Missing from Trump’s list of charitable giving: His own personal cash

christiefan915

Catalyst
Just another dishonest lying cheapskate who can still fool the dopes into thinking he's different from the usual politicians. How soon until someone responds " but-but-but CLINTON Foundation!" :D

Since the first day of his presidential campaign, Donald Trump has said that he gave more than $102 million to charity in the past five years. To back up that claim, Trump’s campaign compiled a list of his contributions — 4,844 of them, filling 93 pages. But, in that massive list, one thing was missing. Not a single one of those donations was actually a personal gift of Trump’s own money.

Instead, according to a Washington Post analysis, many of the gifts that Trump cited to prove his generosity were free rounds of golf, given away by his courses for charity auctions and raffles.

The largest items on the list were not cash gifts but land-conservation agreements to forgo development rights on property Trump owns. Trump’s campaign also counted a parcel of land that he’d given to New York state — although that was in 2006, not within the past five years.

In addition, many of the gifts on the list came from the charity that bears his name, the Donald J. Trump Foundation, which didn’t receive a personal check from Trump from 2009 through 2014, according to the most recent public tax filings. Its work is largely funded by others, although Trump decides where the gifts go. Some beneficiaries on the list are not charities at all: They included clients, other businesses and tennis superstar Serena Williams.

This list produced by Trump’s campaign — which has not been reported in detail before — provides an unusually broad portrait of Trump’s giving, and his approach to philanthropy in general.

It reveals how Trump has demonstrated less of the soaring, world-changing ambitions in his philanthropy than many other billionaires. Instead, his giving appears narrowly tied to his business and, now, his political interests. His foundation, for example, frequently gave money to groups that paid to use Trump’s facilities, and it donated to conservatives who could help promote Trump’s rise in the Republican Party. The foundation’s second-biggest donation described on the campaign’s list went to the charity of a man who had settled a lawsuit with one of Trump’s golf courses after being denied a hole-in-one prize.

The tally of Trump’s giving was provided by Trump’s campaign last year to the Associated Press, which was attempting to assess Trump’s recent record of charitable giving. The AP, which did not publish the list, provided it to The Post. When asked about The Post’s analysis, a top Trump aide acknowledged that none of the gifts had come in cash from the billionaire himself. But, he said, that was because the list was not a complete account of Trump’s gifts.

The aide, Allen Weisselberg, chief financial officer of the Trump Organization, said Trump had, in fact, given generously from his own pocket. But Weisselberg declined to provide any documentation, such as saying how much charitable giving Trump has declared in his federal tax filings.

(Continued)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...0-11e5-9140-e61d062438bb_story.html?tid=sm_tw
 
Just another dishonest lying cheapskate who can still fool the dopes into thinking he's different from the usual politicians. How soon until someone responds " but-but-but CLINTON Foundation!" :D

Since the first day of his presidential campaign, Donald Trump has said that he gave more than $102 million to charity in the past five years. To back up that claim, Trump’s campaign compiled a list of his contributions — 4,844 of them, filling 93 pages. But, in that massive list, one thing was missing. Not a single one of those donations was actually a personal gift of Trump’s own money.

Instead, according to a Washington Post analysis, many of the gifts that Trump cited to prove his generosity were free rounds of golf, given away by his courses for charity auctions and raffles.

The largest items on the list were not cash gifts but land-conservation agreements to forgo development rights on property Trump owns. Trump’s campaign also counted a parcel of land that he’d given to New York state — although that was in 2006, not within the past five years.

In addition, many of the gifts on the list came from the charity that bears his name, the Donald J. Trump Foundation, which didn’t receive a personal check from Trump from 2009 through 2014, according to the most recent public tax filings. Its work is largely funded by others, although Trump decides where the gifts go. Some beneficiaries on the list are not charities at all: They included clients, other businesses and tennis superstar Serena Williams.

This list produced by Trump’s campaign — which has not been reported in detail before — provides an unusually broad portrait of Trump’s giving, and his approach to philanthropy in general.

It reveals how Trump has demonstrated less of the soaring, world-changing ambitions in his philanthropy than many other billionaires. Instead, his giving appears narrowly tied to his business and, now, his political interests. His foundation, for example, frequently gave money to groups that paid to use Trump’s facilities, and it donated to conservatives who could help promote Trump’s rise in the Republican Party. The foundation’s second-biggest donation described on the campaign’s list went to the charity of a man who had settled a lawsuit with one of Trump’s golf courses after being denied a hole-in-one prize.

The tally of Trump’s giving was provided by Trump’s campaign last year to the Associated Press, which was attempting to assess Trump’s recent record of charitable giving. The AP, which did not publish the list, provided it to The Post. When asked about The Post’s analysis, a top Trump aide acknowledged that none of the gifts had come in cash from the billionaire himself. But, he said, that was because the list was not a complete account of Trump’s gifts.

The aide, Allen Weisselberg, chief financial officer of the Trump Organization, said Trump had, in fact, given generously from his own pocket. But Weisselberg declined to provide any documentation, such as saying how much charitable giving Trump has declared in his federal tax filings.

(Continued)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...0-11e5-9140-e61d062438bb_story.html?tid=sm_tw

So you're not giving to charity unless you give CASH ?.....thats an interesting take on what constitutes charity....totally wrong, but interesting.

At least he wasn't claiming giving his underwear to charity on his tax return like Clinton, huh.....
 
So you're not giving to charity unless you give CASH ?.....thats an interesting take on what constitutes charity....totally wrong, but interesting.

At least he wasn't claiming giving his underwear to charity on his tax return like Clinton, huh.....

Lol, what a hack you are. How is giving away a free round of golf charity?
 
Lol, what a hack you are. How is giving away a free round of golf charity?

Really? Guess you've never personally filled out a tax form have you.....or read the instructions for that matter.....

when Mr. Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas and his wife was a partner in a Little Rock law firm, the Clintons had gone so far as to deduct $2 for underwear donated to charities. You did realize that donating your underwear was considered charity didn't you.....used underwear, at that.....

Well donating services from a business you own is considered charitable giving also....does that explain it for you ?

businesses do it all time.....is this something you really weren't aware of...
 
Really? Guess you've never personally filled out a tax form have you.....or read the instructions for that matter.....

when Mr. Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas and his wife was a partner in a Little Rock law firm, the Clintons had gone so far as to deduct $2 for underwear donated to charities. You did realize that donating your underwear was considered charity didn't you.....used underwear, at that.....

Well donating services from a business you own is considered charitable giving also....does that explain it for you ?

businesses do it all time.....is this something you really weren't aware of...
That's not the point, pinhead.
 
Really? Guess you've never personally filled out a tax form have you.....or read the instructions for that matter.....

when Mr. Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas and his wife was a partner in a Little Rock law firm, the Clintons had gone so far as to deduct $2 for underwear donated to charities. You did realize that donating your underwear was considered charity didn't you.....

Well donating services from a business you own is considered charitable giving also....does that explain it for you ?

Sorry bravs, I personally file my own taxes all the time.

You're making fun of Clinton but clothing is a legitimate donation. Personally I'd never donate or buy undies at Goodwill but poor people don't have a lot of options.

I'm betting plenty of other pols have done the same but wouldn't itemize it after seeing the ridicule Clinton got for it.
 
Exactly. How did a free round of golf take money out of his pocket? It's a business write-off.


The same way a bakery donates a cake or a car dealer donates a car to some organization
or you donate clothes to the Salvation Army, even if you own the clothing store.....its charity, not a business loss


You're playin' with me, right....you can't be that ignorant.....
 
Last edited:
It's not like his own money went to charity.

He wasn't making money with free rounds of golf. So yes, it was money he could have earned but didn't. And it probably raises more money that way.

This guy is a bozo, but to bash him for this is absurd.

I noticed you wussed out on your Ray Lewis thread and banned me. You don't like anyone who proves you wrong.
 
Still, he always points out that he didn't personally didn't go bankrupt, well, he, personally, didn't give any money to charity.

You guys are really desperate here. These kind of lame attacks only make the doofus look better. This is birtherism level dumb.
 
That's not the point, pinhead.

Yes, it IS the point....she asked How is giving away a free round of golf charity, and I explained it to her....

Are you an idiot that can't follow the posts ?

Never mind....I know that answer....
 
He wasn't making money with free rounds of golf. So yes, it was money he could have earned but didn't. And it probably raises more money that way.

This guy is a bozo, but to bash him for this is absurd.

I noticed you wussed out on your Ray Lewis thread and banned me. You don't like anyone who proves you wrong.


You're getting a taste of the real left wing hacks.....just go with it and enjoy....

You guys are really desperate here. These kind of lame attacks only make the doofus look better. This is birtherism level dumb.

Birtherism level dumb ?......Good line, and right on the mark....
 
Back
Top