More proof that Fox is noise, not news!

Taichiliberal said:
And once again, we have a failure to meet a simple burden of proof by the right wing noise machine:


Sharyl Attkisson Keeps Peddling Hollow 'Liberal Media Bias' Claim
Former CBS Reporter Apparently Can't Produce Any Proof For Conspiracy


http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/04/17/sharyl-attkisson-keeps-peddling-hollow-liberal/198922
Click to expand...



Sharyl Attkisson DON'T have to prove 'Liberal Media Bias' where she worked,...SHE IS THE PROOF.....she IS the witness that proves the claim.
She was there.

Then, mediamatters goes really stupid saying,
"what scoops of hers didn't get on the air in 2013? And since leaving CBS, why hasn't the reporter rushed those alleged scoops out to the public?"

We're 4 months into 2014 and they want her to "rush" news scoops from last year out to the public?....NOW ?

...how fucking brainless is that idea, rush last years news scoops
to the public a year late......
I guess its just a brainless as the fool that reads 'mediamatters' and thinks what they have to say about anything really 'matters'.....


Incedently....how the fuck does this have any bearing on FOX news.....they just reported the story and thats the job of news programs...to report the news....

TCLibby proves hes just the village idiot again
 
Last edited:
Celticguy said:
She came from CBS ? There's your problem. Remember Gunga Dan's word processed evidence from the TANG ?
Click to expand...

And when all was said and done, he got screwed for a COPY of a document. No one ever proved that the information was incorrect...in fact, you had testimony from people that were involved that it wasn't.

And again, how does this change the FACT that Fox is giving this woman voice WITHOUT ANY requirement of proof?

What's good for the goose, as they say.....
 
NOVA said:
Sharyl Attkisson DON'T have to prove 'Liberal Media Bias' where she worked,...SHE IS THE PROOF.....she IS the witness that proves the claim.
She was there.

Then, mediamatters goes really stupid saying,
"what scoops of hers didn't get on the air in 2013? And since leaving CBS, why hasn't the reporter rushed those alleged scoops out to the public?"

We're 4 months into 2014 and they want her to "rush" news scoops from last year out to the public?....NOW ?

...how fucking brainless is that idea, rush last years news scoops
to the public a year late......
I guess its just a brainless as the fool that reads 'mediamatters' and thinks what they have to say about anything really 'matters'.....


Incedently....how the fuck does this have any bearing on FOX news.....they just reported the story and thats the job of news programs...to report the news....

TCLibby proves hes just the village idiot again
Click to expand...


:palm: Nova consistently proves to be the most blatantly stupid neocon/teabagger on these boards. In Nova's world, all one has to do is just make an accusation, and it's gospel truth! Joe McCarthy would have been proud!

And the topper is NOVA stating that Fox is NOT responsible for the claims of it's employees on the air waves! Or that harping on claims about a year old accusation is irrelevent! Really? This is the same Nova who wails like a banshee about "liberal media" bias and is consistently calling folks liars because he has PROOF from some right wing source....and STILL will regurgitate EVERY right wingnut mantra from the Bush era and the 2008 campaign! Well, all Media Matters is pointing out is that NO PROOF has been offered to back up Attkisson's claims.

Somebody pull Nova aside and explain the concept of verification in journalism. Then give the dumb bastard a drink and send him home.
 
Taichiliberal said:
:palm: Nova consistently proves to be the most blatantly stupid neocon/teabagger on these boards. In Nova's world, all one has to do is just make an accusation, and it's gospel truth! Joe McCarthy would have been proud!

And the topper is NOVA stating that Fox is NOT responsible for the claims of it's employees on the air waves! Or that harping on claims about a year old accusation is irrelevent! Really? This is the same Nova who wails like a banshee about "liberal media" bias and is consistently calling folks liars because he has PROOF from some right wing source....and STILL will regurgitate EVERY right wingnut mantra from the Bush era and the 2008 campaign! Well, all Media Matters is pointing out is that NO PROOF has been offered to back up Attkisson's claims.

Somebody pull Nova aside and explain the concept of verification in journalism. Then give the dumb bastard a drink and send him home.
Click to expand...


the accusation about MSNBC being a liberal Democrat propaganda network has been made thousands of times over the last decade.....Attkisson is the proof that
the claim is right on the mark....she was there...she worked for them......she has first hand knowledge.....SHE IS THE PROOF, insider testimony that confirms the
accusation.

Just as we all know that mediamatters is a left wing propaganda site...Fox News is FAIR AND BALANCED, and you're an idiot....
 
NOVA said:
the accusation about MSNBC being a liberal Democrat propaganda network has been made thousands of times over the last decade.....Attkisson is the proof that
the claim is right on the mark....she was there...she worked for them......she has first hand knowledge.....SHE IS THE PROOF, insider testimony that confirms the
accusation.

Just as we all know that mediamatters is a left wing propaganda site...Fox News is FAIR AND BALANCED, and you're an idiot....
Click to expand...

oh, Vanilla, you have been shown article after article that Fox News is not Fair and Balanced, so that makes you an idiot by your own standard.
 
NOVA said:
the accusation about MSNBC being a liberal Democrat propaganda network has been made thousands of times over the last decade.....Attkisson is the proof that
the claim is right on the mark....she was there...she worked for them......she has first hand knowledge.....SHE IS THE PROOF, insider testimony that confirms the
accusation.

Just as we all know that mediamatters is a left wing propaganda site...Fox News is FAIR AND BALANCED, and you're an idiot....
Click to expand...

Again, in Nova's world all Attkisson has to do is just say it's so, and voila'!...it is.

But yet, in Nova's world a different standard was placed upon Dan Rather at CBS.

Like I said, somebody give the dumb bastard a beer (or take it away from him) and explain that VALID DOCUMENTATION is needed to substantiate a claim in the world or real journalism...something Fox Noise constantly forgoes.

Nova is some damned stupid, he'll just repeat his idiocy and treat it as proof of itself. No sense in banging my head against that mental brick wall! :)
 
Taichiliberal said:
Again, in Nova's world all Attkisson has to do is just say it's so, and voila'!...it is.

But yet, in Nova's world a different standard was placed upon Dan Rather at CBS.

Like I said, somebody give the dumb bastard a beer (or take it away from him) and explain that VALID DOCUMENTATION is needed to substantiate a claim in the world or real journalism...something Fox Noise constantly forgoes.

Nova is some damned stupid, he'll just repeat his idiocy and treat it as proof of itself. No sense in banging my head against that mental brick wall! :)
Click to expand...

Oh yeah. I agree with you. Fox News are the bastards that told us we could keep our insurance and our doctor. Yup. I agree.
 
Taichiliberal said:
And once again, we have a failure to meet a simple burden of proof by the right wing noise machine:


Sharyl Attkisson Keeps Peddling Hollow 'Liberal Media Bias' Claim
Former CBS Reporter Apparently Can't Produce Any Proof For Conspiracy


http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/04/17/sharyl-attkisson-keeps-peddling-hollow-liberal/198922
Click to expand...

If you think the lamestream media, which has shed any hint of objectivity, is not biased or not all-in for Obama and BIG Liberal Government, you just might be a gullible low information twit stuck on stupid.
 
Taichiliberal said:
And when all was said and done, he got screwed for a COPY of a document. No one ever proved that the information was incorrect...in fact, you had testimony from people that were involved that it wasn't.

And again, how does this change the FACT that Fox is giving this woman voice WITHOUT ANY requirement of proof?

What's good for the goose, as they say.....
Click to expand...

LMAO; interpretation: baaahhhhh, baaaahhhh, baaaahhhhh.
 
Taichiliberal said:
:palm: Nova consistently proves to be the most blatantly stupid neocon/teabagger on these boards. In Nova's world, all one has to do is just make an accusation, and it's gospel truth! Joe McCarthy would have been proud!

And the topper is NOVA stating that Fox is NOT responsible for the claims of it's employees on the air waves! Or that harping on claims about a year old accusation is irrelevent! Really? This is the same Nova who wails like a banshee about "liberal media" bias and is consistently calling folks liars because he has PROOF from some right wing source....and STILL will regurgitate EVERY right wingnut mantra from the Bush era and the 2008 campaign! Well, all Media Matters is pointing out is that NO PROOF has been offered to back up Attkisson's claims.

Somebody pull Nova aside and explain the concept of verification in journalism. Then give the dumb bastard a drink and send him home.
Click to expand...

LMAO; ths from the gullible leftist twit bleating like a brain dead sheep for more leftist pabulum.

You dimwits can't help yourselves. Have some more kool-aid fool!
 
Truth Detector said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Nova consistently proves to be the most blatantly stupid neocon/teabagger on these boards. In Nova's world, all one has to do is just make an accusation, and it's gospel truth! Joe McCarthy would have been proud!

And the topper is NOVA stating that Fox is NOT responsible for the claims of it's employees on the air waves! Or that harping on claims about a year old accusation is irrelevent! Really? This is the same Nova who wails like a banshee about "liberal media" bias and is consistently calling folks liars because he has PROOF from some right wing source....and STILL will regurgitate EVERY right wingnut mantra from the Bush era and the 2008 campaign! Well, all Media Matters is pointing out is that NO PROOF has been offered to back up Attkisson's claims.

Somebody pull Nova aside and explain the concept of verification in journalism. Then give the dumb bastard a drink and send him home.
Click to expand...



LMAO; ths from the gullible leftist twit bleating like a brain dead sheep for more leftist pabulum.

You dimwits can't help yourselves. Have some more kool-aid fool!
Click to expand...

Ahhh, Tweedle Dumb has arrived!

Maybe you have the cojones to answer a simple question, my bogus Truth Detector.......Can one accept Attkisson's claims as gospel truth while ignoring the very cornerstone of journalism, which is SUPPLYING VALID, CORROBORATED EVIDENCE to support that claim?

And if so, is that not FAITH instead of FACT BASED TRUTH?

So put your ass back on and start thinking, TD. I'll wait.
 
Uncle Charley said:
Oh yeah. I agree with you. Fox News are the bastards that told us we could keep our insurance and our doctor. Yup. I agree.
Click to expand...

Not quite, chuckles. Obama owned up to that one....and it STILL wasn't as dire as Fox Noise would have you believe:


Claim: You won’t be able to choose your own doctor.
Claim: The government will be between you and your doctor.

FactCheck.org says: False.

These claims are variations on the fear that the government will be taking over health care — choosing your doctor, telling him or her what treatment to administer, etc. But the law doesn’t create a government-run system, as we’ve said many times. It actually greatly expands business for private insurance, by about 12 million new customers, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates. And individuals will choose their own doctors, just as they do now.

These type of fear-mongering claims appear to have quieted a bit in 2013 — along with the more extreme death-panel-type hysteria — but they’re still percolating. A TV ad this summer from the conservative Americans for Prosperity featured a mom named Julie, gently asking, “If we can’t pick our own doctor, how do I know my family’s going to get the care they need?” And: “Can I really trust the folks in Washington with my family’s health care?”

docpatientIt turns out, Julie doesn’t really mean that she might not be able to select her doctor herself. Part of the group’s support for the claim is the small net decline, as estimated by the CBO, in those who get insurance through their employer, a drop of 7 million people by 2018. (A total of 158 million are expected to have employer-sponsored coverage that year.) The CBO has said that those losing coverage would mainly be low-wage workers who could get subsidies to buy insurance on the exchanges. And, certainly, there’s a chance the doctor a worker had been seeing won’t be in the network of providers on a new plan. Some exchange policies could keep prices low by limiting those networks. But no one will choose policyholders’ doctors for them. They simply won’t be guaranteed that a new plan would have the same network of doctors, just as there’s no guarantee of that now (more on this in a minute).

As for the government-coming-between-you-and-your-doctor claim, the law’s regulatory provisions are more like putting the government between you and your insurance company — and in a way that brings added benefits to consumers. The law says insurers can’t have caps on coverage, turn down customers based on preexisting conditions (or charge them more), and can’t spend more than 15 percent or 20 percent on non-medical-related costs (see Obama’s rebate claim above).

Republicans also have attacked the Independent Payment Advisory Board as some kind of rationing board. But the IPAB — which is made up of medical professionals, health care experts, economists and consumer representatives — is charged with slowing the rate of growth of Medicare spending, and limited in how it can go about doing that. The law says the board’s proposals “shall not include any recommendation to ration health care, raise revenues or Medicare beneficiary premiums … increase Medicare beneficiary cost sharing (including deductibles, coinsurance, and co-payments), or otherwise restrict benefits or modify eligibility criteria.”

“False Assumptions on the Health Care Law,” July 11

“Romney, Obama Uphold Health Care Falsehoods,” June 28, 2012

“Romney’s ‘Gross’ Exaggeration on ‘Obamacare,’ “May 10, 2012



Claim: If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.

FactCheck.org: Misleading.

Obama has repeatedly made this claim, and the White House continues to use the line on its website. The law doesn’t force Americans to pick new plans or new doctors, but the president simply can’t make this promise to everyone. There’s no guarantee that your employer won’t switch plans, just as companies could have done before the law. And if you switch jobs, your new work-based coverage might not have your doctor as an in-network provider, either.

As we mentioned above, some employees won’t have an offer of insurance and will look for a new plan on the exchanges. Some small businesses could drop their current plans and join the exchanges, too. Grocery store chain Trader Joe’s, for instance, announced that it will direct its part-time workers (less than 30 hours per week) to the exchanges for health coverage and provide them with $500 to help purchase it, as of Jan. 1, 2014. The company, which has provided coverage to such workers, said “many crew members should be able to obtain health care coverage at very little, if any, net cost.”

“Romney, Obama Uphold Health Care Falsehoods,” June 28, 2012


So again, are we to just take Attkisson at her word? And if we do, is that bridge in Brooklyn still for sale? :awesome:
 
Truth Detector said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
And once again, we have a failure to meet a simple burden of proof by the right wing noise machine:


Sharyl Attkisson Keeps Peddling Hollow 'Liberal Media Bias' Claim
Former CBS Reporter Apparently Can't Produce Any Proof For Conspiracy


http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/04...liberal/198922
Click to expand...


If you think the lamestream media, which has shed any hint of objectivity, is not biased or not all-in for Obama and BIG Liberal Government, you just might be a gullible low information twit stuck on stupid.
Click to expand...


Spare me that tired old Rove mantra, toodles. Just grow a pair and answer this: Are we to just take Attkisson at her word? And if so, how is that adequate journalism from Fox?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top