Last night's SNL opening segment...

aloysious said:
Dude, lighten up. I'm only making comparisons about humor not presidents. I remember SNL making fun of presidents since Reagan.
I don't think they touched Obama. Politically incorrect because, well you know.
Alec Baldwin will have a field day with Trump.
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter. You still missed the point.

Yes, they've made fun of several Presidents, but it started with Ford, who was POTUS when the show first aired in 1975, not Reagan. They even reached back as far as Nixon once or twice. But none of those Presidents were pilloried for being RUSSIAN PUPPETS. It was always assumed that whatever their other faults that were being lampooned, they were patriotic Americans to their cores.

Being a puppet for the Kremlin is the lowest thing, aside from a pedophile or a murderer, that a President or President Elect can be.

The idea of Trump being POTUS while sucking up to the Russian govt because he is business partners with them, represents an unprecedented, never before encountered depth of sleaze, conflict of interest and DISRESPECT FOR AMERICA.

If Trump loved and respected the USA, he'd sell off all of his business interests to outside, third parties not related to his family, stop engaging in any and all business activity, and concentrate SOLELY ON HIS JOB.

But he obviously does not.

The guy is a third rate, egomaniacal clown who isn't up to the level of dignity the office demands and the rubes who helped elect him are empty-headed fools with no class or dignity themselves.
 
Last edited:
Deplorable Me said:
Where will you be when Trump wins the black and hispanic votes?

On the dust heap of history. That's where.

Now go find a safety pin and snuggle puppy to 'fweel better'
Click to expand...

I'll be sitting here watching those winged pigs flying out of your butt.
 
Nomad said:
Trump will forever wear the stink of Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin.

The Republican Party now loves and respects Russia more than America.
Click to expand...

Hmmmmm... so ya think the sore loser Russian hack state run media propaganda TARD horse shit is much worse then a sitting Secretary of State arrangin' the sale of 20% of the USA's uranium for a pay fer play contribution to a sham charitable foundation?

I'd say yer TARD affliction has greatly diminished yer brain function, (if ya ever had brain function)... burp...
 
Nomad said:
You sound like someone who'd have an altar set up in your bedroom with candles and pictures of him that you worship and pray to.

Possibly even a poster of him taped to the ceiling above your bed.

Just to help you "get relaxed" before falling asleep.
Click to expand...

She was on Dumpster's wagon outta the hole.

I bet she has zero trouble sleepin' like a baby at night, as she is very happy with the result.

How do you sleep with the nasty case of TARD you have?
 
Nomad said:
Doesn't matter. You still missed the point.

Yes, they've made fun of several Presidents, but it started with Ford, who was POTUS when the show first aired in 1975, not Reagan. They even reached back as far as Nixon once or twice. But none of those Presidents were pilloried for being RUSSIAN PUPPETS. It was always assumed that whatever their other faults that were being lampooned, they were patriotic Americans to their cores.

Being a puppet for the Kremlin is the lowest thing, aside from a pedophile or a murderer, that a President or President Elect can be.

The idea of Trump being POTUS while sucking up to the Russian govt because he is business partners with them, represents an unprecedented, never before encountered depth of sleaze, conflict of interest and DISRESPECT FOR AMERICA.

If Trump loved and respected the USA, he'd sell off all of his business interests to outside, third parties not related to his family, stop engaging in any and all business activity, and concentrate SOLELY ON HIS JOB.

But he obviously does not.

The guy is a third rate, egomaniacal clown who isn't up to the level of dignity the office demands and the rubes who helped elect him are empty-headed fools with no class or dignity themselves.
Click to expand...

Do you actually think the state run media's propaganda is believed by people who aren't Liberal/Progressive/Marxist/Statist/Fascist termites? burp...
 
OldMercsRule said:
Hmmmmm... so ya think the sore loser Russian hack state run media propaganda TARD horse shit is much worse then a sitting Secretary of State arrangin' the sale of 20% of the USA's uranium for a pay fer play contribution to a sham charitable foundation?

I'd say yer TARD affliction has greatly diminished yer brain function, (if ya ever had brain function)... burp...
Click to expand...

What I think is that you are just another run of the mill, garden variety, lying right-wing hack who pukes talking points in lieu of thinking for yourself or taking the time and effort to get your facts straight...

From snopes:

"Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can't veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself "never intervened" in committee matters.

The timing of most of the donations does not match

Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion's share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company's founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state."

And, all that aside... the Clintons have never been alleged to have pocketed money donated to their foundation, which itself is one of the most highly rated charitable foundations in the world. If you possessed even the tiniest grain or speck of honesty, you would not confuse the way the Clintons run their foundation with the way Slump runs his... like taking contributions to pay for a life sized portrait of himself, etc.

You're probably a lot like Trump in that, even if you had all his money at your disposal, neither one of you could buy any class.
 
Nomad said:
What I think is that you are just another run of the mill, garden variety, lying right-wing hack who pukes talking points in lieu of thinking for yourself or taking the time and effort to get your facts straight...

From snopes:

"Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can't veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself "never intervened" in committee matters.

The timing of most of the donations does not match

Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion's share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company's founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state."

And, all that aside... the Clintons have never been alleged to have pocketed money donated to their foundation, which itself is one of the most highly rated charitable foundations in the world. If you possessed even the tiniest grain or speck of honesty, you would not confuse the way the Clintons run their foundation with the way Slump runs his... like taking contributions to pay for a life sized portrait of himself, etc.

You're probably a lot like Trump in that, even if you had all his money at your disposal, neither one of you could buy any class.
Click to expand...

Lets all hope Jeff Sessions appoints a special prosecutor ta look into the Clinton crime family's foundation...

Lock her up... burp...
 
I was waiting, but no Twitter tantrum over SNL this week?

Could it be Trump was embarrassed by his last one?
 
OldMercsRule said:
Lets all hope Jeff Sessions appoints a special prosecutor ta look into the Clinton crime family's foundation...

Lock her up... burp...
Click to expand...

Right.

Let's see how many more millions of tax dollars the idiot GOP can waste investigating the Clintons just to satisfy their stupid, rightwing retard base.

Good plan, Uncle Jed.
 
Jarod said:
I was waiting, but no Twitter tantrum over SNL this week?

Could it be Trump was embarrassed by his last one?
Click to expand...

I hope they not only keep it up, but escalate it.

I hope they skewer and ridicule that fucking phony-ass pretender to the point his head literally explodes.
 
the republicans that were in office under Bush investigated nothing


it was a derth of investigation like no other time in this country
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top