Parents of Michael Brown sue Ferguson MO but refuse to release school records of son

great, lets go to a system that allows the ones with unlimited resources to use attrition tactics to defeat citizens with grievances.
As long as there is an abundance of starving lawyers with no fear of retribution we have a nice system in place that allows stupid lawsuits like MB's parents are doing.
Besides,I'm sure it was some ambulance chaser that approached the parents to do this at no cost to them.

Look at the "argument: "Brown's parents argue in their lawsuit that the death of their son during an August 2014 confrontation with Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson deprived them of financial support through his future potential wages."
That worthless piece of shit was going to support his parents that never gave a shit about him until after he was dead???

Fuck, I had good parents , a good education and make good money and I never supported my parents.
 
Last edited:
As long as there is an abundance of starving lawyers with no fear of retribution we have a nice system in place that allows stupid lawsuits like MB's parents are doing.
Besides,I'm sure it was some ambulance chaser that approached the parents to do this at no cost to them.

Look at the "argument: "Brown's parents argue in their lawsuit that the death of their son during an August 2014 confrontation with Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson deprived them of financial support through his future potential wages."
That worthless piece of shit was going to support his parents that never gave a shit about him until after he was dead???

Fuck, I had good parents , a good education and make good money and I never supported my parents.

it's why we have a judicial system. it's one of the very few exceptions of qualified immunity that i actually can agree with.
 
So what? What happened in Ferguson was a shame, we had career agitators move in and make a mockery of protest but that doesn't change the fact that Brown was most likely shot under some really fucked up circumstances. Now we're doing a hypothetical cost/benefit analysis of his life?
Most bad killings are 'legal' under local laws, but still lose in civil court. This case will yield the same result. They won't have a prosecutor who gives illegal instructions to a grand jury.
 
He LOST billions of dollars. Most people don't get away with that.

He bested the media and almost 20 republican contenders in the primaries. Then bested the media, again, plus the Clinton machine in the general.

I'm amazed that some people still cling to the idea the man is dumb.
 
He bested the media and almost 20 republican contenders in the primaries. Then bested the media, again, plus the Clinton machine in the general.

I'm amazed that some people still cling to the idea the man is dumb.
Most con artists don't need to be literate. Did you see him try to read at the Al Smith dinner?

He declared personal bankruptcy for almost 1 billion dollars, on top of his 4 corporate bankruptcies.

That's pretty dumb in the business world.
 
Most con artists don't need to be literate. Did you see him try to read at the Al Smith dinner?

He declared personal bankruptcy for almost 1 billion dollars, on top of his 4 corporate bankruptcies.

That's pretty dumb in the business world.

Dumb doesn't equate to being a multi-billionaire in the business world lol.

I didn't vote for a public reader. And I've had my fill of the slick orators after the last 8 years.
 
Most bad killings are 'legal' under local laws, but still lose in civil court. This case will yield the same result. They won't have a prosecutor who gives illegal instructions to a grand jury.

Are you suggesting that this was a "bad killing" and if so, how come?
 
Back
Top