Obama: Operation desperate

[Cancel 2016.2]

Well see, that's the thing.

They re-post hate-filled op-ed pieces and then partisans can claim they have proof of this supposed "desperation" and spend the next 48 hours belittling Obama for it.

Hate filled? LMAO...

What they don't point out of course is that this supposed desperation is just one man's OPINION.

Um... in the very OP I pointed out that it was an op-ed. Do try to pay attention, it may help you avoid looking so foolish in the future.

A man who also happens to be a partisan hack out for one thing, to destroy Obama any way possible.

Yeah, how dare he use Obama's own words...

 

[blackascoal]

Well see, that's the thing.

They re-post hate-filled op-ed pieces and then partisans can claim they have proof of this supposed "desperation" and spend the next 48 hours belittling Obama for it.

What they don't point out of course is that this supposed desperation is just one man's OPINION.

A man who also happens to be a partisan hack out for one thing, to destroy Obama any way possible.

Well said brother.

 

[zappasguitar]

Hate filled? LMAO...

"This takes a certain amount of nerve. The Bush years look like a golden age compared to the fiasco of the Obama administration."

Yeah, I'd say that displays a bit of hate.

"Poor widdle Barry!"

No hate there, eh?

"Every time I get one of these emails, I wonder: how bad must Obama’s internal polling be, to cause him to whine and beg in such pathetic fashion?"

It sure wasn't love that drove the author to write this, now was it?

Um... in the very OP I pointed out that it was an op-ed. Do try to pay attention, it may help you avoid looking so foolish in the future.

Correct, and any perceived "desperation" is merely the OPINION of the author.

Yeah, how dare he use Obama's own words...

It's just a shame he couldn't discuss them with an honesty.

 

[CanceledB]

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/08/could-our-president-be-any-whinier.php

Note: this is an op-ed... it is just an opinion article... one I found humorous... thus no need to go attacking the source right out of the gate (dung).

Though if you wish to comment on the content of the op-ed... by all means, join in the mocking.

About the writer of the op-ed, John Hinderaker:

He's a shill for Koch Industries. That in itself is enough for to completely dismiss anything he says or writes, and as such his crap won't be read by me. Additionally, anyone who uses his scum as a cite for anything speaks volumes for what they value and how little they value the Peoples' interests.

Another Koch nominee for Cato’s Board of Directors was right-wing blogger and attorney John Hinderaker, who calls himself a “neocon,” and has described George W. Bush as “a man of extraordinary vision and brilliance approaching to genius.”

Anyone using 'genius' and George W. Bush in the same sentence has highly questionable judgment.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

"This takes a certain amount of nerve. The Bush years look like a golden age compared to the fiasco of the Obama administration."

Yeah, I'd say that displays a bit of hate.

ROFLMAO... you have an odd definition of 'hate'

"Poor widdle Barry!"

No hate there, eh?

Mocking a President = hate???

Again, you should look up what words mean before you use them.

"Every time I get one of these emails, I wonder: how bad must Obama’s internal polling be, to cause him to whine and beg in such pathetic fashion?"

It sure wasn't love that drove the author to write this, now was it?

LOL... so to you every author writes with either love or hate?

Correct, and any perceived "desperation" is merely the OPINION of the author.

Yes, so why the proclamation from you that it wasn't 'mentioned' that it was opinion, when clearly I did indeed point out that it was an op-ed piece?

It's just a shame he couldn't discuss them with an honesty.

Let me guess, by 'honesty' you mean 'in a way I agree with'???