NIH-Backed Study Examined Effects of Penis Size in Gay Community

[Cancel 2018. 3]

NIH-Backed Study Examined Effects of Penis Size in Gay Community

The federal government helped fund a study that examined what effect a gay man's penis size has on his sex life and general well-being.

The study was among several backed by the National Institutes of Health that have come under scrutiny from a group claiming the agency is wasting valuable tax dollars at a time when the country is trying to control its debt. This particular research resulted in a 2009 report titled, "The Association Between Penis Size and Sexual Health Among Men Who Have Sex with Men."

The study reported, among its findings, that gay men with "below average penises" were more likely to assume a "bottom" sexual position, while those with "above average penises" were more likely to assume a "top" sexual position. Those with average penises identified themselves as "versatile" in the bedroom.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ts-penis-size-in-gay-community/#ixzz1SUtxBbK7



have legion/dune been moonlighting?

seriously though...unbelievable waste of resources

 

[NOVA]

I imagine to Democrats, being obsessed with the homos sex life and general well being, and promoting their perverted behavior, this is money well spent.....
to me its another example of the waste of taxpayers money by liberal/socialist pinheads....

Its no different than:

When taxpayers aren’t shelling out money for homo penis research they’re busy paying for the other projects listed below...

• They supply $175 million a year so the Department of Veterans Affairs can maintain buildings it doesn’t use, including a pink, octagonal monkey house in Dayton, Ohio.
• They pinch pennies so a federal grant program can distribute $1 million to zoos to post bits of poetry to plaques on zoo premises.
• They cushion the federal coffers so the Monkton, VT, Conservation Commission can build a “critter crossing” for $150,000.
• They file honest tax returns so the Internal Revenue Service can deliver $112 million in undeserved tax refunds to prisoners who filed fraudulent returns.
• An estimated $930 million on unnecessary printing, even thousands of unread copies of the mammoth budget of the United States.

The National Science Foundation spent $216,000 to study the use of "ambiguous" statements by politicians. Specifically, the grant description says, the study exams whether candidates, "gain or lose support by taking ambiguous positions."

The Census Bureau blew $2.5 million on a 30-second ad that ran during the Super Bowl. To make matters worse, the ad was almost universally banned, leaving most viewers uncertain of its meaning.

The Department of Agriculture awarded the University of New Hampshire $700,000 this year investigating methane gas emissions from dairy cows.


The examples like these are too numerous to count.