President Biden did not defame Rittenhouse…..

This is the part of the case that could be precedent setting.

to win defamation he will have to overcome the defenses argument of being a public figure - I struggle on this as well. this case became so huge, he certainly did become a public figure.

Sandmann only became a public figure because of the defamation - so that is a completely different situation
 
Well, that's what he gets for being politically correct.

He's just naturally considerate to everybody, and nobody gets defamed.

That's because he takes his job seriously.

President Biden is the president for EVERYBODY in the USA.

How cool is that?

We were needing that.
 
zymurgy said:
This is the part of the case that could be precedent setting.

to win defamation he will have to overcome the defenses argument of being a public figure - I struggle on this as well. this case became so huge, he certainly did become a public figure.

Sandmann only became a public figure because of the defamation - so that is a completely different situation
Click to expand...

Easily done. Biden has no interest in the case, except to defame Kyle.
 
Jarod said:
Prove me wrong!
Click to expand...

Biden called Rittenhouse, among other factually wrong things, a "White supremacist." That is a fact.
Biden is clearly a public figure with a considerable reach in terms of media coverage. He as a public figure has a duty to be factual in what he says to the maximum extent possible.
Rittenhouse is not a White supremacist, and is not and never has been associated with any White supremacist group. That too is a fact.
Biden has a large staff that can do things like fact check material and inform him of facts before he speaks on a matter.

Defamation
Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.
Click to expand...
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedic...making,libel and, if only oral, it is slander.

A Biden has never retracted that statement, nor has he or his staff apologized and retracted it, it amounts to a public figure making an intentionally false communication. That false communication has been widely repeated by other parts of the media without correction. This is prima facie evidence that Biden in making that statement defamed Rittenhouse.

It's also par for the course that a mental midget who plagiarized his way through his simple liberal arts degree in law, among other plagiarizations, who has shown a frequent inability to speak coherently, and says thing that are just short of insane, would motorboat his mouth in this case defaming Rittenhouse expecting no retribution for his idiotic and hateful comments.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Biden called Rittenhouse, among other factually wrong things, a "White supremacist." That is a fact.
Biden is clearly a public figure with a considerable reach in terms of media coverage. He as a public figure has a duty to be factual in what he says to the maximum extent possible.
Rittenhouse is not a White supremacist, and is not and never has been associated with any White supremacist group. That too is a fact.
Biden has a large staff that can do things like fact check material and inform him of facts before he speaks on a matter.


https://legal-dictionary.thefreedic...making,libel and, if only oral, it is slander.

A Biden has never retracted that statement, nor has he or his staff apologized and retracted it, it amounts to a public figure making an intentionally false communication. That false communication has been widely repeated by other parts of the media without correction. This is prima facie evidence that Biden in making that statement defamed Rittenhouse.

It's also par for the course that a mental midget who plagiarized his way through his simple liberal arts degree in law, among other plagiarizations, who has shown a frequent inability to speak coherently, and says thing that are just short of insane, would motorboat his mouth in this case defaming Rittenhouse expecting no retribution for his idiotic and hateful comments.
Click to expand...



That is the reputation you cultivate when you party with proud boys after killing white people for supporting black Americans rights
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Biden called Rittenhouse, among other factually wrong things, a "White supremacist." That is a fact.
Biden is clearly a public figure with a considerable reach in terms of media coverage. He as a public figure has a duty to be factual in what he says to the maximum extent possible.
Rittenhouse is not a White supremacist, and is not and never has been associated with any White supremacist group. That too is a fact.
Biden has a large staff that can do things like fact check material and inform him of facts before he speaks on a matter.


https://legal-dictionary.thefreedic...making,libel and, if only oral, it is slander.

A Biden has never retracted that statement, nor has he or his staff apologized and retracted it, it amounts to a public figure making an intentionally false communication. That false communication has been widely repeated by other parts of the media without correction. This is prima facie evidence that Biden in making that statement defamed Rittenhouse.

It's also par for the course that a mental midget who plagiarized his way through his simple liberal arts degree in law, among other plagiarizations, who has shown a frequent inability to speak coherently, and says thing that are just short of insane, would motorboat his mouth in this case defaming Rittenhouse expecting no retribution for his idiotic and hateful comments.
Click to expand...

Simply UNTRUE, where is the Biden quote?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top