'Occupy' Wallstreet gets more violent by the day

Cancel 2018. 3

<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
why is this? and why is the movement called 'occupy'?

what are they occupying? what are they taking over? have they declared war? occupy - words have meaning.
 
He is on it, that is why we avoid it.

exactly...........must IGNORE the violence when you agree with their political stance

and then must FOCUS on the violence (if any) when you don't agree with their political stance

you and onceler are so predictable.
 
exactly...........must IGNORE the violence when you agree with their political stance

and then must FOCUS on the violence (if any) when you don't agree with their political stance

you and onceler are so predictable.

But you do that very thing, don't you?
 
sure.....sure thing onceler

yep....you didn't comment and you sure jumped in there to defend the left wing smear

good lord............could you possibly be a bigger hack?

I didn't comment much on the copious TEA threads; only when I had a legit observation. I also don't comment too much on the OWS threads.

There was a group of posters - we know who they are - who were obsessed with TEA, and posted constantly about it. There is also a group of posters (and think hard on this one), who are obsessed with OWS, and post constantly about that movement.

It's funny how similar you are to those you criticize. Almost identical, actually.
 
your delusions are not truth onceler.

sorry.

Conservative guesstimate. How many threads do you think you have started on OWS at this point?

It would be easy to look up, but I'm just curious what you think the # is. Ballpark.
 
Onceler;906239]I didn't comment much on the copious TEA threads; only when I had a legit observation. I also don't comment too much on the OWS threads.

exactly my point hack. you whine about others, but are guilty yourself. pull the plank out of your own eye before whining about others.



There was a group of posters - we know who they are - who were obsessed with TEA, and posted constantly about it. There is also a group of posters (and think hard on this one), who are obsessed with OWS, and post constantly about that movement.

It's funny how similar you are to those you criticize. Almost identical, actually.

find one post where you hounded or even commented on the obsession about someone creating tea party threads.

you won't, you never do. you make claims and then run away, unless, you know for a fact you're right.
 
Conservative guesstimate. How many threads do you think you have started on OWS at this point?

It would be easy to look up, but I'm just curious what you think the # is. Ballpark.

how many times did you ask liberals the same question?

just curious....ballpark figure is fine with me.

answer me and i will answer you.
 
exactly my point hack. you whine about others, but are guilty yourself. pull the plank out of your own eye before whining about others.





find one post where you hounded or even commented on the obsession about someone creating tea party threads.

you won't, you never do. you make claims and then run away, unless, you know for a fact you're right.

I'm "guilty myself?" What am I guilty of?

Observing that you're as obsessed w/ OWS as anyone who you ever said was obsessed w/ TEA? You are. Them's just the facts.
 
how many times did you ask liberals the same question?

just curious....ballpark figure is fine with me.

answer me and i will answer you.

I figured you wouldn't try to answer. You know the #, and it's pretty large & revealing.

And you're missing the point. You're the one who is posting with the intent of "the TEA party never did this." But your criticism is the same broadside stuff that we saw from the TEA critics on here.

It's exceedingly hypocritical.
 
More violent Indeed?!!

84yr-old-woman-pepper-spray.jpg

The above photo was taken during the recent raid at Occupy Seattle of an 4-foot, 10-inch, 84-year-old activist after she was pepper sprayed by Seattle police dressed in riot gear. While this sounds like the beginning of a bad joke, the following report confirms its all quite true. (Damn?!!)
 
Back
Top