Governor Palin to head the VA?

b) Is Palin sucking up to Trump in hope of getting the nomination?

c) Does Palin know that while some jobs may have been saved (reports range from 800 - 1,000), separate reports indicate that same Carrier unit will be sending more jobs than that to Mexico?

This is not an insensible question.
Unfortunately, it has an ominous answer.

It may seem a very modest precedent.

BUT !!

It's reported that:
a) Carrier is still sending more jobs South than it's keeping here. They report the ones staying, but don't talk much about the reportedly greater number of jobs going to Mexico.

b) Government (Indiana & or Uncle Sam) has given up a reported $7 $million in tax revenue to keep the jobs here.

And that's a huge part of the problem.

Now every employer in the U.S. that employs over 100 workers can threaten to move to Mexico. They negotiate $million $dollar tax benefits, shifting the tax burden to the wage earners who then have to make up the $difference.
And the employers stays put, as it had planned to do all along.
And after all that Trump claims credit for SAVING MORE JOBS!!

Over a 4 year Trump administration this could end up costing middle class tax payer $tens of $billions of $dollars that otherwise would have been paid by business.

I haven't heard any sensible economists praise this deal.


a) Did you read the article?
b) Did you read the part I emphasized?
c) wtf ru talking about?
 
Sarah Palin?? :awesome:

She's completely clueless, it wasn't a "federal action". She fails to understand states do this all the time-
but saving US jobs from outsourcing is somehow ...

... burdensome federal government imposition is never the solution. Never. Not in our homes, not in our schools, not in churches, not in businesses.

the woman is daft.

a business must have freedom to locate where it wishes. In a free market, if a business makes a mistake (including a marketing mistake that perhaps Carrier executives made), threatening to move elsewhere claiming efficiency’s sake, then the market’s invisible hand punishes.
blah blah blah . carrier was already profitable - no "mistakes"
 
"c) wtf ru talking about?"
"I am ecstatic for Carrier employees! Their bosses just decided to keep shop onshore. What a relief for hundreds of workers. Merry Christmas Indiana!" Palin
 
"women can do more than have babies!" #8
You've reminded me of a joke.

Wife to husband:
My gynecologist says I can't have sex for two weeks.

Husband to wife:
What did your dentist say?
 
I think we merely and simply, need to excise the difference between our First World minimum wage and the Third World; we can even call it, Equalization.
 
Back
Top