poor venezuela

Here's a frightening thought: what will he do when he loses the election? Will he have enough support from the army and those closest to him to impose martial law? Poor Venezuela indeed.
 
this is a prime example of what happens when you socialize things...hugo is a nut case...and if many of obama's agenda's go through we could look just like venezuela
 
Thorn said:
Here's a frightening thought: what will he do when he loses the election? Will he have enough support from the army and those closest to him to impose martial law? Poor Venezuela indeed.
Click to expand...

A good question. My guess would be that the Army has some other ambitious individual who will stage a counter coup if Chavez loses and tries to maintain control anyway.
 
Is it possible for Hugo to win the election?

I just wish there were a rational voice on the left in Ven. As long as Hugo keeps acting like this, I'd have to ally myself with the right and whoever would vote against him.
 
Mr. Spite said:
Is it possible for Hugo to win the election?

I just wish there were a rational voice on the left in Ven. As long as Hugo keeps acting like this, I'd have to ally myself with the right and whoever would vote against him.
Click to expand...

Perhaps not a fair election, but ...
 
Mr. Spite said:
Is it possible for Hugo to win the election?

I just wish there were a rational voice on the left in Ven. As long as Hugo keeps acting like this, I'd have to ally myself with the right and whoever would vote against him.
Click to expand...

I wish you were as level headed when it came to US politics.....
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
And the beat goes on.


Venezuela is Not Greece
Posted: Friday, May 7, 2010

Given the Venezuelan government's low public and foreign debt, the idea the country is facing an 'economic crisis' is plain wrong

by Mark Weisbrot

http://www.trinicenter.com/venezuela/
Click to expand...

Superfreak said:
so to you... DEBT is the only way a country can experience an economic crisis???

Hmm....
Click to expand...

Did I say that? Nope.

Did the article say that? Nope.

I'm just giving a little balance here....please try to maintain at least a little honesty in the discussion, if not objectivity.
 
Yurt said:
he already took over gm....and rode to office on a wave of anti rich people sentiment...very similar to hugo...why is that so worrying?
Click to expand...

I think the wave he rode was an anti-George W. sentiment.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Translation: the Post Modern Fool dare not honestly deal with information that takes the wind out of his neocon sails, so like his buddy T&A, what he can't handle he dodges....Post Modern Pathetic is more like it.
Click to expand...

Fuck you asshole neocon!! I hadn't even posted on this thread until you mentioned my name!!!

You still can't explain why the GOP continues to lead the field in crucial wedge issues, despite the so-called disappearance of the Radical Republicans.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Translation: the Post Modern Fool dare not honestly deal with information that takes the wind out of his neocon sails, so like his buddy T&A, what he can't handle he dodges....Post Modern Pathetic is more like it.
Click to expand...

T&A said:
Fuck you asshole neocon!! I hadn't even posted on this thread until you mentioned my name!!!

You still can't explain why the GOP continues to lead the field in crucial wedge issues, despite the so-called disappearance of the Radical Republicans.
Click to expand...

1. Obviously, I made the error of confusing T&A with SuperFreak. I humbly apologize for any mental trauma that T&A may have suffered from this erroneous association.

2. Since my numerous posts and threads have stated everything BUT a conservative point of view that can be related to the GOP or the current right wing punditry or fringe elements like the teabaggers, T&A's accusation that I'm a "neocon" logically does not make sense.

3. T&A's claim that the GOP has been a leader in "wedge" issues is misleading (his alluding to the GOP being of a "positive" action)...since the leadership under Nixon, Reagan and the Bush family has been anything but positive in progressing the benefits and rights of the middle and working class against that of the corporation and finacial institutions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top