Liberals - Explain Why the State Media colluded to DEFEAT BERNIE SANDERS

I think it was a combination of the progressive movements in the democrat party of both civil rights and equal rights. Hillary was the darling of the women's rights and equality movement, and Bernie was a white male which went against the grain of the popular meme running around progressive circles that white men were the source of many problems. The civil-rights-focused democrats could never vote for a white guy! FuckDat!

The media is packed with liberal progressives and they proved it themselves with the level of bias they showed, with some figures even admitting they were biased. So the fact that they colluded with the democrats is not hard to believe.

Interesting to note: Democrats find Russian interference in the election to be a greater threat than American media outlets interference in the election. I think the media has a far greater influence than the Russians, but hey, what do I know? I mean it's not like the media has anything to profit from, right? LOL
 
noise said:
maybe not illegal, but def "improper"
to this day Dems that I know that were Bernie Bros still loathe the DNC
Click to expand...

Improper how?

It's been established that they did nothing improper.

People are allowed to have personal preferences. As long as the DNC took no direct action to sabotage Sanders' campaign, no harm - no foul.

Re: the butthurt BernBots... fuck those idiots. They're partly responsible for sticking us with the orange abomination.

So WE still loathe THEM.
 
Nomad said:
Improper how?

It's been established that they did nothing improper.

People are allowed to have personal preferences. As long as the DNC took no direct action to sabotage Sanders' campaign, no harm - no foul.

Re: the butthurt BernBots... fuck those idiots. They're partly responsible for sticking us with the orange abomination.

So WE still loathe THEM.
Click to expand...

Which means you still have an unresolved civil war in your party lol.
 
Darth Omar said:
Which means you still have an unresolved civil war in your party lol.
Click to expand...

Given that the Repugnants control both houses and the WH but can't even pass one law, I'd say so do you lol.

We've got the Progressives and BernBots, but you've got these morons...

david-williams-teabag.jpg
1000w.jpg

image6365032x.jpg


Teabagger_Feature-WPress.jpg
up-F43STNS530BNQ55G.jpg


I think you all have the bigger problem.

Lol.
 
I seem to recall a lot of shenanigans from the WikiLeaks,,
I was too busy LMAO to recall -but there was shady stuff
 
Nomad said:
They didn't.

You're just full of shit.
Click to expand...

ok pot kettle,

so I guess CNN's Donna Brazille feeding Hillary debate questions beforehand doesn't count,

And the assertion was the media in general, the DNC in general colluding to eliminate Bernie, if you didn't catch that then business as usual with you.
Get your head out of the sand, you're not an ostrich, you're a dodo bird
 
The Hillbag/Bernie primaries were a very close race. Bernie only needed 200 more votes to win. Clearly, the State Media collusion made the difference in the dem primary race.

Hillary supporters are still in denial :palm:
 
Getin the ring said:
ok pot kettle,

so I guess CNN's Donna Brazille feeding Hillary debate questions beforehand doesn't count,

And the assertion was the media in general, the DNC in general colluding to eliminate Bernie, if you didn't catch that then business as usual with you.
Get your head out of the sand, you're not an ostrich, you're a dodo bird
Click to expand...

Donna Brazille is one person. She is not "the media" as a whole.

At least Hillary wasn't colluding with the Kremlin like your commie-dick sucker clown was.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top