Rep. William Jefferson's bribes hidden as consulting fees

RockX

Banned
Witness: US Rep's bribes hidden as consulting fees

By MATTHEW BARAKAT – 2 hours ago

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — A Kentucky businessman testified Wednesday he paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in "consulting fees" to the wife of a former Louisiana congressman that were nothing but thinly veiled bribes.

Vernon Jackson, who ran a Louisville telecommunications firm called iGate Inc., was the first witness to testify in the bribery trial of William Jefferson, a Democrat who represented parts of New Orleans until losing his re-election bid last year.

Jackson is also one of the trial's most important witnesses. Out of numerous bribery schemes that prosecutors allege Jefferson orchestrated, the one involving Jackson was the most advanced and involved the largest payments.

Jefferson has pleaded not guilty to soliciting bribes, racketeering, money laundering and other crimes. In opening statements, defense lawyer Robert Trout told the jury that some of Jefferson's deals might be considered unethical, but are not illegal under federal bribery laws.

Jackson pleaded guilty in 2006 to paying more than $400,000 in bribes to Jefferson and was sentenced to more than seven years in prison. He stands to receive a reduction in his sentence in exchange for his testimony against Jefferson.

Testifying in a green prison jumpsuit, Jackson told jurors that his relationship with Jefferson began legitimately. Jackson felt he needed some public officials on his side as he sought Army contracts for a technology he invented that purported to move data over copper transmission lines at speeds that rival more advanced fiber optic lines.

Jackson, who is black, felt that Jefferson — a member of the Congressional Black Caucus with a reputation for promoting African-American business ventures — could help him.

Indeed, Jackson testified that Jefferson set up a meeting with Army officials attended by two other members of Congress, in which the Army agreed to test Jackson's technology with an eye toward purchasing it.

After that meeting, though, Jefferson told Jackson that he could not continue to devote as much time to iGate unless Jackson agreed to hire a business consultant. And Jefferson had a specific consultant in mind: his wife Andrea.

"It sent up a red flag for me," Jackson testified, but he was assured by Jefferson that the arrangement was legitimate.

Jackson agreed to pay $90,000 a year in consulting fees to Andrea Jefferson's company, the ANJ Group. He later agreed to give ANJ group a stake in iGate and a percentage of certain profits.

Andrea Jefferson, though, never did anything for iGate, Jackson said. All the work was done by William Jefferson.

"I was paying him to use his office on behalf of iGate," Jackson said.

Jefferson helped iGate secure a contract from a Nigerian company called Netlink Digital Television (NDTV), which paid iGate $6.5 million.

But the deal soon soured, and NDTV wanted its money back. In 2004, NDTV threatened to expose what it saw as Jefferson's corrupt involvement in the deal.

"The information we have would make interesting reading in Washington," NDTV's lawyers wrote in one letter shown to the jury.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gAhJ_ijKsVNeqkiH39KhnCUNj-fQD98SMS280


LOL

This happened in 2005 and only took 4 years to get him to court. If he had been a Republican, he would already be in prison.
 
Witness: US Rep's bribes hidden as consulting fees

By MATTHEW BARAKAT – 2 hours ago

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — A Kentucky businessman testified Wednesday he paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in "consulting fees" to the wife of a former Louisiana congressman that were nothing but thinly veiled bribes.

Vernon Jackson, who ran a Louisville telecommunications firm called iGate Inc., was the first witness to testify in the bribery trial of William Jefferson, a Democrat who represented parts of New Orleans until losing his re-election bid last year.

Jackson is also one of the trial's most important witnesses. Out of numerous bribery schemes that prosecutors allege Jefferson orchestrated, the one involving Jackson was the most advanced and involved the largest payments.

Jefferson has pleaded not guilty to soliciting bribes, racketeering, money laundering and other crimes. In opening statements, defense lawyer Robert Trout told the jury that some of Jefferson's deals might be considered unethical, but are not illegal under federal bribery laws.

Jackson pleaded guilty in 2006 to paying more than $400,000 in bribes to Jefferson and was sentenced to more than seven years in prison. He stands to receive a reduction in his sentence in exchange for his testimony against Jefferson.

Testifying in a green prison jumpsuit, Jackson told jurors that his relationship with Jefferson began legitimately. Jackson felt he needed some public officials on his side as he sought Army contracts for a technology he invented that purported to move data over copper transmission lines at speeds that rival more advanced fiber optic lines.

Jackson, who is black, felt that Jefferson — a member of the Congressional Black Caucus with a reputation for promoting African-American business ventures — could help him.

Indeed, Jackson testified that Jefferson set up a meeting with Army officials attended by two other members of Congress, in which the Army agreed to test Jackson's technology with an eye toward purchasing it.

After that meeting, though, Jefferson told Jackson that he could not continue to devote as much time to iGate unless Jackson agreed to hire a business consultant. And Jefferson had a specific consultant in mind: his wife Andrea.

"It sent up a red flag for me," Jackson testified, but he was assured by Jefferson that the arrangement was legitimate.

Jackson agreed to pay $90,000 a year in consulting fees to Andrea Jefferson's company, the ANJ Group. He later agreed to give ANJ group a stake in iGate and a percentage of certain profits.

Andrea Jefferson, though, never did anything for iGate, Jackson said. All the work was done by William Jefferson.

"I was paying him to use his office on behalf of iGate," Jackson said.

Jefferson helped iGate secure a contract from a Nigerian company called Netlink Digital Television (NDTV), which paid iGate $6.5 million.

But the deal soon soured, and NDTV wanted its money back. In 2004, NDTV threatened to expose what it saw as Jefferson's corrupt involvement in the deal.

"The information we have would make interesting reading in Washington," NDTV's lawyers wrote in one letter shown to the jury.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gAhJ_ijKsVNeqkiH39KhnCUNj-fQD98SMS280


LOL

This happened in 2005 and only took 4 years to get him to court. If he had been a Republican, he would already be in prison.


Republicans did not lose power till fall 2006?

Jefferson should resign if guilty as with all corrupt politicos.
 
The culture of corruption is not limited to one party.
If you did not realize that you are not just a partisan hack but a dumb one.
Our govt has been basically sold to big money from various sources.
 
Robert Trout, Congressman William Jefferson's defense lawyer opening remarks.

"I almost think I should begin with a joke about cold cash or frozen assets," defense lawyer Robert Trout told the jury at the start of his opening statement yesterday.

The money in the freezer? "He was leaving town for the month of August. He was looking to hide the cash . . . so it would not be found by the housekeeper or an intruder," Trout explained.

Payments made to Jefferson by a businessman who pleaded guilty to bribing the congressman? "Kind of a finder's fee," Trout reasoned.

The $100,000 bribe Jefferson had agreed to give the vice president of Nigeria? "An upfront payment."

Jefferson being caught on tape soliciting bribes? His client, Trout said, had consumed "a lot of wine."

You know you're in trouble when your lawyer describes you as sleazy but not technically a criminal. "He used who he was to help businesses in which his family members had an interest," Trout said. "These facts alone are not themselves crimes."

"A lot of what you hear you will disapprove of and find distasteful coming from a member of Congress," Trout readily confessed. "Did he say and do foolish things? . . . Yes, he did." But, the lawyer argued, "he is not charged with a violation of House ethics rules. He is accused of a crime."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/16/AR2009061603472_pf.html

LOL

Why do I see an appeal from Jefferson based on the fact his lawyer is incompetent.
 
Back
Top