Sanders criticizes Israeli ethnic cleansing.

moon

Satire for Sanity
Are Sanders’ Criticisms of Israeli Occupation Policies unprecedented in a Presidential Campaign?
By Juan Cole | Apr. 7, 2016 |

Bernie Sanders is being attacked for comments on the Middle East in his interview with the editorial board of The New York Daily News, but all he did was restate current US government policy.
What is remarkable is that Sanders dared just, like, criticize Israeli policy toward the Palestinians as involving illegal squatter settlements and disproportionate use of force. Everyone knows these things, but I can’t recall another presidential candidate who said them outright during a campaign. This is because although they are a small minority, Jewish Americans form a swing vote in some key states like Florida, and they are unusually generous in donating to political campaigns. And politicians assume that Jewish Americans are looking for unvarnished praise of Israel. But while arch-conservative pro-Israel lobbies like AIPAC may never want to hear a discouraging word, Jewish Americans (most of them political liberals and leftists) are deeply divided on the far-right Likud government of PM Binyamin Netanyahu, and Sen. Sanders is well aware of this. Besides, his crowd-sourced funding model means he does not need the donations of billionaire American Likudniks.

http://www.juancole.com/2016/04/are...s-unprecedented-in-presidential-campaign.html

God, how I'd love to see a US president with balls.

Er...no, Hillary. That's BALLS- not bombs. Learn the difference.
 
she has great big Margret thatcher sized balls just like me

In the 1982 Malvinas conflict Margaret Thatcher ordered a nuclear submarine to station off the coast of Buenos Aires. That's not ' balls '. That's insanity. Billary does not know the difference either.
 
In the 1982 Malvinas conflict Margaret Thatcher ordered a nuclear submarine to station off the coast of Buenos Aires. That's not ' balls '. That's insanity. Billary does not know the difference either.

You are truly an ill informed twat, HMS Conqueror was a Churchill nuclear powered submarine not a nuclear armed one. I don't expect you to appreciate the difference.

Conqueror, commanded by Commander Chris Wreford-Brown, was most famously deployed during the Falklands War, setting sail from Faslane Naval Base on the Gare Loch in Scotland on 3 April 1982, one day after the Argentine invasion. Conqueror arrived in the exclusion zone around the Falkland Islands twenty-one days later and was ordered to scan the area for Argentine shipping, particularly the aircraft carrier Veinticinco de Mayo. On 30 April, she spotted the Argentine light cruiser General Belgrano sailing southwest of the Falklands, just outside the exclusion zone imposed by the British on all shipping. With Veinticinco de Mayo approaching the islands from the north, the commander of the British Taskforce, Admiral 'Sandy' Woodward, feared a pincer attack, with Belgrano attacking from the south and Veinticinco de Mayo from the north and requested permission from the British government to sink the Belgrano.
-
After some debate, permission to engage Belgrano was sent to the submarine from the Royal Navy's fleet command centre in Northwood in the United Kingdom. In the intervening time Belgrano had retired from its attack position and turned west since the Veinticinco de Mayo was not yet ready to engage the British fleet. This later caused some controversy, although Belgrano's captain and the Argentine government later acknowledged that the attack was a legitimate act of war.
-
On 2 May Conqueror became the first nuclear-powered submarine to fire in anger launching three Mark 8 torpedoes at Belgrano, two of which struck the ship and exploded. Twenty minutes later, the ship was sinking rapidly and was abandoned by her crew. General Belgrano was unable to issue a Mayday signal because of electrical failure; this and poor visibility meant the two escorting destroyers were unaware of the sinking until some hours later. A total of 323 men were killed. Adding to the confusion, the crew of the ARA Bouchard felt an impact that was possibly the third torpedo striking at the end of its run (an examination of the ship later showed an impact mark consistent with a torpedo). The two ships continued on their course westward and began dropping depth charges. By the time the ships realised that something had happened to the Belgrano, it was already dark and the weather had worsened, scattering the life rafts.
-
Conqueror's war did not end there. The crew of the submarine had to face Argentine Air Force attempts to locate her in the days after the attack, which had shocked the Argentine people and ruling dictatorship. Conqueror did not fire again in anger throughout the war, but provided valuable help to the task force by using sophisticated monitoring equipment to track Argentine aircraft departing the mainland.
-
After the war, Conqueror returned to Faslane, flying a Jolly Roger adorned with torpedoes, a customary act of Royal Navy submarines after a kill. When asked about the incident later, Commander Wreford-Brown responded, "The Royal Navy spent thirteen years preparing me for such an occasion. It would have been regarded as extremely dreary if I had fouled it up".

...

Class and type: Churchill-class submarine
-
Displacement: 4,900 tonnes (submerged)
-
Length: 86.9 m (285 ft)
-
Beam: 10.1 m (33 ft)
-
Draught: 8.2 m (27 ft)
-
Propulsion: One Rolls-Royce PWR nuclear reactor, one shaft
-
Speed: 28 knots (52 km/h) (submerged)
-
Range: Limited only by food stored on board
-
Complement: 103
-
Armament:

6 x 533 mm tubes capable of firing:
  • Mark 8 torpedoes
  • Tigerfish torpedoes
  • Sub Harpoon Missiles

http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/630-hms-conqueror-s48/
 
You are truly an ill informed twat, HMS Conqueror was a Churchill nuclear powered submarine not a nuclear armed one. I don't expect you to appreciate the difference.



http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/630-hms-conqueror-s48/

You're a deliberately deceptive little charmer, aincha;


Propaganda sponge. And a Thatcherite too, no doubt.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top