Paranoid panty-pissers posit plot

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
G

Guns Guns Guns

Guest
In the eyes of National Rifle Association (NRA) executive vice president Wayne LaPierre, President Barack Obama's decision not to pursue gun control legislation is a "massive conspiracy," and just another reason not to give him a second term.


LaPierre told an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) Friday "In public, he'll remind us that he's put off calls from his party to renew the Clinton ban, he hasn't pushed for new gun control laws.The president will offer the Second Amendment lip service and hit the campaign trail saying he's actually been good for the Second Amendment."


"But it's a big fat stinking lie!" the NRA leader exclaimed. "It's all part of a massive Obama conspiracy to deceive voters and destroy the Second Amendment in our country."



:palm:
 
In the eyes of National Rifle Association (NRA) executive vice president Wayne LaPierre, President Barack Obama's decision not to pursue gun control legislation is a "massive conspiracy," and just another reason not to give him a second term.


LaPierre told an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) Friday "In public, he'll remind us that he's put off calls from his party to renew the Clinton ban, he hasn't pushed for new gun control laws.The president will offer the Second Amendment lip service and hit the campaign trail saying he's actually been good for the Second Amendment."


"But it's a big fat stinking lie!" the NRA leader exclaimed. "It's all part of a massive Obama conspiracy to deceive voters and destroy the Second Amendment in our country."



:palm:

What is wrong with that guy? He sounds wacko.
 
What is wrong with that guy? He sounds wacko.

Are you implying Democrats have not in the past tried to legislate a number of regulations that would 'erode' the rights given in the second amendment.....like taxing and restricting the purchase of bullets, gun powder and ammunition....among other things.....
 
Wayne LaPierre, the executive vice president of the National Rifle Association, gave me a call at home the other day.


In the taped message, my friend Wayne warned me that unless I and other patriotic Americans stepped forward to stop it, the dastardly United Nations, with Iran, China, North Korea and other evil countries behind it, would soon come into our country and into our very homes, strip the Second Amendment out of the Constitution and “take away every pistol, and rifle and shotgun” that we owned.


Riiiggghhht. I just have one question though:


How is the UN going to accomplish this? Are they going to import little bulbous-headed men from Mars toting rayguns to take away our weapons?


Look, I recognize that the boundary between serious and seriously crazy has shifted considerably in recent years. But doesn’t this kind of nonsense still qualify on the fully crazy side of the ledger?


The ostensible cause of LaPierre’s hysteria is something called the International Arms Trade Treaty.


If ratified by the United Nations and then by the U.S. Senate, it would require countries exporting conventional arms to certify that the weapons aren’t being sent to a terrorist or organized crime group, such as Hezbollah, and that they aren’t being sent to a nation conducting genocide or to a nation under a U.N. arms embargo, such as Iran and North Korea.


It would have no effect whatsoever on domestic ownership, possession or purchase of firearms.


Such a claim is politically, practically, legally and constitutionally absurd.


So why is Wayne LaPierre calling me and others to pretend otherwise?


Money is part of the reason.


The United States accounts for 40 percent of the world’s exports of conventional arms, and the U.S. arms industry is nervous about legislation that might curtail their right to sell arms to whomever they wish.


Those manufacturers, not coincidentally, are also heavy donors to the NRA, which is trying to whip up hysteria on their behalf.


In addition, such hysteria is part of the NRA’s own strategy for raising money for its coffers.


Once the LaPierre robo-rant about the UN finished, for example, an operator quickly came on line to ask me to donate money to the NRA.


I politely declined.


Finally, it’s also a matter of increasingly delusional paranoia infecting the NRA.


Prior to the ‘08 election, the gun group warned its members that Barack Obama had a scret 10-point plan to end gun ownership in this country.


As you may recall, that bit of hysteria touched off quite a spree of gun-buying after the election, boosting the profits of the NRA’s sponsors in the gun industry.


In fact, as ammunition disappeared from store shelves, that itself was quickly cited as evidence that ammo confiscation was already underway. The NRA, in other words, played its own members for patsies.


Today, three years later, none of that has come to pass.


Obama has made no effort whatsoever to alter the nation’s gun laws. So, given their hyperbolic claims, you might think that would make LaPierre and others a little embarrassed, right?


Well, no.


In a speech at a conservative conference in Florida this month, LaPierre explained that by taking no action to implement his alleged 10-point program, Obama had actually proved that the NRA had been right all along.



http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-bl...ayne-lapierre/?cxntfid=blogs_jay_bookman_blog
 
Are you implying Democrats have not in the past tried to legislate a number of regulations that would 'erode' the rights given in the second amendment.....like taxing and restricting the purchase of bullets, gun powder and ammunition....among other things.....

1:20 to 1:40. The video \(\(=)/)/ posted. Obama hasn't renewed Clinton's gun ban. He hasn't pushed for new gun control laws. He hasn't objected to Congress passing gun bills.

Then the speaker says it's all a conspiracy! By not interfering with gun owners Obama is involved in a conspiracy. Obama's plan is to get reelected and then get rid of the Second Amendment.

My point in saying the guy sounds wacko is he's associating Obama's lack of initiative fighting for gun control is evidence he wants gun control. If we turn that around would Obama's fight for gun control mean he's not for gun control?

The speaker is illogical. There's conspiracy and there's just plain idiocy.
 
1:20 to 1:40. The video \(\(=)/)/ posted. Obama hasn't renewed Clinton's gun ban. He hasn't pushed for new gun control laws. He hasn't objected to Congress passing gun bills. Then the speaker says it's all a conspiracy! By not interfering with gun owners Obama is involved in a conspiracy. Obama's plan is to get reelected and then get rid of the Second Amendment. My point in saying the guy sounds wacko is he's associating Obama's lack of initiative fighting for gun control is evidence he wants gun control. If we turn that around would Obama's fight for gun control mean he's not for gun control? The speaker is illogical. There's conspiracy and there's just plain idiocy.

Maybe that's why it appealed to Blabo.

Poor Blabo.
 
Back
Top