NOAA scientist blows the whistle on NOAA

I looked for the other threads on a few pages but no find

This is a pretty big story. Not surprised the warmers ignore it.
 
what i love about this is there is a name. Dr. John Bates. You can easily verify with him and ask follow ups about why the earlier study was wrong. Its not just "unnamed sources"
 
Pay attention, this has already been coveted in two threads already!!

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk

I've been saying on this site its nothing but a hoax for over a decade so I like to hear it over and over......;)
 
I looked for the other threads on a few pages but no find

This is a pretty big story. Not surprised the warmers ignore it.

I posted in that stupid thread of Runes about God and AGW!!

I notice that the usual left wing blogs like Daily Kos are trying to rubbish this, that's totally to be expected. They have been doing this for some years but only now has the mainstream media woken up and seen just how politicised both NOAA and NASA had become under Obama.

https://www.iceagenow.info/noaa-caught-with-its-pants-down-temperature-fraud/

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
what i love about this is there is a name. Dr. John Bates. You can easily verify with him and ask follow ups about why the earlier study was wrong. Its not just "unnamed sources"

There were half a dozen or more who spoke out on East Anglia's ipcc report. But with so little coverage you have to look for it.
The truth is out there despite the cabal's best efforts to hide it.
 
I've been saying on this site its nothing but a hoax for over a decade so I like to hear it over and over......;)

It's not a hoax either but it is the subject of huge exaggerations and often blatant deception. This has been going on for a good while and is now finally being exposed.


2e441644cdf40e1f307eef5d4eb4b7a0.jpg


https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/02/06/monday-mirthiness-noaa-vs-reality/


Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Its amazing this doesnt get more coverage in MSM. I suppose they ignore it because it makes the climate change side look bad.
 
Its amazing this doesnt get more coverage in MSM. I suppose they ignore it because it makes the climate change side look bad.

They would then have to explain how they propagated all this crap from NOAA abandoning any semblance of journalism in the process.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top