Please, pundits, stop trying to predict the future. You’re bad at it.

BidenPresident

Verified User
“The Jan. 6 committee has already blown it,” decided David Brooks, who holds one of those New York Times appointments as an op-ed columnist that rival the Supreme Court in their tenure. That was the headline of his column in early June, a few days before the first televised hearing,"

As it happened, though, the hearings haven’t “blown it” by any measure. Millions of Americans are watching, many are riveted, and the testimony is clearly important for accountability.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2022/07/06/pundits-wrong-roe-abortion-jan6-trump/
 
“Nancy Pelosi just doomed the already tiny chances of the 1/6 committee actually mattering,” wrote CNN’s Chris Cillizza last summer.

“If you ever held any hope that the House select committee … might … help us understand what happened in the lead-up to that day and, in so doing, provide us avenues to keep it from happening again, you should give up those hopes now.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2022/07/06/pundits-wrong-roe-abortion-jan6-trump/
 
In the bad-takes Hall of Fame, though, it’s hard to top Mick Mulvaney’s prediction in a Wall Street Journal op-ed piece that Trump — whom he served for a time as acting chief of staff — would do the right thing if Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election.

“If He Loses, Trump Will Concede Gracefully,” the headline asserted.

Instead, we got a deadly riot on Jan. 6, 2021, and Trump’s ceaseless campaign to deny the legitimate election results.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2022/07/06/pundits-wrong-roe-abortion-jan6-trump/
 
TRANSLATION: "Please stop reminding us and everyone else what FUCKUPS we are, at everything." - The Entire Stalinist DNC. :laugh:
 
Back
Top