MAGA farm owners say they can’t find American workers anymore

鬼百合

One day we will wake to his obituary :-)



American farmers—many of whom backed Trump in 2024—are facing a perfect storm: ICE’s aggressive deportation efforts and erratic tariff moves are wreaking havoc on their livelihoods, threatening rural communities with economic collapse.

Immigration enforcement has disrupted a crucial labor force. A June 21 Washington Post report detailed how Colorado farmer J.J. Ficke—a Trump voter—lost access to a $200,000 federal grant to hire seasonal farmhands from Latin America. That grant, alongside billions in agricultural funding, was frozen in January 2025. Over 140 farmers applied, seeking $4 million, but none received any funds. Wisconsin grower Tracy Vinz lamented, “I’ve employed Americans, and they quit after a few days. They quit after a few hours.” Georgia’s Mitch Lawson echoed that sentiment, observing American workers often don’t last a full day. The USDA estimates 42% of crop farmworkers are undocumented—highlighting how heavily farming relies on immigrant labor.

In Vermont, dairy farmers are paralyzed with fear after ICE raids. One farmer noted, “All the dairy farmers who voted for Trump were under the impression they weren’t going to come on farms and take our guys.” Vermont’s $3.6 billion dairy industry supplies 63% of New England’s milk, prompting the state’s agriculture secretary to ask, “Who’s going to milk the cows?” Trump acknowledged the strain on June 12 via Truth Social: “Our great Farmers… have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace.” He promised “changes are coming,” and on June 20 posts on X suggested a farm-sponsored migrant worker program—though no policy changes have materialized.


On top of labor woes, Trump’s tariff blitz is compounding the crisis. On March 3 he announced 25% tariffs on agricultural imports from Canada and Mexico, to begin April 2, urging domestic production. But U.S. farm exports—worth $180 billion annually—are now threatened by retaliatory duties. In his first term, tariffs triggered a $23 billion bailout; current threats could demand even larger rescues. West Virginia’s Jennifer Gilkerson lamented to NBC News how USDA cutbacks left her unsold freeze-dried fruits. Iowa’s Bob Hemesath warned, “Once you lose those markets to other suppliers, it’s very hard to get them back.” Kansas consultant Ben Palen criticized farmers for trusting Trump blindly, noting tariffs push up costs for fertilizer, equipment, and fuel while critical programs like the 45Z tax credit hang in limbo.

North Carolina farmer Ethan Jordan still faces drought and flood losses, with $77,000 in pending USDA aid for 1,600 acres. Trump’s freeze affected the Environmental Quality Incentives and Rural Energy for America programs. Maryland flower farmer Laura Beth Resnick invested $73,000 in solar panels expecting reimbursement, only to face financial ruin. Although a judge blocked the freeze, funds remain stalled. Vegetable farmers Jacob and Jennifer Thomas took a 10% hit after $1 billion in school and food bank produce programs was slashed. California winemaker Bryan Zesiger described the cuts as “earth-shattering and life-changing.”

These combined pressures are shifting farmers’ allegiances. Wisconsin journalist John Nichols noted on MSNBC on May 23 that rural growers are in “real crisis” over trade uncertainty and tariffs. NPR’s Jim Moyer from Washington State warned damaged global trade ties—China’s potential switch to Brazil could bite—and merchandiser Byron Behne criticized Trump’s vague “have fun” messaging. The Atlantic reported on April 16 that American soybean producers in red states are losing ground; China’s retaliatory 125% tariffs risk diverting business permanently to Brazil, fueling environmental concerns about Amazon deforestation.

Farmers are proposing fixes: legal work pathways and targeted bailouts to match tariff losses. A Reddit user on June 21 wrote that farm laborers deserve documentation and living wages, estimating a $21/hour farm wage in Wisconsin would hike grocery prices by only 20% at most. Others are investing in automation—though high-tech pickers still can’t fully replace hands-on labor.


With midterms on the horizon, this economic strain could undercut Trump’s rural base. Ficke, suffering drought, costs, and Medicaid uncertainty, faces the choice of survival over politics. His wife Kassidee asked, “How would the couple, who had no health insurance, pay for their daughter’s care if the administration and Congress gutted Medicaid?” Meanwhile, Texas grower Travis Johnson told the Guardian on April 15, “No farmer wants this, but without a bailout, this could be devastating, and a lot more people could go under.”

Trump’s vague promise of “changes” offers little comfort. Farm communities that once trusted him now brace for impact. As these struggles intensify with no relief in sight, America’s food supply, rural economies, and political allegiances hang in the balance.
 

Wisconsin meatpackers face labour shortage after Trump orders migrants home (Financial Times)​


Wisconsin meatpackers face labour shortage after Trump orders migrants home

Lack of workers will restrict economic growth and could push up prices at grocery stores, economists warn

https://www.ft.com/content/f055fee3-87b0-4ca0-af5a-ea964a6c6d21

When Wisconsin’s Tyson Foods was struggling to find enough local workers to make its Ball Park brand hotdogs, it found relief some 2,000km away among Florida’s growing population of Haitian migrants.

Tyson employees said the roughly 100 Haitians who arrived in the rural city of New London helped the plant run “more smoothly than it had in years”. That all changed in June when US President Donald Trump ended the programme through which they received work permits.

Similar situations are playing out in food processing facilities around the country amid Trump’s immigration crackdown and the resulting cancellation of programmes allowing people to live and work in the US.

The sector has struggled to fill positions for its labour-intensive jobs after the president in June axed a Joe Biden-era initiative allowing some individuals fleeing political unrest to come to the US.

The programme, known as CHNV, permitted eligible Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans to work in the US for two years. Earlier in the year Trump halted temporary protected status for migrants from countries including Honduras and Nicaragua.

The meatpacking industry’s lobbying group, the Meat Institute, estimated that 10-20 per cent of the sector’s more than 510,000 workers may have been in the CHNV programme.

“Every meatpacking plant in the country has been affected by this at some level,” said Mark Lauritsen, the director of the division of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW).

JBS, the world’s largest meat processor, laid off more than 200 workers from its Ottumwa, Iowa pork processing plant this summer after their work permits were revoked, according to the city’s mayor. American Foods Group also dismissed about 80 Haitians from its Long Prairie, Minnesota beef plant, the UFCW said.

JBS, American Food Groups and Tyson did not respond to requests for comment.

A Meat Institute spokesperson said that although meat packers and processors advertise a “very aggressive” average hourly wage of $17, plus healthcare and tuition reimbursement, many plants “continue to face labour challenges” after losing those workers.

The shift in immigration policy under Trump has put pressure on the primary drivers of Wisconsin’s economy — agriculture, manufacturing and tourism. Employers were “sweating bullets”, said Steven Deller, a professor at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, who has studied the state’s labour market.

Wisconsin has had an acute labour shortage since 2017, and its businesses “desperately” need more workers, he said.

“It’s creating a bottleneck for the economy to grow,” Deller said. “If we had labour, we’d be growing much faster than we are.”

Meatpackers are lobbying to be included in an expanded “guest worker” programme for farms struggling to hire amid the administration’s efforts to deport undocumented immigrants. But so far they have been unsuccessful.

Economists warn that labour shortages will lead to higher prices at grocery stores. If a lack of workers force plants to slow production lines, it could reduce already tight supplies. Beef prices have surged to record highs this year, with the country’s cattle inventory falling to its lowest mid-year number in data going back to 1973.

 

MAGA farm owners say they can’t find American workers anymore​

Surprise, surprise, ... this article is from an anti-Trump rag with zero journalistic integrity. Below is Copilot's very kind summary:


It’s a politically charged news and commentary site, written in English, with a strong editorial slant that’s highly critical of Donald Trump and his allies.

🔍 What You’ll Find on SinhalaGuide.com

- Anti-Trump Focus: Nearly every headline centers around Trump’s health, alleged corruption, or controversial decisions. Examples include:
- “Trump has only 6–8 months to live”: a viral video fuels health rumors.
- “President of Portugal claims Trump is a clear Russian asset aiding Putin”.
- “JD Vance says he’s ready to lead if Trump’s health declines.”

- Satirical & Sensational Tone: Many articles use provocative language, emotional framing, and viral social media references. It’s not traditional journalism—it’s more like political commentary with a tabloid edge.

- Other Topics: Occasionally, the site veers into broader issues like LGBTQ+ rights, immigration, and tech (e.g., CRISPR research or Netflix’s political donations), but the Trump narrative dominates.

🧠 Editorial Style
The writing style is punchy, informal, and clearly aimed at readers who are skeptical of MAGA politics. It’s not neutral reporting—it’s advocacy journalism with a progressive slant.

If you’re curious about who runs the site or want help analyzing a specific article, I can dig deeper. Or if you’re wondering how it compares to other political media, I’ve got thoughts on that too.
 
Surprise, surprise, ... this article is from an anti-Trump rag with zero journalistic integrity. Below is Copilot's very kind summary:


It’s a politically charged news and commentary site, written in English, with a strong editorial slant that’s highly critical of Donald Trump and his allies.

🔍 What You’ll Find on SinhalaGuide.com

- Anti-Trump Focus: Nearly every headline centers around Trump’s health, alleged corruption, or controversial decisions. Examples include:
- “Trump has only 6–8 months to live”: a viral video fuels health rumors.
- “President of Portugal claims Trump is a clear Russian asset aiding Putin”.
- “JD Vance says he’s ready to lead if Trump’s health declines.”

- Satirical & Sensational Tone: Many articles use provocative language, emotional framing, and viral social media references. It’s not traditional journalism—it’s more like political commentary with a tabloid edge.

- Other Topics: Occasionally, the site veers into broader issues like LGBTQ+ rights, immigration, and tech (e.g., CRISPR research or Netflix’s political donations), but the Trump narrative dominates.

🧠 Editorial Style
The writing style is punchy, informal, and clearly aimed at readers who are skeptical of MAGA politics. It’s not neutral reporting—it’s advocacy journalism with a progressive slant.

If you’re curious about who runs the site or want help analyzing a specific article, I can dig deeper. Or if you’re wondering how it compares to other political media, I’ve got thoughts on that too.

Not only is IBDaMoron incapable of composing original views and opinions, he posts his AI crap in yellow text against a white field, making it more difficult to read.

Gotta wonder why.
 



American farmers—many of whom backed Trump in 2024—are facing a perfect storm: ICE’s aggressive deportation efforts and erratic tariff moves are wreaking havoc on their livelihoods, threatening rural communities with economic collapse.

Immigration enforcement has disrupted a crucial labor force. A June 21 Washington Post report detailed how Colorado farmer J.J. Ficke—a Trump voter—lost access to a $200,000 federal grant to hire seasonal farmhands from Latin America. That grant, alongside billions in agricultural funding, was frozen in January 2025. Over 140 farmers applied, seeking $4 million, but none received any funds. Wisconsin grower Tracy Vinz lamented, “I’ve employed Americans, and they quit after a few days. They quit after a few hours.” Georgia’s Mitch Lawson echoed that sentiment, observing American workers often don’t last a full day. The USDA estimates 42% of crop farmworkers are undocumented—highlighting how heavily farming relies on immigrant labor.

In Vermont, dairy farmers are paralyzed with fear after ICE raids. One farmer noted, “All the dairy farmers who voted for Trump were under the impression they weren’t going to come on farms and take our guys.” Vermont’s $3.6 billion dairy industry supplies 63% of New England’s milk, prompting the state’s agriculture secretary to ask, “Who’s going to milk the cows?” Trump acknowledged the strain on June 12 via Truth Social: “Our great Farmers… have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace.” He promised “changes are coming,” and on June 20 posts on X suggested a farm-sponsored migrant worker program—though no policy changes have materialized.


On top of labor woes, Trump’s tariff blitz is compounding the crisis. On March 3 he announced 25% tariffs on agricultural imports from Canada and Mexico, to begin April 2, urging domestic production. But U.S. farm exports—worth $180 billion annually—are now threatened by retaliatory duties. In his first term, tariffs triggered a $23 billion bailout; current threats could demand even larger rescues. West Virginia’s Jennifer Gilkerson lamented to NBC News how USDA cutbacks left her unsold freeze-dried fruits. Iowa’s Bob Hemesath warned, “Once you lose those markets to other suppliers, it’s very hard to get them back.” Kansas consultant Ben Palen criticized farmers for trusting Trump blindly, noting tariffs push up costs for fertilizer, equipment, and fuel while critical programs like the 45Z tax credit hang in limbo.

North Carolina farmer Ethan Jordan still faces drought and flood losses, with $77,000 in pending USDA aid for 1,600 acres. Trump’s freeze affected the Environmental Quality Incentives and Rural Energy for America programs. Maryland flower farmer Laura Beth Resnick invested $73,000 in solar panels expecting reimbursement, only to face financial ruin. Although a judge blocked the freeze, funds remain stalled. Vegetable farmers Jacob and Jennifer Thomas took a 10% hit after $1 billion in school and food bank produce programs was slashed. California winemaker Bryan Zesiger described the cuts as “earth-shattering and life-changing.”

These combined pressures are shifting farmers’ allegiances. Wisconsin journalist John Nichols noted on MSNBC on May 23 that rural growers are in “real crisis” over trade uncertainty and tariffs. NPR’s Jim Moyer from Washington State warned damaged global trade ties—China’s potential switch to Brazil could bite—and merchandiser Byron Behne criticized Trump’s vague “have fun” messaging. The Atlantic reported on April 16 that American soybean producers in red states are losing ground; China’s retaliatory 125% tariffs risk diverting business permanently to Brazil, fueling environmental concerns about Amazon deforestation.

Farmers are proposing fixes: legal work pathways and targeted bailouts to match tariff losses. A Reddit user on June 21 wrote that farm laborers deserve documentation and living wages, estimating a $21/hour farm wage in Wisconsin would hike grocery prices by only 20% at most. Others are investing in automation—though high-tech pickers still can’t fully replace hands-on labor.


With midterms on the horizon, this economic strain could undercut Trump’s rural base. Ficke, suffering drought, costs, and Medicaid uncertainty, faces the choice of survival over politics. His wife Kassidee asked, “How would the couple, who had no health insurance, pay for their daughter’s care if the administration and Congress gutted Medicaid?” Meanwhile, Texas grower Travis Johnson told the Guardian on April 15, “No farmer wants this, but without a bailout, this could be devastating, and a lot more people could go under.”

Trump’s vague promise of “changes” offers little comfort. Farm communities that once trusted him now brace for impact. As these struggles intensify with no relief in sight, America’s food supply, rural economies, and political allegiances hang in the balance.
Capitalism 101. Pay the cost of labor. Amazing people still do not comprehend such a simple concept.
 



American farmers—many of whom backed Trump in 2024—are facing a perfect storm: ICE’s aggressive deportation efforts and erratic tariff moves are wreaking havoc on their livelihoods, threatening rural communities with economic collapse.

Immigration enforcement has disrupted a crucial labor force. A June 21 Washington Post report detailed how Colorado farmer J.J. Ficke—a Trump voter—lost access to a $200,000 federal grant to hire seasonal farmhands from Latin America. That grant, alongside billions in agricultural funding, was frozen in January 2025. Over 140 farmers applied, seeking $4 million, but none received any funds. Wisconsin grower Tracy Vinz lamented, “I’ve employed Americans, and they quit after a few days. They quit after a few hours.” Georgia’s Mitch Lawson echoed that sentiment, observing American workers often don’t last a full day. The USDA estimates 42% of crop farmworkers are undocumented—highlighting how heavily farming relies on immigrant labor.

In Vermont, dairy farmers are paralyzed with fear after ICE raids. One farmer noted, “All the dairy farmers who voted for Trump were under the impression they weren’t going to come on farms and take our guys.” Vermont’s $3.6 billion dairy industry supplies 63% of New England’s milk, prompting the state’s agriculture secretary to ask, “Who’s going to milk the cows?” Trump acknowledged the strain on June 12 via Truth Social: “Our great Farmers… have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace.” He promised “changes are coming,” and on June 20 posts on X suggested a farm-sponsored migrant worker program—though no policy changes have materialized.


On top of labor woes, Trump’s tariff blitz is compounding the crisis. On March 3 he announced 25% tariffs on agricultural imports from Canada and Mexico, to begin April 2, urging domestic production. But U.S. farm exports—worth $180 billion annually—are now threatened by retaliatory duties. In his first term, tariffs triggered a $23 billion bailout; current threats could demand even larger rescues. West Virginia’s Jennifer Gilkerson lamented to NBC News how USDA cutbacks left her unsold freeze-dried fruits. Iowa’s Bob Hemesath warned, “Once you lose those markets to other suppliers, it’s very hard to get them back.” Kansas consultant Ben Palen criticized farmers for trusting Trump blindly, noting tariffs push up costs for fertilizer, equipment, and fuel while critical programs like the 45Z tax credit hang in limbo.

North Carolina farmer Ethan Jordan still faces drought and flood losses, with $77,000 in pending USDA aid for 1,600 acres. Trump’s freeze affected the Environmental Quality Incentives and Rural Energy for America programs. Maryland flower farmer Laura Beth Resnick invested $73,000 in solar panels expecting reimbursement, only to face financial ruin. Although a judge blocked the freeze, funds remain stalled. Vegetable farmers Jacob and Jennifer Thomas took a 10% hit after $1 billion in school and food bank produce programs was slashed. California winemaker Bryan Zesiger described the cuts as “earth-shattering and life-changing.”

These combined pressures are shifting farmers’ allegiances. Wisconsin journalist John Nichols noted on MSNBC on May 23 that rural growers are in “real crisis” over trade uncertainty and tariffs. NPR’s Jim Moyer from Washington State warned damaged global trade ties—China’s potential switch to Brazil could bite—and merchandiser Byron Behne criticized Trump’s vague “have fun” messaging. The Atlantic reported on April 16 that American soybean producers in red states are losing ground; China’s retaliatory 125% tariffs risk diverting business permanently to Brazil, fueling environmental concerns about Amazon deforestation.

Farmers are proposing fixes: legal work pathways and targeted bailouts to match tariff losses. A Reddit user on June 21 wrote that farm laborers deserve documentation and living wages, estimating a $21/hour farm wage in Wisconsin would hike grocery prices by only 20% at most. Others are investing in automation—though high-tech pickers still can’t fully replace hands-on labor.


With midterms on the horizon, this economic strain could undercut Trump’s rural base. Ficke, suffering drought, costs, and Medicaid uncertainty, faces the choice of survival over politics. His wife Kassidee asked, “How would the couple, who had no health insurance, pay for their daughter’s care if the administration and Congress gutted Medicaid?” Meanwhile, Texas grower Travis Johnson told the Guardian on April 15, “No farmer wants this, but without a bailout, this could be devastating, and a lot more people could go under.”

Trump’s vague promise of “changes” offers little comfort. Farm communities that once trusted him now brace for impact. As these struggles intensify with no relief in sight, America’s food supply, rural economies, and political allegiances hang in the balance.
Less than 4% of illegals work in agriculture. More makeup bullshit from the .lying left.
 
Less than 4% of illegals work in agriculture. More makeup bullshit from the .lying left.
Hilarious irony.

The made up right-wing bullshit king accusing the left of lying....

1000023536.jpg

Why do you 💩 piles even bother trying to sneak your 💩 past us anymore when you know we're too smart to buy it and it's so easy to debunk?
 
Back
Top