NYT - Pre-published the WRONG VERDICT for Trump's Attempted Assassin...

[Damocles]

Not Guilty? LOL - link

Would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh was declared guilty on Tuesday on all charges, but The New York Times accidentally published the wrong article.

In journalism, outlets often pre-write obituaries, election outcomes and potential court verdicts of major cases before they occur, using the basic facts of the story and adding whatever key details are essential on the day of.


However, a screenshot indicated that the New York Times accidentally published a headline, "Man Found Not Guilty of Trying to Assassinate Trump in Florida." The lede of the now-scrubbed article added, "In a surprise verdict, a federal jury acquitted Ryan Routh of attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate last year. The screenshot also indicated that the article would be published in the print edition on September 24, 2025.

 

[FastLane]

Idots. There was no way Routh was ever going to win.

 

[Hawkeye10]

So many NYT's editors are rolling in their graves with the shit show the once great paper has become.

 

[anonymoose]

So many NYT's editors are rolling in their graves with the shit show the once great paper has become.

I get a subscription. Or more accurately, my wife has it and I get access to it.
It’s almost embarrassing what it’s become.
But I do like the games in the morning.
It’s as if the entire staff is paralyzed with TDS .

 

[Hawkeye10]

I get a subscription. Or more accurately, my wife has it and I get access to it.
It’s almost embarrassing what it’s become.
But I do like the games in the morning.
It’s as if the entire staff is paralyzed with TDS .

About 8 years ago I tried to get back into my habit of reading the Sunday Times......it once was about 3 hours of my Sundays.

I lasted 3 weeks.....it was about as soul crushing as riding Amtrak.

 

[Hawkeye10]

The New Acela is out (years late natch).....the seats are super uncomfortable and the HSR portion of the NEC runs something like 33 miles.

And Amtrak charges hard for it.

Dark Ages Suck.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Not Guilty? LOL - link

Would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh was declared guilty on Tuesday on all charges, but The New York Times accidentally published the wrong article.

In journalism, outlets often pre-write obituaries, election outcomes and potential court verdicts of major cases before they occur, using the basic facts of the story and adding whatever key details are essential on the day of.


However, a screenshot indicated that the New York Times accidentally published a headline, "Man Found Not Guilty of Trying to Assassinate Trump in Florida." The lede of the now-scrubbed article added, "In a surprise verdict, a federal jury acquitted Ryan Routh of attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate last year. The screenshot also indicated that the article would be published in the print edition on September 24, 2025.

Surprise only for terminal suffers of TDS...

 

[martin]

I get a subscription. Or more accurately, my wife has it and I get access to it.
It’s almost embarrassing what it’s become.
But I do like the games in the morning.
It’s as if the entire staff is paralyzed with TDS .

You must not read it. Give it a try. The Times is as good as ever. Try not to confuse news articles with the three percent of the paper given to political opinion columns. As for "pre-written articles and especially obits of prominent people", pre-written means prepared as working drafts for when the news date arrives.

 

[Earl]

You must not read it. Give it a try. The Times is as good as ever. Try not to confuse news articles with the three percent of the paper given to political opinion columns. As for "pre-written articles and especially obits of prominent people", pre-written means prepared as working drafts for when the news date arrives.

No, Marty, the Times is not as good as ever. It is as bad as ever. Totally biased to the far left.

Why do you post such nonsense, Marty? Next, you will tell us that black is white.

You are a hoot, Marty.

Poor Marty.

 

[anonymoose]

You must not read it.

Very little of it.

Give it a try.

I did. Waste of time.

The Times is as good as ever.

Then it never was apparently.

Try not to confuse news articles with the three percent of the paper given to political opinion columns.

The “news articles“ are opinion pieces too, for the most part.
Then there’s People Magazine type nonsense.

As for "pre-written articles and especially obits of prominent people", pre-written means prepared as working drafts for when the news date arrives.

I also get a subscription to The Economist . No comparison.
That’s the real deal.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

So many NYT's editors are rolling in their graves with the shit show the once great paper has become.

this is what happens when you think morality doesn't matter.

your world becomes the hell you sought.

 

[Earl]

Very little of it.

I did. Waste of time.

Then it never was apparently.

The “news articles“ are opinion pieces too, for the most part.
Then there’s People Magazine type nonsense.

I also get a subscription to The Economist . No comparison.
That’s the real deal.

I had a prescription to the Economist for years until it drifted far left. I haven’t read it in years.

I will have to check it out. It had the best writers…outstanding magazine.

My Son-in-Law, who has a PhD in Economics, has a subscription. Their small booklet of the GDP’s of the world’s countries was very helpful.

 

[martin]

So many NYT's editors are rolling in their graves with the shit show the once great paper has become.

The paper continues to be regarded across the globe as one of the finest newspapers in the world, and the best in the U.S. Already this year it has won four Pulitizers including one for its new coverage of the assassination attempt on Trump.

As always, ignoramuses hate it.

 

[anonymoose]

I had a prescription to the Economist for years until it drifted far left.

I’d say it leans slightly left and hardly noticeable but overall it’s quite objective.

I haven’t read it in years.

I will have to check it out. It had the best writers…outstanding magazine.

Indeed

My Son-in-Law, who has a PhD in Economics, has a subscription. Their small booklet of the GDP’s of the world’s countries was very helpful.

 

[Hawkeye10]

I’d say it leans slightly left and hardly noticeable but overall it’s quite objective.

Indeed

The Economist is trash now.

 

[Earl]

The paper continues to be regarded across the globe as one of the finest newspapers in the world, and the best in the U.S. Already this year it has won four Pulitizers including one for its new coverage of the assassination attempt on Trump.

As always, ignoramuses hate it.

Who awards the Pulitzers, Marty.?

The Pulitzer Prizes are awarded annually by Columbia University on the recommendation of the Pulitzer Prize Board. Endowed by newspaper publisher Joseph Pulitzer, these prestigious awards recognize outstanding achievements in American journalism, letters, drama, and music.


It’s the same far left loons that award the Pulitzers, Marty.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Who awards the Pulitzers, Marty.?

The Pulitzer Prizes are awarded annually by Columbia University on the recommendation of the Pulitzer Prize Board. Endowed by newspaper publisher Joseph Pulitzer, these prestigious awards recognize outstanding achievements in American journalism, letters, drama, and music.


It’s the same far left loons that award the Pulitzers, Marty.

About as useless as the Nobel Peace Prize.

 

[Earl]

• Ignoramuses:
  This is the more common and widely accepted plural form, following typical English noun pluralization.
  
  
  
• Ignorami:
  This form is less common but is also considered appropriate, especially in a humorous or colloquial context.
  
  
  
• You could have used either, Walter, but it was ugly. Say you are sorry, Walter.

 

[QP!]

Would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh was declared guilty on Tuesday on all charges, but The New York Times accidentally published the wrong article.

In journalism, outlets often pre-write obituaries, election outcomes and potential court verdicts of major cases before they occur, using the basic facts of the story and adding whatever key details are essential on the day of.


However, a screenshot indicated that the New York Times accidentally published a headline, "Man Found Not Guilty of Trying to Assassinate Trump in Florida." The lede of the now-scrubbed article added, "In a surprise verdict, a federal jury acquitted Ryan Routh of attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate last year. The screenshot also indicated that the article would be published in the print edition on September 24, 2025.

Idots. There was no way Routh was ever going to win.

In the internet age, this is absolutely normal as the first Headline posted, the first video posted get more clicks than the 100Th. As a result of this they will prepare many 'APPROVED' headlines to cover any eventuality even ones they think remote or unlikely as having to wait for approval causes delays.

So the sole reason you guys see this as wrong or idiocy is because you are dumb.

Sorry to say it but it is true.

This is where you will decry 'but it was never going to happen so therefore they should not prepare' and again that is just dumb as remote and unlikely things do happen over enough time and incidents so you prepare since it costs you nothing to do so.

 

[Ross Dolan]

You must not read it. Give it a try. The Times is as good as ever. Try not to confuse news articles with the three percent of the paper given to political opinion columns. As for "pre-written articles and especially obits of prominent people", pre-written means prepared as working drafts for when the news date arrives.

The New York Times is a fine newspaper...and its coverage of the news is excellent. But, THE TRUTH is what MAGA morons call "slanting left" so, since The Times reports the truth, MAGA morons have to bad mouth it. They, morons that they are, think FOX News is what news reporting should be.