Marco Rubio's Illegal Presidential Campaign

christiefan915

christiefan915

Catalyst
Remember when righties claimed Hillary was using Clinton foundation money to fund her campaign? You guys be sure to apply that same standard to Rubio, now. :D

"Marco Rubio's presidential campaign is breaking the law with impunity and in so doing, is throwing up the specter of political corruption and the appearance of political corruption.

All of the money for Rubio's campaign ads to date has been illegally laundered through a non-profit organization that doesn't have to disclose its donors and is legally required to spend its funds for social welfare, not for the exclusive benefit of an individual such as a presidential candidate like Rubio...

How is Rubio's presidential campaign illegal?...

...many donors don't want the public to know how much they're giving to support a candidate, and many candidates, like Rubio, don't want voters to know how much money they're getting from millionaires, billionaires, and corporations who may be seeking political favors in return for financial support. So in addition to Super PACs, big donors launder campaign contributions through "social welfare" organizations which, in exchange for non-profit status and donor secrecy, are legally required to use the funds for social welfare and not for the exclusive benefit of an individual such as a political candidate...

...In short, funneling secret money to support a candidate through a so-called "social welfare" organization is illegal. Abuse of the "social welfare" loophole is increasingly common among political candidates and their wealthy financial backers. But the biggest known law-breaking to date surrounds the Rubio ads. And if the group running them gets away with it, such law-breaking will become the norm for politicians and their big money contributors.

100 percent of the $5.5 million in political ads supporting Rubio's presidential bid aired so far this year have been paid for by a non-profit "social welfare" group called Conservative Solutions Project which does not disclose its donors (who have contributed a total of $18 million so far). Not one dime of Rubio's political ads have been paid for by the Rubio campaign itself, or even Rubio's Super PAC which identifies its donors...

...Rubio's campaign ads to date are blatantly and shamelessly illegal and corrupt. But those who are running the ads are playing legal roulette, betting that the IRS is too intimidated to enforce the law, or even if it does, by then the campaign will be over and Rubio may be president with the ability to shut down any investigation.

(Continued)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles...pres_b_8518884.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592
 
Prior to the release of the New York Times bestselling investigative exposé Clinton Cash by Government Accountability Institute President and Breitbart Senior Editor-at-Large Peter Schweizer, Hillary Clinton and her supporters claimed she was among the most vetted political figures in America—a candidate about whom everything was known.

Yet as media outlets across the ideological spectrum have confirmed and verified the book’s explosive revelations about Clinton’s tenure as Sec. of State and the influx of hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign sources into the Clinton Foundation, the nation has learned much it did not know. Subsequent reporting by national news outlets has expanded on the book’s findings using its investigative methodology.

Indeed, the dizzying flurry of resulting Hillary Clinton Foundation scandals has been difficult to keep up with. As CNN’s John King put it on Sunday, “You can’t go 20 minutes in this town, it seems, without some sort of a story about Clinton Foundation that gives you a little bit of the creeps.”

Early on, as Clinton Cash bombshells began appearing in the New York Times, Washington Post, New Yorker, Bloomberg, and elsewhere, Hillary Clinton’s campaign sought to calm nervous campaign donors by announcing the creation of a special “rapid response” War Room aimed at combating a book, an unprecedented move in the annals of modern presidential campaigning. The Clinton campaign team built a website called “The Briefing,” issued memos, and tasked an eight-person team to create videos featuring embattled Clinton spokesperson Brian Fallon as he awkwardly and unsuccessfully attempted to smear Peter Schweizer. Team Clinton’s message: all of Clinton Cash’s revelations are incorrect or merely “coincidences.”

Yet as the nation’s largest news organizations began to confirm finding after finding, the Clinton campaign did the only thing it could: it gave up in its attempts to refute the swelling avalanche of now well-established facts. Indeed, the Clinton campaign’s last video response on its “The Briefing” YouTube page is dated May 5th—Clinton Cash’s official launch date.

To date, Hillary Clinton has yet to substantively answer a single question from the mountain of Clinton Cash questions that continue to pile up with each passing day.
http://is.gd/zKbVHQ
 
Lol, so I guess Hillary and Rubio won't be attacking each other on this matter if they are the chosen ones.
 
christiefan915 said:
Remember when righties claimed Hillary was using Clinton foundation money to fund her campaign? You guys be sure to apply that same standard to Rubio, now. :D

"Marco Rubio's presidential campaign is breaking the law with impunity and in so doing, is throwing up the specter of political corruption and the appearance of political corruption.

All of the money for Rubio's campaign ads to date has been illegally laundered through a non-profit organization that doesn't have to disclose its donors and is legally required to spend its funds for social welfare, not for the exclusive benefit of an individual such as a presidential candidate like Rubio...

How is Rubio's presidential campaign illegal?...

...many donors don't want the public to know how much they're giving to support a candidate, and many candidates, like Rubio, don't want voters to know how much money they're getting from millionaires, billionaires, and corporations who may be seeking political favors in return for financial support. So in addition to Super PACs, big donors launder campaign contributions through "social welfare" organizations which, in exchange for non-profit status and donor secrecy, are legally required to use the funds for social welfare and not for the exclusive benefit of an individual such as a political candidate...

...In short, funneling secret money to support a candidate through a so-called "social welfare" organization is illegal. Abuse of the "social welfare" loophole is increasingly common among political candidates and their wealthy financial backers. But the biggest known law-breaking to date surrounds the Rubio ads. And if the group running them gets away with it, such law-breaking will become the norm for politicians and their big money contributors.

100 percent of the $5.5 million in political ads supporting Rubio's presidential bid aired so far this year have been paid for by a non-profit "social welfare" group called Conservative Solutions Project which does not disclose its donors (who have contributed a total of $18 million so far). Not one dime of Rubio's political ads have been paid for by the Rubio campaign itself, or even Rubio's Super PAC which identifies its donors...

...Rubio's campaign ads to date are blatantly and shamelessly illegal and corrupt. But those who are running the ads are playing legal roulette, betting that the IRS is too intimidated to enforce the law, or even if it does, by then the campaign will be over and Rubio may be president with the ability to shut down any investigation.

(Continued)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles...pres_b_8518884.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592
Click to expand...

Fine by me. I don't support Rubio. You go KKKhristiefan
 
NOVA said:
Prior to the release of the New York Times bestselling investigative exposé Clinton Cash by Government Accountability Institute President and Breitbart Senior Editor-at-Large Peter Schweizer, Hillary Clinton and her supporters claimed she was among the most vetted political figures in America—a candidate about whom everything was known.

Yet as media outlets across the ideological spectrum have confirmed and verified the book’s explosive revelations about Clinton’s tenure as Sec. of State and the influx of hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign sources into the Clinton Foundation, the nation has learned much it did not know. Subsequent reporting by national news outlets has expanded on the book’s findings using its investigative methodology.

Indeed, the dizzying flurry of resulting Hillary Clinton Foundation scandals has been difficult to keep up with. As CNN’s John King put it on Sunday, “You can’t go 20 minutes in this town, it seems, without some sort of a story about Clinton Foundation that gives you a little bit of the creeps.”

Early on, as Clinton Cash bombshells began appearing in the New York Times, Washington Post, New Yorker, Bloomberg, and elsewhere, Hillary Clinton’s campaign sought to calm nervous campaign donors by announcing the creation of a special “rapid response” War Room aimed at combating a book, an unprecedented move in the annals of modern presidential campaigning. The Clinton campaign team built a website called “The Briefing,” issued memos, and tasked an eight-person team to create videos featuring embattled Clinton spokesperson Brian Fallon as he awkwardly and unsuccessfully attempted to smear Peter Schweizer. Team Clinton’s message: all of Clinton Cash’s revelations are incorrect or merely “coincidences.”

Yet as the nation’s largest news organizations began to confirm finding after finding, the Clinton campaign did the only thing it could: it gave up in its attempts to refute the swelling avalanche of now well-established facts. Indeed, the Clinton campaign’s last video response on its “The Briefing” YouTube page is dated May 5th—Clinton Cash’s official launch date.

To date, Hillary Clinton has yet to substantively answer a single question from the mountain of Clinton Cash questions that continue to pile up with each passing day.
http://is.gd/zKbVHQ
Click to expand...

PS

Who claimed Clinton Foundation money was funding her campaign? I guess you think you can pull wild accusations out of your ass now that almost two years of threads are gone so you have a convenient excuse for not being able to back up your lies

Nobody accused the bitch of that. The accusation was that people made donations to the Clinton slush fund as a way to curry favor with a sitting Secretary of State.

Remember when KKKhristiefan said that Bernie Sanders would drop out of the race by November?
 
I Love America said:
PS

Who claimed Clinton Foundation money was funding her campaign? I guess you think you can pull wild accusations out of your ass now that almost two years of threads are gone so you have a convenient excuse for not being able to back up your lies

Nobody accused the bitch of that. The accusation was that people made donations to the Clinton slush fund as a way to curry favor with a sitting Secretary of State.

Remember when KKKhristiefan said that Bernie Sanders would drop out of the race by November?
Click to expand...

Righties on this forum claimed that Hillary was robbing the foundation to pay for her campaign. I guess you don't remember because you were up in your mountain retreat prepping for the Islamist invasion.
 
christiefan915 said:
Righties on this forum claimed that Hillary was robbing the foundation to pay for her campaign. I guess you don't remember because you were up in your mountain retreat prepping for the Islamist invasion.
Click to expand...

Who? Name names. I mean we have at most 20 "righties" surely you can call them out by name.

If you can't, I understand.

As for my prepping, I am fully prepared. I find it funny that people scoff at the notion of being prepared for unforeseen events. I suspect you are not prepared for much so your derision comes from a place of insecurity.

But name names
 
LOL

Let me know when the DOJ does a complete and thorough investigation of Hillary's non profit, as well as a list of all the donor's. I won't hold my breath, because it will never happen.
 
evince said:
why has the republican party not fixed this mess in congress?



because they like the mess
Click to expand...

When Obama was elected, democrats were in control of both houses, why did they not do it then??? Because it would expose them for what they are. CROOKS.
 
christiefan915 said:
Righties on this forum claimed that Hillary was robbing the foundation to pay for her campaign.
Click to expand...

I recall saying that she was robbing the foundation to pay for her lavish lifestyle......not for a minute would I expect her to use any of her own money to pay for her campaign.....that's what the Chinese are for.........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top