Obama: Syrian Refugees (potential ISIS) are like Mayflower pilgrims !

Raptor

Verified User
Got this from Frontage Nov 27, 2015:

"Obama: Syrian refugees are like pilgrims on the Mayflower (a Thanksgiving thread)
By Doug Powers • November 27, 2015 12:30 PM

Did everybody have a good Thanksgiving? You’re probably still finishing up leftovers so here’s an open thread for those who aren’t out in the post-Thanksgiving shopping madness.

A few things to kick it off…

In his weekly address that aired on Thanksgiving, President Obama really used the occasion to keep selling his call to bring thousands of Syrian refugees to the U.S.:

President Obama used his weekly address to appeal to families counting their blessings on Thanksgiving, reminding Americans that the holiday isn’t only about turkey but a tribute to the deep immigration history that led to the nation’s founding.

“In 1620, a small band of pilgrims came to this continent, refugees who had fled persecution and violence in their native land,” Obama says. “Nearly 400 years later, we remember their part in the American story – and we honor the men and women who helped them in their time of need.”

So the Mayflower pilgrims were also fleeing climate change? Gee, you learn something new every day!
 
Got this from Frontage Nov 27, 2015:

"Obama: Syrian refugees are like pilgrims on the Mayflower (a Thanksgiving thread)
By Doug Powers • November 27, 2015 12:30 PM

Did everybody have a good Thanksgiving? You’re probably still finishing up leftovers so here’s an open thread for those who aren’t out in the post-Thanksgiving shopping madness.

A few things to kick it off…

In his weekly address that aired on Thanksgiving, President Obama really used the occasion to keep selling his call to bring thousands of Syrian refugees to the U.S.:

President Obama used his weekly address to appeal to families counting their blessings on Thanksgiving, reminding Americans that the holiday isn’t only about turkey but a tribute to the deep immigration history that led to the nation’s founding.

“In 1620, a small band of pilgrims came to this continent, refugees who had fled persecution and violence in their native land,” Obama says. “Nearly 400 years later, we remember their part in the American story – and we honor the men and women who helped them in their time of need.”

So the Mayflower pilgrims were also fleeing climate change? Gee, you learn something new every day!

I guess if the pilgrims were hummus eating camel fuckers who worshipped a pedophile then yeah
 
I guess if the pilgrims were hummus eating camel fuckers who worshipped a pedophile then yeah

If Muhammad was a pedo then so were most people in Europe (and later, in America).

What was the ‘Age of Consent’ in European and American history, prior to the 20th century? In this article, I shall bring forth evidences which demonstrate that the ‘Age of consent’ was indeed, very young, even by today’s standards. I will provide academic sources which show that girls were allowed to be married at the age of 10 years old and sometimes times, as young as 7 years old, legally. It was norm just over 100 years ago to see girls being married off at very young ages. In most cultures, the marriage would have been consummated at the onset of puberty.

“In Medieval and early modern European societies, the age of marriage remained low, with documented cases of brides as young as seven years, although marriages were typically not consummated until the girl reached puberty (Bullough 2004). Shakespeare’s Juliet was just 13, and there is no hint in the play that this was considered to be exceptional. The situation was similar on the other side of the Atlantic; Bullough reports the case in 1689 of a nine-year-old bride in Virginia. At the start of the nineteenth century in England, it was legal to have sex with a 10 year-old girl.” [2]

“The law governing the age of consent has changed dramatically in the United States during this century. Most states codified a statutory age of consent during the nineteenth century, and the usual age was ten years.” [4]

http://discover-the-truth.com/2013/09/09/age-of-consent-in-european-american-history/
 
If Muhammad was a pedo then so were most people in Europe (and later, in America).

What was the ‘Age of Consent’ in European and American history, prior to the 20th century? In this article, I shall bring forth evidences which demonstrate that the ‘Age of consent’ was indeed, very young, even by today’s standards. I will provide academic sources which show that girls were allowed to be married at the age of 10 years old and sometimes times, as young as 7 years old, legally. It was norm just over 100 years ago to see girls being married off at very young ages. In most cultures, the marriage would have been consummated at the onset of puberty.

“In Medieval and early modern European societies, the age of marriage remained low, with documented cases of brides as young as seven years, although marriages were typically not consummated until the girl reached puberty (Bullough 2004). Shakespeare’s Juliet was just 13, and there is no hint in the play that this was considered to be exceptional. The situation was similar on the other side of the Atlantic; Bullough reports the case in 1689 of a nine-year-old bride in Virginia. At the start of the nineteenth century in England, it was legal to have sex with a 10 year-old girl.” [2]

“The law governing the age of consent has changed dramatically in the United States during this century. Most states codified a statutory age of consent during the nineteenth century, and the usual age was ten years.” [4]

http://discover-the-truth.com/2013/09/09/age-of-consent-in-european-american-history/

It is fun watching you go out of you way to defend a culture that is counter to everything you believe in

We oppose queer marriage and Muslims throw queers off of buildings yet your have more disdain for me. You don't find anything odd about that?
 
It is fun watching you go out of you way to defend a culture that is counter to everything you believe in

We oppose queer marriage and Muslims throw queers off of buildings yet your have more disdain for me. You don't find anything odd about that?

You want me to *hate* someone's religion because I don't believe its tenets? How about just ignoring it, is that too passive for you?

All Muslims aren't throwing gays off buildings, just the terrorists.
 
You want me to *hate* someone's religion because I don't believe its tenets? How about just ignoring it, is that too passive for you? All Muslims aren't throwing gays off buildings, just the terrorists.

I never knew ILA was so sympathetic to gays.

Maybe it has something to do with his "full proof" plan to avoid pregnancy without giving up sex?

Interesting. I am not telling people not to fuck. But I do know of a full proof way of keeping from getting pregnant.

He says it's not abstinence, so...:eek2:
 
You want me to *hate* someone's religion because I don't believe its tenets? How about just ignoring it, is that too passive for you?

All Muslims aren't throwing gays off buildings, just the terrorists.

Did I say you should hate them? No. I am saying you should stop being blind.

If you want to keep your head in the sand so be it

Those terrorists ARE muslim. Why can't you admit that?

http://www.clarionproject.org/analysis/new-poll-muslim-countries-finds-large-support-terrorists

BTW look how so called moderate Muslims think?

A very high percentage support the aims of the terrorists, but you can choose to ignore that as well
 
Did I say you should hate them? No. I am saying you should stop being blind. If you want to keep your head in the sand so be it
Those terrorists ARE muslim. Why can't you admit that? BTW look how so called moderate Muslims think? A very high percentage support the aims of the terrorists, but you can choose to ignore that as well

Have you ever met, or spoken with a Muslim?

I'll understand if you're ashamed to admit that you haven't, and get all your "information" from bigoted websites.
 
It took along time for the world to wake up to muslime insurrections before the Crusades.

Here is hoping it doesn't take that long again

It was going on long after the Crusades. This countries first encounter with Islamic 'radicalism' was under Jefferson when he/we refused to pay tribute to the Barbary Pirates along the North African trade routes. A form of tribute codified in the Koran.

Kind of the same old same old, historically.
 
You idiots on the right will NOT get the religious war you soooooo want



fuck you vey much you racist assholes
 
Back
Top