Phantasmal Administrator Staff member Dec 3, 2015 #1 http://www.desmogblog.com/2015/12/0...luence-climate-denial-echo-chamber-first-time
C Celticguy New member Dec 3, 2015 #3 Perhapa they should focus on dealing with the pseudo science that plagues your cause.
Legion Troll A fine upstanding poster Dec 3, 2015 #4 Celticguy said: Perhapa they should focus on dealing with the pseudo science that plagues your cause. Click to expand... What "pseudo science" is that? I'll understand if you can't explain.
Celticguy said: Perhapa they should focus on dealing with the pseudo science that plagues your cause. Click to expand... What "pseudo science" is that? I'll understand if you can't explain.
Phantasmal Administrator Staff member Dec 3, 2015 #5 Celticguy said: Perhapa they should focus on dealing with the pseudo science that plagues your cause. Click to expand... Yeah, all those pseudo scientists that are conspiring together http://bravenewclimate.com/2008/08/31/so-just-who-does-climate-science/ There will be diverse opinions among this group – that is the nature of science – but provided their arguments are bound up in evidence and have survived rigorous pre-publication scrutiny and review, then they have to be considered a valid viewpoint (though not the final word – I’ll blog on ‘proof’ at some point). So, here is an incomplete list of what I consider to be the core scientific disciplines which have been primarily responsible for developing our current understanding of climate change and its implications. Atmospheric and Physical Sciences: Climatology, Meteorology, Atmospheric dynamics, Atmospheric physics, Atmospheric chemistry, Solar physics, Historical climatology Earth Sciences: Geophysics, Geochemistry, Geology, Soil Science, Oceanography, Glaciology, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoenvironmental reconstruction Biological Sciences: Ecology, Synthetic biology, Biochemistry, Global change biology, Biogeography, Ecophysiology, Ecological genetics Mathematics, Statistics and Computational analysis: Applied mathematics, Mathematical modelling, Computer science, Numerical modelling, Bayesian inference, Mathematical statistics, Time series analysis
Celticguy said: Perhapa they should focus on dealing with the pseudo science that plagues your cause. Click to expand... Yeah, all those pseudo scientists that are conspiring together http://bravenewclimate.com/2008/08/31/so-just-who-does-climate-science/ There will be diverse opinions among this group – that is the nature of science – but provided their arguments are bound up in evidence and have survived rigorous pre-publication scrutiny and review, then they have to be considered a valid viewpoint (though not the final word – I’ll blog on ‘proof’ at some point). So, here is an incomplete list of what I consider to be the core scientific disciplines which have been primarily responsible for developing our current understanding of climate change and its implications. Atmospheric and Physical Sciences: Climatology, Meteorology, Atmospheric dynamics, Atmospheric physics, Atmospheric chemistry, Solar physics, Historical climatology Earth Sciences: Geophysics, Geochemistry, Geology, Soil Science, Oceanography, Glaciology, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoenvironmental reconstruction Biological Sciences: Ecology, Synthetic biology, Biochemistry, Global change biology, Biogeography, Ecophysiology, Ecological genetics Mathematics, Statistics and Computational analysis: Applied mathematics, Mathematical modelling, Computer science, Numerical modelling, Bayesian inference, Mathematical statistics, Time series analysis
C canceled.2021.1 #AMERICAISDEAD Dec 3, 2015 #6 Gotta give the warmers credit. Who woulda thunk they could people to believe that CO2 is a pollutant Liberals are so gullible
Gotta give the warmers credit. Who woulda thunk they could people to believe that CO2 is a pollutant Liberals are so gullible