Oklahoma to require schools to teach Trump's 2020 election conspiracy theories

signalmankenneth

Verified User
WTF! Oklahoma schools should be required to teach about the 1921 Tulsa Massacre, not 2020 election conspiracy theories/falsehoods?!!

Oklahoma's public school history teachers will soon be required to teach the disproved conspiracy theory that the Democratic Party stole the 2020 presidential election from President Donald Trump.

The Republican-led state's new high school history curriculum says students must learn how to dissect the results of the 2020 election, including learning about alleged mail-in voter fraud, "an unforeseen record number of voters" and "security risks of mail-in balloting."

Advancing Trump's debunked claims about his 2020 presidential election loss on young people is one of many changes made by State Superintendent of Education Ryan Walters, including requiring bibles in every classroom. The new curriculum also removed a prior proposal for lessons about George Floyd's murder and Black Lives Matter, and teaches as fact the hotly contested theory that COVID-19 emerged from a lab leak.

"These reforms will reset our classrooms back to educating our children without liberal indoctrination," Walters, a former history teacher, wrote in a post on X on April 29. "We’re proud to defend these standards, and we will continue to stand up for honest, pro-America education in every classroom."

The new curriculum was drafted by a review committee that includes Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, a Washington D.C.-based conservative think tank that created the blueprint for a second Trump term, known as Project 2025 and conservative talk show host Dennis Prager.

Parents, teachers, Democrats, and even some Republicans in staunchly conservative Oklahoma, oppose the new social studies lessons.

"Many of the late additions include historically inaccurate content and do not align with the inclusive, evidence-based approach that is essential to high-quality social studies instruction," wrote Heather Goodenough, the president of the Council for Social Studies, in a public statement.

The Oklahoma Department of Education and Walters' office did responded to an inquiry from USA TODAY.


What is Oklahoma's new social studies standard?​

Oklahoma's new history standards will start in the 2025-2026 school year.

Students must be able to "identify discrepancies in 2020 elections results by looking at graphs and other information, including the sudden halting of ballot-counting in select cities in key battleground states, the security risks of mail-in balloting, sudden batch dumps, an unforeseen record number of voters, and the unprecedented contradiction of ‘bellwether county’ trends," the new standard reads.

Teachers must adjust their current curriculum to teach the lessons.


Why is it so controversial?​

Former Democratic President Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election with 306 electoral votes and a 7 million-vote margin in the popular vote.

The right-wing myth that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Trump, sometimes called the "Big Lie," emerged from Trump's efforts to overturn his defeat.

The allegations have been disproven through numerous audits and recounts in several states, court dismissals of lawsuits filed by Trump and his supporters, forensic audits of voting machines and partisan reviews.

"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history," said the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency in a November 2020 statement. "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes or was in any way compromised."

Some Republican lawmakers have also pushed back on claims of widespread fraud.

"Nothing before us proves illegality anywhere near the massive scale, the massive scale that would have tipped the entire election," said Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the GOP leader in the Senate at the time.

Fact check:
How we know the 2020 election results were legitimate, not 'rigged' as Donald Trump claims

Trump's bogus claims of a stolen election incited his supporters' violent insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Trump continued to make false statements about the 2020 election throughout Biden's term, such as wrongly asserting in 2022 that a Pennsylvania court ruling in a case about that year's midterm elections held that the 2020 election was "Rigged." In the second 2024 presidential debate, Trump incorrectly asserted that none of the more than 60 cases he lost in court over the 2020 election were decided on the merits. In fact, 30 were.

The accusations of electoral fraud have become very widely accepted by Republican voters although they're rejected by many Republican legal experts and GOP-appointed judges.

About one-third of Americans still believed the election was stolen from Trump in Sept. 2023 and a majority of the believers are Republican, according to a survey of about 2,500 adults from the nonprofit, nonpartisan organization Public Religion Research Institute.


What are people saying about it?​

Oklahoma's new social studies standards are welcomed by Sarah Parshall Perry, vice president and legal fellow at the conservative nonprofit organization Defending Education.

She said the move shows "the power of a state to transform its education through curriculum" and applauded Walters for "leading the way."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/oklahoma-require-schools-teach-trumps-090608911.html
1747949135832.png
1747949160653.png
 
WTF! Oklahoma schools should be required to teach about the 1921 Tulsa Massacre, not 2020 election conspiracy theories/falsehoods?!!

Oklahoma's public school history teachers will soon be required to teach the disproved conspiracy theory that the Democratic Party stole the 2020 presidential election from President Donald Trump.

The Republican-led state's new high school history curriculum says students must learn how to dissect the results of the 2020 election, including learning about alleged mail-in voter fraud, "an unforeseen record number of voters" and "security risks of mail-in balloting."

Advancing Trump's debunked claims about his 2020 presidential election loss on young people is one of many changes made by State Superintendent of Education Ryan Walters, including requiring bibles in every classroom. The new curriculum also removed a prior proposal for lessons about George Floyd's murder and Black Lives Matter, and teaches as fact the hotly contested theory that COVID-19 emerged from a lab leak.

"These reforms will reset our classrooms back to educating our children without liberal indoctrination," Walters, a former history teacher, wrote in a post on X on April 29. "We’re proud to defend these standards, and we will continue to stand up for honest, pro-America education in every classroom."

The new curriculum was drafted by a review committee that includes Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, a Washington D.C.-based conservative think tank that created the blueprint for a second Trump term, known as Project 2025 and conservative talk show host Dennis Prager.

Parents, teachers, Democrats, and even some Republicans in staunchly conservative Oklahoma, oppose the new social studies lessons.

"Many of the late additions include historically inaccurate content and do not align with the inclusive, evidence-based approach that is essential to high-quality social studies instruction," wrote Heather Goodenough, the president of the Council for Social Studies, in a public statement.

The Oklahoma Department of Education and Walters' office did responded to an inquiry from USA TODAY.


What is Oklahoma's new social studies standard?​

Oklahoma's new history standards will start in the 2025-2026 school year.

Students must be able to "identify discrepancies in 2020 elections results by looking at graphs and other information, including the sudden halting of ballot-counting in select cities in key battleground states, the security risks of mail-in balloting, sudden batch dumps, an unforeseen record number of voters, and the unprecedented contradiction of ‘bellwether county’ trends," the new standard reads.

Teachers must adjust their current curriculum to teach the lessons.


Why is it so controversial?​

Former Democratic President Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election with 306 electoral votes and a 7 million-vote margin in the popular vote.

The right-wing myth that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Trump, sometimes called the "Big Lie," emerged from Trump's efforts to overturn his defeat.

The allegations have been disproven through numerous audits and recounts in several states, court dismissals of lawsuits filed by Trump and his supporters, forensic audits of voting machines and partisan reviews.

"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history," said the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency in a November 2020 statement. "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes or was in any way compromised."

Some Republican lawmakers have also pushed back on claims of widespread fraud.

"Nothing before us proves illegality anywhere near the massive scale, the massive scale that would have tipped the entire election," said Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the GOP leader in the Senate at the time.

Fact check:
How we know the 2020 election results were legitimate, not 'rigged' as Donald Trump claims

Trump's bogus claims of a stolen election incited his supporters' violent insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Trump continued to make false statements about the 2020 election throughout Biden's term, such as wrongly asserting in 2022 that a Pennsylvania court ruling in a case about that year's midterm elections held that the 2020 election was "Rigged." In the second 2024 presidential debate, Trump incorrectly asserted that none of the more than 60 cases he lost in court over the 2020 election were decided on the merits. In fact, 30 were.

The accusations of electoral fraud have become very widely accepted by Republican voters although they're rejected by many Republican legal experts and GOP-appointed judges.

About one-third of Americans still believed the election was stolen from Trump in Sept. 2023 and a majority of the believers are Republican, according to a survey of about 2,500 adults from the nonprofit, nonpartisan organization Public Religion Research Institute.


What are people saying about it?​

Oklahoma's new social studies standards are welcomed by Sarah Parshall Perry, vice president and legal fellow at the conservative nonprofit organization Defending Education.

She said the move shows "the power of a state to transform its education through curriculum" and applauded Walters for "leading the way."


https://www.yahoo.com/news/oklahoma-require-schools-teach-trumps-090608911.html
View attachment 51078
View attachment 51079
Fuck you asshole. You supported the assassination of your president so, fuck you!
 
Since the 2nd coming of Cheeto Jeezus, the christo-fascist factions in America are smelling blood .... and their pushing their twisted agendas with proud arrogance knowing that the President, the Congress (for now) and the SCOTUS (for now) has their back.

But what the damned fools didn't realize (or will die before admitting) is that it's their very own "leaders" and their brethren's beliefs that are screwing them over.

Case in point, Oklahoma. With a STATE population that's HALF the size of NEW YORK CITY, they are now looking at diminished disaster relief from FEMA ... relief that was allocated in the Biden administration, but is being screwed with by the Trump/Musk/Doge cluster fuck.

And if THAT'S not bad enough, you have a real fundamentalist/theocratic POS running their state education system. Here's what that clown is doing. Good luck, Oklahoma.....remember that you voted for this:

Ryan Walters Is Trying to Out-MAGA His Peers and It’s Making Things Awkward in Oklahoma​


oklahomawatch.org/2025/02/19/ryan-walters-is-trying-to-out-maga-his-peers-and-its-making-things-awkward-in-oklahoma/
 

The originators of CRT are all avowed Marxists, that is impossible to deny.


In 1937, Max Horkheimer of the Frankfurt School wrote a manifesto about "critical theory," in which he claimed that when examining society, people cannot reason objectively. In classic Marxist fashion, critical theory divides everyone in society into classes of oppressed and oppressors, but posits that the so-called oppressed stand in the way of revolution when they adhere to the societal belief systems and cultural norms of their so-called oppressors. Therefore, the cultural institutions that stand in the way of the Marxist revolution must be destroyed through relentless criticism (hence the name: critical theory).

This is crucial because by the 1930s, Marxists were realizing that Karl Marx's vision of a worker-led revolution wasn't going to sweep the West.

Of course the Marxists blamed workers. Antonio Gramsci, the founder of the Italian Communist Party, claimed the workers had not successfully revolted because they still relied on institutions of the ruling class like the family, religion and country. Gramsci's observation took critical theory one step further. Gramsci posited that workers needed to be "re-educated" in order to overthrow the capitalist systems that were allegedly stymying the worker-led Marxist revolution.

How did this Marxist ideology infiltrate American society?

When Horkheimer and his fellow Marxists fled Germany to escape the Nazis, they found refuge at Columbia University. Horkheimer returned to Germany after the world defeated the Nazis, but left behind his associate, Herbert Marcuse. It was Marcuse who helped morph critical theory into critical race theory in the United States, by identifying a new "worker" for the revolution who could be re-educated to overthrow societal norms: racial minorities.

In the words of Marcuse, "Underneath the conservative popular base is the substratum of the outcasts and outsiders, the exploited and persecuted of other races and other colors." According to Marcuse, "their opposition is revolutionary even if their consciousness is not."

Since a worker-led revolution wasn't happening, they needed another "oppressed" class to serve their purpose. That purpose was to tear down Western institutions that stood in the way of revolt and stage a Marxist revolution. Using racial minorities as their new vanguard would be brilliant. Who better to re-educate than a demographic of people whose ancestors had suffered oppression in America based on their skin color? Who better to paint as victims of a belief system of the "oppressors" and to claim the only way to liberation was to demolish the institutions of the oppressors?

In other words, the designers and adherents of critical theory admitted their true intent. Not equality under the law. Not civil rights. Not freedom, liberty and justice for all. Not a better life for racial minorities. Critical theorists admit their intent is to use racial minorities as the vanguard for a Marxist revolution.

Thus, critical race theory was born.

We now see this slimy ideology creeping into every aspect of American life, from corporations staging "white privilege" trainings to school curricula that teach students to view everything and everybody through the prism of race.

Why does critical race theory peddle bigoted and obviously false assumptions about individuals based on their skin color? Not pure racial hatred. Racialism is a tactic, a tool used by critical race theorists to tear down American institutions. Their aims: abolish the nuclear family, abolish gender, defund the police, abolish the border, abolish prisons, abolish the Senate, abolish the Electoral College, abolish ICE, abolish voter ID, abolish capitalism, abolish private/charter schools, abolish religious freedom, abolish free speech, abolish rights, abolish objective truth, abolish reality.

Sound familiar? Democratic political agenda items are textbook critical race theory. We should reject its reduction of people to the color of their skin. It's a tool with a dangerously clear purpose: to impose simple, unadulterated Marxism in the United States of America. We must overwhelmingly reject it in its entirety on the basis of what it really is.

 
The originators of CRT are all avowed Marxists, that is impossible to deny.


In 1937, Max Horkheimer of the Frankfurt School wrote a manifesto about "critical theory," in which he claimed that when examining society, people cannot reason objectively. In classic Marxist fashion, critical theory divides everyone in society into classes of oppressed and oppressors, but posits that the so-called oppressed stand in the way of revolution when they adhere to the societal belief systems and cultural norms of their so-called oppressors. Therefore, the cultural institutions that stand in the way of the Marxist revolution must be destroyed through relentless criticism (hence the name: critical theory).

This is crucial because by the 1930s, Marxists were realizing that Karl Marx's vision of a worker-led revolution wasn't going to sweep the West.

Of course the Marxists blamed workers. Antonio Gramsci, the founder of the Italian Communist Party, claimed the workers had not successfully revolted because they still relied on institutions of the ruling class like the family, religion and country. Gramsci's observation took critical theory one step further. Gramsci posited that workers needed to be "re-educated" in order to overthrow the capitalist systems that were allegedly stymying the worker-led Marxist revolution.

How did this Marxist ideology infiltrate American society?

When Horkheimer and his fellow Marxists fled Germany to escape the Nazis, they found refuge at Columbia University. Horkheimer returned to Germany after the world defeated the Nazis, but left behind his associate, Herbert Marcuse. It was Marcuse who helped morph critical theory into critical race theory in the United States, by identifying a new "worker" for the revolution who could be re-educated to overthrow societal norms: racial minorities.

In the words of Marcuse, "Underneath the conservative popular base is the substratum of the outcasts and outsiders, the exploited and persecuted of other races and other colors." According to Marcuse, "their opposition is revolutionary even if their consciousness is not."

Since a worker-led revolution wasn't happening, they needed another "oppressed" class to serve their purpose. That purpose was to tear down Western institutions that stood in the way of revolt and stage a Marxist revolution. Using racial minorities as their new vanguard would be brilliant. Who better to re-educate than a demographic of people whose ancestors had suffered oppression in America based on their skin color? Who better to paint as victims of a belief system of the "oppressors" and to claim the only way to liberation was to demolish the institutions of the oppressors?

In other words, the designers and adherents of critical theory admitted their true intent. Not equality under the law. Not civil rights. Not freedom, liberty and justice for all. Not a better life for racial minorities. Critical theorists admit their intent is to use racial minorities as the vanguard for a Marxist revolution.

Thus, critical race theory was born.

We now see this slimy ideology creeping into every aspect of American life, from corporations staging "white privilege" trainings to school curricula that teach students to view everything and everybody through the prism of race.

Why does critical race theory peddle bigoted and obviously false assumptions about individuals based on their skin color? Not pure racial hatred. Racialism is a tactic, a tool used by critical race theorists to tear down American institutions. Their aims: abolish the nuclear family, abolish gender, defund the police, abolish the border, abolish prisons, abolish the Senate, abolish the Electoral College, abolish ICE, abolish voter ID, abolish capitalism, abolish private/charter schools, abolish religious freedom, abolish free speech, abolish rights, abolish objective truth, abolish reality.

Sound familiar? Democratic political agenda items are textbook critical race theory. We should reject its reduction of people to the color of their skin. It's a tool with a dangerously clear purpose: to impose simple, unadulterated Marxism in the United States of America. We must overwhelmingly reject it in its entirety on the basis of what it really is.

Nothing is more comical than watching a racist reprehensible insipidly parrot the "facts and logic" concocted by his like minded brethren in order to justify a push towards a christo-fascist government under Cheeto Jeezus.

For those interested in THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, take note of the following:

Fact Check: 3 Common Claims About Critical Race Theory​



... Anti-critical race theory activists point to what many scholars see as an important antecedent of critical race theory: critical legal studies, which in turn draws on the writings of Michel Foucault, Max Weber and—yes—Karl Marx.

According to the authors of Critical Race Theory: Key Writings That Formed The Movement, critical race theory formed in the 1980s, when a group of scholars of color broke off from their white, leftist colleagues in critical legal studies.

“Critical race theory sort of breaks off from critical legal studies, because critical legal studies didn't really conceptualize race,” University of Louisville Law School professor Cedric Powell said.

Where critical legal theorists saw laws as primarily reflecting and sustaining class interests, critical race theorists argued that laws construct and maintain a racial power hierarchy.

“It sort of draws upon this underlying notion of class, this underlying notion of power and social control, and takes that and critiques the criminal law, which is supposed to be neutral, but looked at its impact on subordinating people of color,” Powell said.


For example, Powell said, a critical race theorist may look at the overrepresentation of Black people in jails and prisons as evidence that criminal laws are “deeply implicated in sustaining racial subordination.”

But does the fact that critical race theory draws on the writings of Karl Marx make it Marxism?


Powell says no.


“To say that it is totally Marxist is absolutist. I think any academic discipline draws on different theories,” he said.


Furthermore, highlighting critical race theory’s ties to Marxism is a familiar scare tactic, says Nikki Brown, history professor at the University of Kentucky.

“If you’re a historian of the civil rights movement, that sounds eerily familiar because many civil rights activists, including Martin Luther King, were accused of being Communists because they wanted equality.

Critical race theorists are not calling for a violent overthrow of the government, as has been suggested by some conservatives.

“Critical race theory calls for the dismantling of structural inequality,” Powell said. “Critical race theorists believe in the government. They just believe that if the government is making all of these promises, it should certainly keep them. And they haven't kept them.”


www.lpm.org/news/2021-07-09/fact-check-3-common-claims-about-critical-race-theory
 
Back
Top