No..he was stalking Martin...if anyone had a claim to stand your ground it was Martin.
Who knows...he was exhibiting arrogance and a sense of self importance. He killed a kid and claimed 'self defense'...he appears to feel 'entitled' due to a horrible law. In my view he was acting like a bully from what I've learned. He was told to stand down and ignored it, a kid died. Why aren't the teabaggers yelling at him to take responsibility for his failure? Rhetorical question.
No..he was stalking Martin...if anyone had a claim to stand your ground it was Martin.
Didn't Zimmerman need to kill Martin because the boy attacked him?
zimmerman hasn't been charged with stalking.
it's not illegal to follow someone.
There is no evidence that trayvon had standing to invoke stand your ground.
no need to call people harsh names for taking a different stance bro. also he/she is offering their opinion, I don't really see where the lie is at.
zimmerman hasn't been charged with stalking.
it's not illegal to follow someone.
There is no evidence that trayvon had standing to invoke stand your ground.
note to fellow zimmerman brothers in arms!:
This is how you must respond to the hang zimmerman crowd. They argue very emotionally, often without evidence, because in their hearts they are anti-gun and this has become just as much of a political issue as anything else. A frenzy of epic proportions that have had people denying zimmerman was injured because of a few seconds of tape (which we now know, he had multiple head wounds). The same people that led to the media purposely editing the audio tapes into zimmerman saying something else. There has been pure propaganda and the proles have fallen for it hook line and sinker. What else have we been lied to about with regards to this situation?
Stick to the facts and curt responses, and don't let them get away with the emotional web of confusion. Don't get wrapped up in the long drawn out pointless arguments where you'll never be listened to. just repeat the necessary mantras.
Fuck the liars.
Why should lies be responded to with anything but scorn?
When the truth comes out and it's shown that their angel "Martin" was just another thg wannabe, do you think a single one of them is going to admit that they were "in error"?
Fuck no.
All they're going to do is find a way to blame it on the courts and use it to continue to spread their fucking lies.
it's not productive usfreedom. you have to fight fire with fire. the time is now, we must use reverse propaganda. Mantras. Call out their lack of evidence. Remind them of how the burden of proof is on them. And then once you've neutralized the opposition, you go on the offensive.
Is that what Zimmerman was doing? 'Walking around in public'?Would a braver man be able to walk around in public without a gun, then?
Is that what Zimmerman was doing? 'Walking around in public'?