New York Judge Tells Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg His Office Must Testify to Congress

E

Earl

Well-known member
New York Judge Tells Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg His Office Must Testify to Congress

New York Judge Tells Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg His Office Must Testify to Congress April 20, 2023 | Sundance |

Political DA Alvin Bragg was smacked down pretty hard by a New York judge Wednesday, telling his office there is no legal mechanism to avoid accountability and testimony before congress. The DA office took federal funds to prosecute Donald Trump, the DA office is interfering in a federal election, the DA office has openly stated their intentions are politically motivated, and therefore the DA office has no standing to try and avoid federal legislative scrutiny.

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...in-bragg-his-office-must-testify-to-congress/

This is going to be good. They will play video clips of him campaigning on prosecuting Trump as he claims to be unbiased.
 
The DA office took federal funds to prosecute Donald Trump, the DA office is interfering in a federal election, the DA office has openly stated their intentions are politically motivated, and therefore the DA office has no standing to try and avoid federal legislative scrutiny.

As Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil clarified to Bragg’s team, she has no standing to block a legislatively authorized congressional subpoena.

New York – […] “The sole question before the Court at this time is whether Bragg has a legal basis to quash a congressional subpoena that was issued with a valid legislative purpose. He does not,” Vyskocil wrote in her decision Wednesday.

Bragg, a Democrat, has accused Jordan of pursuing the subpoena to score political points while supporting Trump, a Republican. Vyskocil said the dispute appeared political, but said that did not impact her decision.

“In our federalist system, elected state and federal actors sometimes engage in political dogfights,” Vyskocil wrote in her order, noting that Bragg is an elected official. “Bragg complains of political interference in the local DANY case, but Bragg does not operate outside of the political arena.”

“Jordan, in turn, has initiated a political response to what he and some of his constituents view as a manifest abuse of power and nakedly political prosecution, funded (in part) with federal money, that has the potential to interfere with the exercise of presidential duties and with an upcoming federal election,” Vyskocil wrote. “The Court does not endorse either side’s agenda.”

The subpoena to Pomerantz demands his appearance before the Judiciary Committee on Thursday. It is unclear if he will appear. A spokesperson for Bragg said Wednesday, “We respectfully disagree with the District Court’s decision and are seeking a stay pending appeal.”
 
Earl said:
The DA office took federal funds to prosecute Donald Trump, the DA office is interfering in a federal election, the DA office has openly stated their intentions are politically motivated, and therefore the DA office has no standing to try and avoid federal legislative scrutiny.

As Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil clarified to Bragg’s team, she has no standing to block a legislatively authorized congressional subpoena.

New York – […] “The sole question before the Court at this time is whether Bragg has a legal basis to quash a congressional subpoena that was issued with a valid legislative purpose. He does not,” Vyskocil wrote in her decision Wednesday.

Bragg, a Democrat, has accused Jordan of pursuing the subpoena to score political points while supporting Trump, a Republican. Vyskocil said the dispute appeared political, but said that did not impact her decision.

“In our federalist system, elected state and federal actors sometimes engage in political dogfights,” Vyskocil wrote in her order, noting that Bragg is an elected official. “Bragg complains of political interference in the local DANY case, but Bragg does not operate outside of the political arena.”

“Jordan, in turn, has initiated a political response to what he and some of his constituents view as a manifest abuse of power and nakedly political prosecution, funded (in part) with federal money, that has the potential to interfere with the exercise of presidential duties and with an upcoming federal election,” Vyskocil wrote. “The Court does not endorse either side’s agenda.”

The subpoena to Pomerantz demands his appearance before the Judiciary Committee on Thursday. It is unclear if he will appear. A spokesperson for Bragg said Wednesday, “We respectfully disagree with the District Court’s decision and are seeking a stay pending appeal.”
Click to expand...
Bragg may not be as smart as he thinks he is. :magagrin:
 
The reality is that the Judge didn’t take a stand either way, she didn’t agree with both sides, consequently letting Jordan’s subpoena stand. From here, Bragg will eventually appeal, postponing Jordan’s circus further

For Jordan, who himself refused subpoenas to testify, to expect anyone to cooperate with him is absurd
 
Why did Trump's band of thieves and liars get away with ignoring subpoenas and Congress asking for records? Bragg should tell them to pound sand.
 
Earl said:
Indeed.

He looks like he hasn't missed many meals.

His case should be thrown out for gross political misuse (abuse) of governmental powers.
Click to expand...
There may be a chance to charge him with abuse of his office.

Malfeasance

The defendant must be a public officer;
The defendant must have been exercising his power as a public officer;
The defendant is either exercising targeted malice or exceeding his powers.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top