Lyin' Ted Cruz!

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Trump is not always wrong.... usually, but in the most recent characterization of Cruz he hit the nail on the head.



"Lyin' Ted, holds the Bible up high, then sets it down and starts telling lies."




I don't see how he could accept Raphael Edward as VP after admitting the truth about him.
 
ted-cruz-donald-trump.jpg


Can a Canadian serve as VP?
 
You going to start any threads about the candidate you supposedly support saying Hillary is not qualified to be President?
 
You going to start any threads about the candidate you supposedly support saying Hillary is not qualified to be President?

I think HRC is qualified, in fact I think she is the most qualified candidate we have had in modern times.
 
I think HRC is qualified, in fact I think she is the most qualified candidate we have had in modern times.

What qualifications does she possess?

Her accomplishments are almost nil, aren't they?

If she wasn't BJs' wife, chances are you would never heard of her.
 
What qualifications does she possess?

Her accomplishments are almost nil, aren't they?

If she wasn't BJs' wife, chances are you would never heard of her.

Are you being sarcastic? I hope we are not back to this again...
 
Several months ago I listed a huge amount of them, you can look for it, or I will likely have time later.

While she has many accomplishments, its not as much those accomplishments that speak to her qualifications to be president, it is her experiences that have given her the knowledge of the office of the Presidency that makes her unique as a candidate. She served as advisor and lead to many taskforces as first lady of Arkansas (not a typical first lady, but one involved in the project of governing), she has seen the job of Governor first hand. She served as advisor and as chair of the healthcare taskforce in her husband's presidency, She served in the Senate as a representative of New York during the Bush Administration, She served as Secretary of State in the Obama Administration.

Those experiences alone make her the most educated about the American Presidency as anyone I can think of. She has seen the job of Governor and President as few have. She has been a Senator and Secretary of State having given her an up close view of two more presidencies. She has a multitude of accomplishments that I have previously listed.

Now if you disagree with her policies, you might not vote for her, but her qualifications are self evidence to anyone who understands her history.
 
Last edited:
Several months ago I listed a huge amount of them, you can look for it, or I will likely have time later.

So you say.

If she has so few accomplishments in her public life that you can't name a single one without research, that's telling.
 
I find it to be very hypocritical of Donald Trump to call someone else a liar considering everything he says today is then contradicted by his own words tomorrow.
 
I really enjoy the illustration of how fast detractors refuse to discuss the topics of my threads and twist them into something like this.

It speaks volumes.
 
I find it to be very hypocritical of Donald Trump to call someone else a liar considering everything he says today is then contradicted by his own words tomorrow.

This is true, but Trumps hypocrisy does not change that fact that Lyin' Ted is a liar.
 
This is true, but Trumps hypocrisy does not change that fact that Lyin' Ted is a liar.

Ok but what examples does he give that shows Cruz is lying? He is basically calling him "lying Ted" as a jingle basically so that it sticks in peoples minds and convinces people that Cruz is a liar even though there are no examples. If you say something enough people will believe it.
 
I really enjoy the illustration of how fast detractors refuse to discuss the topics of my threads and twist them into something like this.

It speaks volumes.

What speaks volumes is the fact that you're a liberal who never discusses your own party's race while starting a thread on the Republicans everyday. And then you enlighten us with comments that Trump's not conservative and Hillary Clinton is, until you claim the opposite. This shtick is transparent.
 
What speaks volumes is the fact that you're a liberal who never discusses your own party's race while starting a thread on the Republicans everyday. And then you enlighten us with comments that Trump's not conservative and Hillary Clinton is, until you claim the opposite. This shtick is transparent.

If you say so. I understand HRC and Sanders and the Democratic Party. I also understand the stick against them by most Conservatives and am tired of it. I prefer to discuss what I cant understand which is support for the likes of Trump or Cruz. So far, few are willing to defend them or the Republican party and thus I am not enjoying this election season as much as I have enjoyed them in the past. Discussing the benefits and weaknesses of GWB, McCain and Romney was fun for me. I wish some would start trying to defend Cruz or Trump.

I do join in when others start threads about my party... I defend the candidates I like. I have spent hours explaining Benghazi and emails to people who lacked understanding and simply adopted the party narrative. Ill continue to do that. Even in this thread alone I have (once again) discussed HRC's qualifications to be president.

I think its you who is uncomfortable discussing the state of the "Conservative" candidates and Republican party. You are not alone, its like pulling teeth to get people to discuss it this election season. Damocles and most of the reasonable Conservatives have all but fully disappeared. You, Cawacko, are someone I consider a generally reasonable conservative, but you wont discuss the elephant in the room. Pun intended.
 
Ok but what examples does he give that shows Cruz is lying? He is basically calling him "lying Ted" as a jingle basically so that it sticks in peoples minds and convinces people that Cruz is a liar even though there are no examples. If you say something enough people will believe it.

The only examples Trump generally gives is what "Raphael" did to Carson in Iowa and how he has changed his stance on immigration.
 
Several months ago I listed a huge amount of them, you can look for it, or I will likely have time later.

While she has many accomplishments, its not as much those accomplishments that speak to her qualifications to be president, it is her experiences that have given her the knowledge of the office of the Presidency that makes her unique as a candidate. She served as advisor and lead to many taskforces as first lady of Arkansas (not a typical first lady, but one involved in the project of governing), she has seen the job of Governor first hand. She served as advisor and as chair of the healthcare taskforce in her husband's presidency, She served in the Senate as a representative of New York during the Bush Administration, She served as Secretary of State in the Obama Administration.

Those experiences alone make her the most educated about the American Presidency as anyone I can think of. She has seen the job of Governor and President as few have. She has been a Senator and Secretary of State having given her an up close view of two more presidencies. She has a multitude of accomplishments that I have previously listed.

Now if you disagree with her policies, you might not vote for her, but her qualifications are self evidence to anyone who understands her history.

Hastily threw something together after I shamed you into it, I see.

You provided a summary of her CV.

No one is denying she held all those positions, thanks to who she married.

What, if anything, did she accomplish in those positions?

Did she implement a national healthcare plan as First Lady?

Did she sponsor any important legislation and persuade her colleagues to pass it as a Senator?

Did she broker any deals as Secretary of State that can be viewed as successful?

What has she done, Counselor?
 
The only examples Trump generally gives is what "Raphael" did to Carson in Iowa and how he has changed his stance on immigration.

Ok but all Cruz did in Iowa was forward a CNN report. He didn't lie. As for immigration he has been pretty consistent but went a little tougher. If Cruz adjusting his stance on immigration counts as a lie then Trump is one massive liar considering all of the stances he's changed on since day 1 up until today. Wouldn't you agree?
 
Back
Top