Republicans showing their true colors and true intent

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
That is actually my point, you Post Modern Fool as YOU seem to confuse the two in the discussion, as the chronology of the posts shows. Being a Post Modern Fool, you seem to think that YOU can introduce anything you want into a discussion and then pretend YOU didn't....more so to the point YOU try to place your Post Modern Failure onto someone else. But as always, despite what comes off your PMP keyboard, the chronology of the posts will always be your undoing. (this is where PMP copies on line from my post and tries to pretend that's all I said, or adds on his own lies/insults...or he just repeats his already disproven PMP lies.)

When you refuse to answer a question,
Just say "I don't have a clue", and be done with it....saves a lot of key strokes...

That's our intellectually impotent Bravo, folks....shooting blanks and projecting his own sorry state as he rushes to the defense of an equally mentally challenged neocon flunkie.

 

[Taichiliberal]

On Post #156 this exchange was answered

1. Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
I've read through this thread, and to date the supporters for this neo-fascist proposal have yet to provide the parts of the Constitution that support this insanity in Michigan.
Post Modern Prophet: oh, that would be "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.".....I'm sorry we hadn't covered that for you....


To which I pointed out via Sen. Conyers Article One, Section Ten of the Constitution, which essentially shows WHY the Snyder’s bill that gives his appointees the ability to negate rights and protections delegated by the Constitution.

But rather than just acknowledge this little fact, our Post Modern Fool plays once again displays his dishonest nature by trying to play dumber than he is regarding his reading comprehension (which I don’t think is actually possible).

But I forget that our Post Modern Fool is all headline and no text. Pages 2, 25, 28, and 37 of the Michigan HB-4214 (passed on 3/16/11) demonstrated the powers bestowed by Governor Synder's appointees during a declared financial crisis.....to which Sen. Conyers rightly pointed out it's unconstitutionality. Now let's watch our chuckling PMP clown "shazzam" his way out of his self made foolishness.

the reason Conyers gave in the quote you provided in post #156 was that the government had no authority to change contracts Actually, Conyers pointed out that Gov. Snyder's Michigan bill, which enacts appointees to supercede city elected gov't during a declared fiscal emergency (by the Gov. and his GOP friendly local Congress) would violate the Constitution (Article 1, Section 10) by giving them the power to negate contracts......when I responded to that claim you complained I was trying to change the subject You lie, as the chronology of the posts shows ......when I pointed out you were the one who introduced that subject, you denied it Actually, I PROVED that you are a liar in the previous response....You just act the Post Modern Fool and ignore what you don't like....you've done nothing besides squirm uncomfortably ever since......as ever, I enjoy watching you squirm uncomfortably.....

And as the chronology of the posts shows, folks, that whenever the Post Modern Fool cannot BS his way past me, he just lies about previous exchanges, ignores what his PMFool ass doesn't like, and just keeps repeating his PMF assertions and lies in various ways ad nauseum. I leave the PMF to repeat his folly to his and his compadres content, as the chronology of the posts in their entirety will always be their undoing.

 

[DamnYankee]

Can you be any more disingenuous and dishonest?

The original House version:

* Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7%–93%)
* Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0%–100%)

* Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%–6%)
* Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%–15%)

The Senate version:

* Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5%–95%)
* Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0%–100%)
* Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%–2%)
* Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%–16%)

11 voted against it, verses 107 Southern Democrats. That's a ratio of almost 10:1 Democrat/ Republican who voted against civil rights.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

And as the chronology of the posts shows, folks, that whenever the Post Modern Fool cannot BS his way past me, he just lies about previous exchanges, ignores what his PMFool ass doesn't like, and just keeps repeating his PMF assertions and lies in various ways ad nauseum. I leave the PMF to repeat his folly to his and his compadres content, as the chronology of the posts in their entirety will always be their undoing.

"the chronology of the posts shows" you don't know what the CONTENT of the posts shows.....