RAPE IN MARRIAGE IS NO CRIME

R

RockX

Banned
Sheikh Maulana Abu Sayeed, who runs the largest network of sharia courts in Britain, claimed husbands who rape their wives should not be prosecuted because “sex is part of marriage”.

When asked if he believed non-consensual marital sex could be rape he said *defiantly: “No.

“Clearly there cannot be any rape within the marriage. Maybe aggression, maybe indecent activity.”

He said the “aggression” of reporting the man to police was greater than the “minor aggression” of forcing a woman to have sexual intercourse against her will.

He claimed many married women who alleged rape were lying.

“In most of the cases, they have been advised by solicitors that one of the four *reasons for which a wife can get a divorce is rape.

“Why it is happening in this society is because they have got this idea of so-called equality, equal rights.”

Sheikh Sayeed said the concept of rape within *marriage was “not Islamic”.

He said: “It is not an assault, it is not some kind of jumping on somebody’s individual right.

“When they got married, the understanding was that sexual intercourse was part of the marriage, so there *cannot be anything against sex in marriage.

“Of course, if it happened without her desire, that is no good, that is not desirable.”

He said husbands can be dealt with under sharia law, but there is no need for the police to be called in.

Asked how husbands accused of rape should be dealt with, he said: “He may be disciplined, and he may be made to ask forgiveness. That should be enough.”


http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/205474/Rape-in-marriage-is-no-crime-says-cleric#


LOL

I love these little gems from the so called "Religion Of Peace".

At least get her a cake.

View attachment 527
 
Yurt said:
our common law was the same way, it could only be rape if it was a non spouse
Click to expand...

Somewhat shockingly, the House of Lords decision holding that a man could actually commit the offence of rape against his wife was only forthcoming in 1991.
 
If you love those gems from the religion of peace, you ought to really love these gems from your own "Land of the free and Home of the Brave".

""Many United States rape statutes formerly precluded the prosecution of spouses, including estranged or even legally separated couples. In 1975, South Dakota removed this exception.[14] In 1993, North Carolina became the last state to remove the spousal exemption.[3] However, as of 1999, 33 of 50 U.S. states regard spousal rape as a lesser crime [Bergen, 1999]. The perpetrator may be charged with related crimes such as assault, battery, or spousal abuse. There are other criminal charges that may be inapplicable to married couples. For example, in the U.S., there is a marriage exemption to the charge of statutory rape even if one of the spouses is under the age of consent in the jurisdiction where the sexual act takes place."

From wikipedia.


"Until 1993, North Carolina's rape law stated that “a person may not be prosecuted under this article if the victim is the person's legal spouse at the time of the commission of the alleged rape or sexual offense, unless the parties are living separate and apart.”"

From: http://www.times-standard.com/ci_8668539






So it was legal to rape your wife in this country until fairly recently. And even more recently it wasn't a crime to use threats to get sex from your spouse or to have sex with her when she was unable to give consent.
 
Last edited:
webbway said:
:lol:

I knew I would get some "religion of peace" defenders from this post.
Click to expand...

You knew what? :eek3: Please show us where anyone defended the "religion of peace". I see where several people pointed out that your rant could be aimed at numerous nations, including ours, up until a few years ago.
 
Of course what's hysterical about this is that spousal rape was perfectly legal in the United states very recently. It wasn't until the 1970's that states began criminalizing spousal rape, and it was still legal in some states up until the early 90's.

And what social movement is responsible for educating the public about spousal rape? What social movement lead the fight to criminalize spousal rape?

Why, second wave feminism of course.

Fought by cons every step of the way.

And like everything else, as soon as society accepted the hard-fought gains of a liberal movement, the cons appropriated it and pretended like they were for it all along.

Just like Glenn Beck "taking back the civil rights movement."

You people are jokes and only ignorant sad sacks with zero knowledge of even recent history are bamboozled by you.
 
WinterBorn said:
If you love those gems from the religion of peace, you ought to really love these gems from your own "Land of the free and Home of the Brave".

""Many United States rape statutes formerly precluded the prosecution of spouses, including estranged or even legally separated couples. In 1975, South Dakota removed this exception.[14] In 1993, North Carolina became the last state to remove the spousal exemption.[3] However, as of 1999, 33 of 50 U.S. states regard spousal rape as a lesser crime [Bergen, 1999]. The perpetrator may be charged with related crimes such as assault, battery, or spousal abuse. There are other criminal charges that may be inapplicable to married couples. For example, in the U.S., there is a marriage exemption to the charge of statutory rape even if one of the spouses is under the age of consent in the jurisdiction where the sexual act takes place."

From wikipedia.


"Until 1993, North Carolina's rape law stated that “a person may not be prosecuted under this article if the victim is the person's legal spouse at the time of the commission of the alleged rape or sexual offense, unless the parties are living separate and apart.”"

From: http://www.times-standard.com/ci_8668539






So it was legal to rape your wife in this country until fairly recently. And even more recently it wasn't a crime to use threats to get sex from your spouse or to have sex with her when she was unable to give consent.
Click to expand...

Sorry, I didnt take the time to see you had already posted this before I went on my feminist rant.
 
charver said:
Somewhat shockingly, the House of Lords decision holding that a man could actually commit the offence of rape against his wife was only forthcoming in 1991.
Click to expand...

the idea at the time was to keep government out of the marriage as much as possible....unfortunately, society also had a very different view of spousal abuse, not that it was condoned, but it certaintly wasn't frowned upon as it today....

imo...its the asshole wife beaters who are probably 100% guilty of this disgusting crime upon a spouse
 
WinterBorn said:
You knew what? :eek3: Please show us where anyone defended the "religion of peace". I see where several people pointed out that your rant could be aimed at numerous nations, including ours, up until a few years ago.
Click to expand...

yeah...know idea how he got us pointing out our own country had similar laws is a defense of islam
 
Darla said:
Of course what's hysterical about this is that spousal rape was perfectly legal in the United states very recently. It wasn't until the 1970's that states began criminalizing spousal rape, and it was still legal in some states up until the early 90's.

And what social movement is responsible for educating the public about spousal rape? What social movement lead the fight to criminalize spousal rape?

Why, second wave feminism of course.

Fought by cons every step of the way.

And like everything else, as soon as society accepted the hard-fought gains of a liberal movement, the cons appropriated it and pretended like they were for it all along.

Just like Glenn Beck "taking back the civil rights movement."

You people are jokes and only ignorant sad sacks with zero knowledge of even recent history are bamboozled by you.
Click to expand...
What's hysterical about this is somebody gave that information for both the US and Britlandia before this post.

:D
 
webbway said:
Sheikh Maulana Abu Sayeed, who runs the largest network of sharia courts in Britain, claimed husbands who rape their wives should not be prosecuted because “sex is part of marriage”.

When asked if he believed non-consensual marital sex could be rape he said *defiantly: “No.

“Clearly there cannot be any rape within the marriage. Maybe aggression, maybe indecent activity.”

He said the “aggression” of reporting the man to police was greater than the “minor aggression” of forcing a woman to have sexual intercourse against her will.

He claimed many married women who alleged rape were lying.

“In most of the cases, they have been advised by solicitors that one of the four *reasons for which a wife can get a divorce is rape.

“Why it is happening in this society is because they have got this idea of so-called equality, equal rights.”

Sheikh Sayeed said the concept of rape within *marriage was “not Islamic”.

He said: “It is not an assault, it is not some kind of jumping on somebody’s individual right.

“When they got married, the understanding was that sexual intercourse was part of the marriage, so there *cannot be anything against sex in marriage.

“Of course, if it happened without her desire, that is no good, that is not desirable.”

He said husbands can be dealt with under sharia law, but there is no need for the police to be called in.

Asked how husbands accused of rape should be dealt with, he said: “He may be disciplined, and he may be made to ask forgiveness. That should be enough.”


http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/205474/Rape-in-marriage-is-no-crime-says-cleric#


LOL

I love these little gems from the so called "Religion Of Peace".

At least get her a cake.

View attachment 527
Click to expand...

Yurtsie is fully on board with the concept of refusing to call an admitted rapist what he is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top