LMAO!! 1 COPY OF Bolton manuscript sent to WH, NUMEROUS COPIES 'XEROXED' & it leaked

C

Centerleftfl

Verified User
LMAO!! 1 COPY OF Bolton manuscript sent to WH, NUMEROUS COPIES 'XEROXED' & it leaked

Go figure! :laugh::laugh: But, but, but the LIBERAL MEDIA leaked it. But, but, but DEMOCRATS in CONGRESS leaked it. On your mark get set go!

PS Can Bolton sue? I mean it's HIS intellectual property and it was 'stolen'. Trump is REALLY BIG on the stealing of intellectual property.

PSS The book doesn't come out till MAR, yesterday it was on AMAZON's top 10 LIST.

Bolton book leaked after the White House made copies of the single manuscript they were given: report


Published 6 hours ago on
January 27, 2020
By Bob Brigham

White-House-staff-in-the-Oval-Office.jpg


​
More details are emerging as to how The New York Times obtained a manuscript of John Bolton’s upcoming book The Room Where it Happened.
NBC News correspondent Carol Lee reported Monday that one copy of Bolton’s manuscript was given to the White House — where copies were made.
Bolton reportedly believes that “the process was corrupted” by the administration.

​
“So it suggests that there are multiple copies floating around, and from the Bolton team’s perspective, they’re saying we gave them one copy — what they did with it, we don’t know, but clearly it’s gotten out there and it’s not coming from us,” Lee reported. “They really want to distance themselves from the idea that he is somehow behind leaking this.”

Also on Monday, Bolton, his literary agent and publisher put out a joint statement denying any involvement in the media obtaining the manuscript.

​
“There was absolutely no coordination with The New York Times or anyone else regarding the appearance of information about his book, ‘The Room Where It Happened,’ at online booksellers,” the statement read. “Any assertion to the contrary is unfounded speculation.”
Dean Baquet, the executive editor of The New York Times also put out a statement.

He noted that, “The Times does not discuss its sources, but I should point out that no one has questioned the accuracy of our report.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/01/bo...the-single-manuscript-they-were-given-report/

​

 
Last edited:
not the "White House" it was sent to the NSC within the WH -and the NSC has been leaking.
So you support the NSC leaking? figures
 
The timing of this is so transparent it's laughable. When the defense is presenting it's case and just a week before the Senate decides if it will call witnesses. All of a sudden this top secret book no one has heard about materializes out of thin air.
 
Eagle-Eye said:
The timing of this is so transparent it's laughable. When the defense is presenting it's case and just a week before the Senate decides if it will call witnesses. All of a sudden this top secret book no one has heard about materializes out of thin air.
Click to expand...

Who HASN'T heard of this book and knew it was coming? For chrissakes, it was announced and speculated about daily SINCE OCT. It's like Bolton never left--because EVERYONE knew this book had the potential to blow up everything!!!!!

WTF kind of imbeciles are on this board? WTH kind of coma have you been in?

The ONLY THING I can attribute the ignorance to is FOX DIDN'T TALK ABOUT IT!
 
Originally Posted by Eagle-Eye
The timing of this is so transparent it's laughable. When the defense is presenting it's case and just a week before the Senate decides if it will call witnesses. All of a sudden this top secret book no one has heard about materializes out of thin air.


You'd laugh it off even if you selected the timing, traitor shithead.
Do you ever address substance, skull fucked loser?
 
Centerleftfl said:
Who HASN'T heard of this book and knew it was coming? For chrissakes, it was announced and speculated about daily SINCE OCT. It's like Bolton never left--because EVERYONE knew this book had the potential to blow up everything!!!!!

WTF kind of imbeciles are on this board? WTH kind of coma have you been in?

The ONLY THING I can attribute the ignorance to is FOX DIDN'T TALK ABOUT IT!
Click to expand...

It has? Perhaps you can link stories to it before it became a bomb shell. Then again I don't immerse myself in liberal publications like you do.
 
Micawber said:
Originally Posted by Eagle-Eye
The timing of this is so transparent it's laughable. When the defense is presenting it's case and just a week before the Senate decides if it will call witnesses. All of a sudden this top secret book no one has heard about materializes out of thin air.


You'd laugh it off even if you selected the timing, traitor shithead.
Do you ever address substance, skull fucked loser?
Click to expand...

dear fucking idiot

you didnt hear about it because you watch rightwing media


they LIE TO YOU IDIOT


THEY FAIL TO REPORT THINGS THAT HURT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY


THEY REPEATEDLY LABEL REPUBLICANS WHO GET CAUGHT DOING ILLEGAL SHIT AS DEMOCRATIC party members


you are a con mans dream target


fuck you very much
 
anatta said:
you idiot. The NSC are not supposed to be political. The WH "walled off"the manuscript so it couldn't see it.
Click to expand...

The National Security Council is made up of political appointees. It is meant to coordinate the presidents political strategies on foreign policy. They serve at the pleasure of the president.

Several white house trolls have commented on the book, so it clearly was not "walled off".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top