Obama wants to shed rules that hurt job growth

Schadenfreude

patriot and widower
this is an overdue review, however, i am not holding my breath

Associated Press/AP Online

WASHINGTON - President Obama has ordered a review of federal regulations with an eye toward getting rid of those that stifle job creation and hurt economic growth. The president said he will sign an executive order Tuesday telling federal agencies to look for rules that place an unreasonable burden on businesses.
In an opinion column Tuesday in The Wall Street Journal, the president also said he wants his administration to strike a balance between protecting the public and promoting economic growth.

The move is apparently aimed at patching up the Obama administration's relationship with corporate America, which has been reluctant to make investments and hire more people, in part because of uncertainty over government regulations and tax policies.


The new review, Obama wrote, tells agencies to look for outdated regulations that make the U.S. economy less competitive.


"It's a review that will help bring order to regulations that have become a patchwork of overlapping rules, the result of tinkering by administrations and legislators of both parties and the influence of special interests in Washington over decades," Obama wrote.


Federal agencies also won't shy away from addressing gaps in regulations, such as new safety rules for infant formula and procedures that stop preventable infections from spreading in hospitals, Obama wrote.

"We are also making it our mission to root out regulations that conflict, that are not worth the cost, or that are just plain dumb," the president wrote.

Other regulations, such as the Clean Air Act or child labor laws, are necessary to prevent abuse, he wrote, and "strengthen our country without unduly interfering with the pursuit of progress and the growth of our economy," he wrote.

A service of YellowBrix, Inc. .

 
Great idea.

I saw one report on this calling it a move to the center.

I was wondering why ANYONE would think liberals dont want our regulations to actually have fiscally sound regulations.

More proof the media is NOT liberally biased
 
Go fascism.

If a competitive economy means chinese style fascism and wage slavery, we should reject it.

Protectionism is what we need to create jobs, despite what the internationalist fascists say.
 
Great idea.

I saw one report on this calling it a move to the center.

I was wondering why ANYONE would think liberals dont want our regulations to actually have fiscally sound regulations.

More proof the media is NOT liberally biased

YOu're so committed to party over principles that you will support Obama even if he goes completely fascist. Think about what you support, not just who "your guy" is.
 
Great idea.

I saw one report on this calling it a move to the center.

I was wondering why ANYONE would think liberals dont want our regulations to actually have fiscally sound regulations.

More proof the media is NOT liberally biased

What a pinhead hypocrite you are.....if it was the Republicans idea ...trying to rid the business world of stupid and burdensome regulations you'd be bitching and moaning, ranting and raving all over the GD place.....

But I do agree.... a review of federal regulations is long overdue and what a better time than with a Conservative led House.

The very idea being brought up by Obama is practical proof, that rules and regulations instituted by Democrats kill jobs and stifle economic growth....what conservatives have been preaching for decades.
I commend Obama on another good decision. :good4u:
 
The fact remains that if this were a Republican President, liberals would be screaming bloody murder about how he's shafting the "working class" and "lining the pockets of the wealthy."
 
Voltaire, I am not one to jump to conclusions, the new me waits to see what he does, then I will respond. 87% of people's thoughts are negative, 99% of those thoughts never come to fruition. I am learning to channel that energy to what really matters and not waste time on things that will never happen. It has been a very freeing process for me.
I will criticize the process when the results aren't for the betterment of the USA.
 
Voltaire, I am not one to jump to conclusions, the new me waits to see what he does, then I will respond. 87% of people's thoughts are negative, 99% of those thoughts never come to fruition. I am learning to channel that energy to what really matters and not waste time on things that will never happen. It has been a very freeing process for me.
I will criticize the process when the results aren't for the betterment of the USA.

LOL. He's promising to destroy american labor and you're adopting a wait and see policy. LOL> laughable.
 
It's called buying votes, He's starting his 2012 run. And he know's the anti business BS is tired and nobody is buying.
He'll piss off the base, but what are they going to do vote Barracudda?
 
Voltaire, I am not one to jump to conclusions, the new me waits to see what he does, then I will respond. 87% of people's thoughts are negative, 99% of those thoughts never come to fruition. I am learning to channel that energy to what really matters and not waste time on things that will never happen. It has been a very freeing process for me.
I will criticize the process when the results aren't for the betterment of the USA.
You must be disappointed that Obama isn't as freakin' nuts as the pinheads that voted for him.....
Gitmo still going strong.
Still helping Iraq.
Still fighting in Afghanistan.
Keeping Bush tax tables in effect for two more years....
Threatening to lift the liberal boot heel off the necks of businessmen....
Helping 67 Republicans get elected....:)
 
No, going nuts is your job, I just write letters to voice my disappointment.

Talk about three things to waste money on, GITMO, Afghanistan and Iraq!
 
No, going nuts is your job, I just write letters to voice my disappointment.

Talk about three things to waste money on, GITMO, Afghanistan and Iraq!
Don't blame me...I sure didn't vote for him.....
YOU DID, O ' F O O L I S H O N E !


:rofl:
You should have voted a write-in for Angela Davis!
 
You must be disappointed that Obama isn't as freakin' nuts as the pinheads that voted for him.....
Gitmo still going strong.
Still helping Iraq.
Still fighting in Afghanistan.
Keeping Bush tax tables in effect for two more years....
Threatening to lift the liberal boot heel off the necks of businessmen....
Helping 67 Republicans get elected....:)

You forgot " Increased drones into Pakistan"
 
I do not regret my vote, I still feel he is a better President than McCain would have been or ever will be.

I still feel he has done many great things in his tenure, I just don't agree with all he has done or hasn't done.

I still feel is much better than George W Bush who tried to run the USA into the ground before he left office.
 
I do not regret my vote, I still feel he is a better President than McCain would have been or ever will be.

I still feel he has done many great things in his tenure, I just don't agree with all he has done or hasn't done.

I still feel is much better than George W Bush who tried to run the USA into the ground before he left office.

then you obviously do not support tarp :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top