You are a constitutional illiterate.Could trump himself be deported? Without birth right citizenship, trump's citizenship is based on his father's citizenship. Without his father's birth right citizenship, his father's citizenship is based on his parents who lied on their immigration papers. Lying on their immigration papers make them illegal immigrants, much like melania was an illegal immigrant for taking jobs illegally on a tourist visa.
But of course, trump only wants future birth right citizenships to be thrown away.
trump wants to reinterpret the Constitution to say there was never a right to birthright citizenship... But only going forward. Never means that it was also not there in the past.You are a constitutional illiterate.
Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "no Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."
That means even if Trump passes such a law, it only applies from the day it is passed onward. Those already here and given birthright citizenship will still have it.
There is nothing in the constitution about birthright citizenship. That's just a misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment. Clarifying that with a law that says if you're here illegally, or not a citizen, then your child when born here isn't a citizen either. That takes away the unclarity, that's all.trump wants to reinterpret the Constitution to say there was never a right to birthright citizenship... But only going forward. Never means that it was also not there in the past.
By the way, you cannot pass a law replacing the Constitution.
Great, we can deport trump.There is nothing in the constitution about birthright citizenship. That's just a misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment. Clarifying that with a law that says if you're here illegally, or not a citizen, then your child when born here isn't a citizen either. That takes away the unclarity, that's all.
No, you moron, there's that ex-post facto thing.Great, we can deport trump.
No, it is a reinterpretation, which is different.No, you moron, there's that ex-post facto thing.
Doesn't change one whit what I said. No ex-post facto laws.No, it is a reinterpretation, which is different.
trump wants to reinterpret the Constitution, which is not an ex post facto law.Doesn't change one whit what I said. No ex-post facto laws.
The Supreme Court will rule on the 14th Amendment and hopefully will be ruled to not apply to anchor babies.trump wants to reinterpret the Constitution, which is not an ex post facto law.
And then we can deport trump, whose only claim to citizenship is based on the supposedly misinterpreted 14th Amendment?The Supreme Court will rule on the 14th Amendment and hopefully will be ruled to not apply to anchor babies.
It's 6-3...poor Walter.
Its "RICH" indeed for "TheRichFromCali" to be mocking President Trump's immigration policies.