Russians striking NATO weapons supply routes.

The US State Department says it supported the approval of a possible sale of $165m worth of ammunition to Ukraine.
Antony Blinken and Lloyd Austin promise Ukraine $322m in US military aid, after meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Kyiv.
They also say US diplomats will start returning to the western city of Lviv in the coming week.
Russian top diplomat to Washington warns that the delivery of more military aid would be like “pouring oil on the flames”.
Several locations in central and western Ukraine have been hit by Russian shelling, including five railway stations and two towns in Vinnytsia region, local authorities have said.
 
The US State Department says it supported the approval of a possible sale of $165m worth of ammunition to Ukraine.
Antony Blinken and Lloyd Austin promise Ukraine $322m in US military aid, after meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Kyiv.
They also say US diplomats will start returning to the western city of Lviv in the coming week.
Russian top diplomat to Washington warns that the delivery of more military aid would be like “pouring oil on the flames”.
Several locations in central and western Ukraine have been hit by Russian shelling, including five railway stations and two towns in Vinnytsia region, local authorities have said.

Purposefully targeting and destroying civilian infrastructure is a war crime.

Thanks for reminding the forum members why it is so important to see the notorious fascist war criminal Vlad Putin defeated.
 
Purposefully targeting and destroying civilian infrastructure is a war crime.

Thanks for reminding the forum members why it is so important to see the notorious fascist war criminal Vlad Putin defeated.
so NATO gets to send advanced weapons by rail (civilian infrastructure) in it's proxy war against Russia but Russia cant go after it?
That's completely illogical
 
Purposefully targeting and destroying civilian infrastructure is a war crime.

Railways,aircraft,shipping procured by the military are no longer ' civilian '

Next you'll be calling the disablement of rail services ' genocide ' You are a pious poseur.
 
Last edited:
so NATO gets to send advanced weapons by rail (civilian infrastructure) in it's proxy war against Russia but Russia cant go after it?
That's completely illogical
Do I have to show you the pictures of Marupiel and Kharkiv again to remind you that your hero Vlad Putin is systematically destroying Ukrainian civil and civilian infrastructure --> housing, hospitals, schools, railways, pretty much any standing structure, in an obvious criminal attempt to erase Ukranian nationhood.
 
That wasn't hard to predict . There's been no end of yapping about feeding Ukraine with weapons but scant little on how that is to be achieved.

And humanitarian routes working to get innocent Ukrainians out and needed medical supplies in for those innocent Ukrainians targeted by Russians
 
Railways,aircraft,shipping procured by the military are no longer ' civilian '

Next you'll be calling the disablement of rail services ' genocide ' You are a pious poseur.
Ukraine did not attack Russia. There is no justification - none, nada, zilch - for Russia to be destroying rail stations, civilian infrastructure, or reducing once vibrant Ukranian cities to piles of smoking ash.
 
And humanitarian routes working to get innocent Ukrainians out and needed medical supplies in for those innocent Ukrainians targeted by Russians

They are in the Ukrainian line of fire too- and the Russians have been offering escape windows for them. Why do the Ukrainians keep refusing to let them out ?
 
Do I have to show you the pictures of Marupiel and Kharkiv again to remind you that your hero Vlad Putin is systematically destroying Ukrainian civil and civilian infrastructure --> housing, hospitals, schools, railways, pretty much any standing structure, in an obvious criminal attempt to erase Ukranian nationhood.

Are you starting to think that the US-led coup of 2014 wasn't such a smart idea ?

No, of course you're not. You believe in NATO expansion and you hope for the collapse of the Russian Federation. You are your own enemy.
 
Ukraine did not attack Russia. There is no justification - none, nada, zilch - for Russia to be destroying rail stations, civilian infrastructure, or reducing once vibrant Ukranian cities to piles of smoking ash.

NATO should never have insisted on moving eastwards, the US should never have assisted NATO by way of the coup of 2014 and the Ukrainian Neo-Nazis should never have been allowed to attack the breakaway regions for 8 years. Blaming Russia for this chaos is shallow and transparent- but welcomed by self-styled defenders of ' Russian democracy ' such as your hypocritical self.

As in all such urban conflicts the military use civilian infrastructure for cover. When you talk about such infrastructure being destroyed don't forget to mention that. Your mantra that Russians destroy for no reason is absolute horseshit. After all- it will be Russian territory if they win .
 
Do I have to show you the pictures of Marupiel and Kharkiv again to remind you that your hero Vlad Putin is systematically destroying Ukrainian civil and civilian infrastructure --> housing, hospitals, schools, railways, pretty much any standing structure, in an obvious criminal attempt to erase Ukranian nationhood.
There are Uk regular forces in those cities.
Even the bombed out steelworks with trapped civilians also have (or just had) Uk forces.

You want a nice clean orderly war by Hoyle's rules - but you are fine with NATO pumping in arms to non-NATO country by civilian rails. Then complain when Russia goes after NATO weapons
Maybe you should put some effort into calling for peace talks to try to restrict this abomination from swallowing all Uk with more and more
However the war ends Ukraine is pulverized. stop it now.
 
Russian and Donbass troops mainly control the city, but a number of Ukrainian soldiers have been holed up in Azovstal. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, however, claimed last week that roughly 1,000 civilians remained in the mill as well.
 
Do I have to show you the pictures of Marupiel and Kharkiv again to remind you that your hero Vlad Putin is systematically destroying Ukrainian civil and civilian infrastructure

Mariupol and Kharkhiv are both Russian-speaking cities. Putin's justification for this "special operation" was to protect Russian speakers from "genocide" and of course "denazify" the country.

Now we see Putin's plan - when the cities have been flattened, the people who are left will be safe from genocide and nazis! Smart, huh? I just hope the people are grateful. Do you think they will be?
 
NATO should never have insisted on moving eastwards

NATO did not insist on expanding eastwards. Latvia and Estonia – the only members bordering Russia – wanted to join NATO ever since they became independent, and were finally admitted in 2004.

If they hadn’t joined, where do you think they would be now? Hint: there is a 25% Russian-speaking minority in Latvia.

Russian-speakers in Latvia protest Russian invasion of Ukraine
“Ukraine is fighting for Europe, the Baltics, Poland and Finland. If Ukraine falls, we will be the next ...”
https://www.royalsblue.com/russian-speakers-in-latvia-protest-russian-invasion-of-ukraine/
 
There are Uk regular forces in those cities.
Even the bombed out steelworks with trapped civilians also have (or just had) Uk forces.

You want a nice clean orderly war by Hoyle's rules - but you are fine with NATO pumping in arms to non-NATO country by civilian rails. Then complain when Russia goes after NATO weapons
Maybe you should put some effort into calling for peace talks to try to restrict this abomination from swallowing all Uk with more and more
However the war ends Ukraine is pulverized. stop it now.
USA did not reduce Basra, Najaf, or Baghdad to a smouldering pike of ash.

Ukraine did not attack, andd not threaten to attack Russia.

There is no justification, none, nada, zilch, for Russia to destroy one Ukranian bridge or railway, let alone reduce once vibrant Ukranian cities to piles of dust.
 
Are you starting to think that the US-led coup of 2014 wasn't such a smart idea ?

No, of course you're not. You believe in NATO expansion and you hope for the collapse of the Russian Federation. You are your own enemy.

You don't give a shit about the welfare of the Russian people.

I do, and I have the posts to prove it.


What I will no abide is unprovoked naked aggression and war crimes being committed in Russia's name.
 
NATO did not insist on expanding eastwards.

Sure it did. The Russians got the promise that it would not- NATO reneged. Expansion is NATO policy- along with the collapse of the Russian Federation.

We're witnessing NATO's proxy war on Russia right now. We'll see who wins, won't we- unless NATO forces a nuclear confrontation- and then we won't.
 
You don't give a shit about the welfare of the Russian people.

I do, and I have the posts to prove it.


What I will no abide is unprovoked naked aggression and war crimes being committed in Russia's name.

Nah- you're just a mouth in the Navalny vein, an attention-seeking Russo-phobe .
To use your OWN vernacular- you'd have been masturbating over the successful US-led coup in Ukraine and treating Poroshenko to a blow-job if you'd had the opportunity. Now you want to drop your strides for Zelensky , you shameless hussy.


Haw, haw....................................haw.
 
USA did not reduce Basra, Najaf, or Baghdad to a smouldering pike of ash.

Ukraine did not attack, andd not threaten to attack Russia.

There is no justification, none, nada, zilch, for Russia to destroy one Ukranian bridge or railway, let alone reduce once vibrant Ukranian cities to piles of dust.

By now you must be thinking that the US-led Ukrainian coup of 2014 wasn't such a hot idea.
 
Back
Top