"No Sanctuary for Criminals Act"

[Getin the ring]

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-immigration-idUSKBN19K2RH


This is what real immigration reform looks like,
Trump is getting on with the business of Making America Safe Again, liberals can whine all they want but it looks like they might be doing it with empty pockets, Let's see how long the voters put up with the lack of funding for their communities all because a few bleeding hearts want to act PC.

 

[Canceled.2018.1]

Had we upheld our laws this would have never escalated. Letting is slide for so many years gave Trump a way in.

 

[Phantasmal]

People showing ignorance, once again on the concept of sanctuary cities, sanctuary cities do not harbor criminals, they just do not take on the task of enforcing federal laws, that is left to the Feds.

 

[DamnYankee]

People showing ignorance, once again on the concept of sanctuary cities, sanctuary cities do not harbor criminals, they just do not take on the task of enforcing federal laws, that is left to the Feds.

Strawman. These cities refuse to cooperate/ coordinate/ communicate with FedCo, a no-no...

 

[Phantasmal]

Strawman. These cities refuse to cooperate/ coordinate/ communicate with FedCo, a no-no...

It isn't a strawman, learn to use the term correctly.

 

[DamnYankee]

It isn't a strawman, learn to use the term correctly.

Absolutely you presented a straw man. I suggest that you google the term, dear.

 

[Getin the ring]

People showing ignorance, once again on the concept of sanctuary cities, sanctuary cities do not harbor criminals, they just do not take on the task of enforcing federal laws, that is left to the Feds.

did you actually just defend that ^^^^^^

And you wonder why we don't want you snowflakes in charge of anything

 

[Phantasmal]

Absolutely you presented a straw man. I suggest that you google the term, dear.

I have, I suggest you learn the proper application

 

[DamnYankee]

I have, I suggest you learn the proper application

No surprise that you are afraid to admit even a simple truth as this.

 

[cawacko]

People showing ignorance, once again on the concept of sanctuary cities, sanctuary cities do not harbor criminals, they just do not take on the task of enforcing federal laws, that is left to the Feds.

I understand the thinking behind sanctuary cities but what do you consider what SF did with Kate Steinly's killer? This guy was a criminal and they refused to turn him over to the Feds.

 

[Phantasmal]

I understand the thinking behind sanctuary cities but what do you consider what SF did with Kate Steinly's killer? This guy was a criminal and they refused to turn him over to the Feds.

You need to read the ruling on this issue cawacko.

 

[cawacko]

You need to read the ruling on this issue cawacko.

What ruling? I've followed this story since it happened.

 

[Getin the ring]

You need to read the ruling on this issue cawacko.

no, I think Cawako is pretty much spot on. Kate Steinly is dead because of San Franciscos refusal to cooperate with federal authorities on laws of the land.

did we miss something? you're pretty clueless in most things you try and hold a conversation on, are you aware of that?

 

[Phantasmal]

What ruling? I've followed this story since it happened.

I guess you missed this

In a ruling issued Friday, Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero dismissed the family's claims against San Francisco and former Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi.
"No law required the Sheriff's Department to share Lopez-Sanchez's release date with ICE, nor did any law forbid Mirkarimi establishing a policy against such cooperation," Spero wrote.
The magistrate also dismissed the family's claim against ICE.
But he ruled that the family's lawsuit accusing the Bureau of Land Management of negligence can proceed.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...s/kate-steinle-wrongful-death-suit/index.html

 

[cawacko]

I guess you missed this

In a ruling issued Friday, Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero dismissed the family's claims against San Francisco and former Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi.
"No law required the Sheriff's Department to share Lopez-Sanchez's release date with ICE, nor did any law forbid Mirkarimi establishing a policy against such cooperation," Spero wrote.
The magistrate also dismissed the family's claim against ICE.
But he ruled that the family's lawsuit accusing the Bureau of Land Management of negligence can proceed.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...s/kate-steinle-wrongful-death-suit/index.html

If that isn't harboring a criminal then what is?

 

[Phantasmal]

If that isn't harboring a criminal then what is?

You'll have to ask the judge.

 

[cawacko]

You'll have to ask the judge.

It's harboring a criminal no matter what the judge says. One doesn't have to go to law school to understand that

 

[Phantasmal]

It's harboring a criminal no matter what the judge says. One doesn't have to go to law school to understand that

They habored him, lol, that's a bit of a stretch.

 

[cawacko]

They habored him, lol, that's a bit of a stretch.

What do you call it? If you won't turn over someone like that shooter then who would you turn over?

 

[dukkha]

I understand the thinking behind sanctuary cities but what do you consider what SF did with Kate Steinly's killer? This guy was a criminal and they refused to turn him over to the Feds.

that and the fact he was deported,,what..5 times?? WTF?