Obama the liar: US says $400M to Iran was contingent on release of prisoners

The Obama administration said Thursday that a $400 million cash payment to Iran seven months ago was contingent on the release of a group of American prisoners.

It is the first time the U.S. has so clearly linked the two events, which critics have painted as a hostage-ransom arrangement.

State Department spokesman John Kirby repeated the administration's line that the negotiations to return the Iranian money — from a military-equipment deal with the U.S.-backed shah in the 1970s — were conducted separately from the talks to free four U.S. citizens in Iran. But he said the U.S. withheld the delivery of the cash as leverage until Iran permitted the Americans to leave the country.

"We had concerns that Iran may renege on the prisoner release," Kirby said, citing delays and mutual mistrust between countries that severed diplomatic relations 36 years ago. As a result, he explained, the U.S. "of course sought to retain maximum leverage until after the American citizens were released. That was our top priority."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-says-...ease-prisoners-194916527--politics.html?nhp=1

No scandal here. Nothing to see. That is what Obama supporters said, right?

The writing on the wall is clear, this was ransom. Obama just made Americans less safe.
 
If 400 million turned into 1.3 billion in interest, no wonder the rich get richer. I'm sure that is a fairly low interest rate to.
 
Interesting comment:

user62448 minutes ago
The money comes from an account used by the Iranian government to buy American military equipment in the days of the shah. The equipment was never delivered after the shah's government was overthrown in 1979 and revolutionaries took American hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran.
After reading the above statement I do not for the life of me understand why we would agree to release money that does not belong to the existing thugs running Iran.
When they overthrew the friendly government we were negotiating with that should have been accepted as a loss as a result of the coup...
I mean the way this sounds it is like maybe you know your neighbor is in negotiations with the local store and pays money up front for x items, you then kill your neighbor, take his house and find the contract then demand that the store return the money with interest for items never received .....
Show Replies (1)Reply
 
Back
Top