I voted no because I belvie that in general they do not, there is a fringe group that does, but the way the question was worded indicated that they as a group do, and I disagree.
..."We don't know why the Tucson killer did what he did.
If he is like Sirhan, we'll never "understand."
But we know that it has been a time of extreme, implicitly violent political rhetoric and imagery, including SarahPac's famous bulls-eye map of 20 Congressional targets to be removed -- including Rep. Giffords.
It is legitimate to discuss whether there is a connection between that tone and actual outbursts of violence, whatever the motivations of this killer turn out to be.
At a minimum, it will be harder for anyone to talk -- on rallies, on cable TV, in ads -- about "eliminating" opponents, or to bring rifles to political meetings, or to say "don't retreat, reload..."
I voted no because I belvie that in general they do not, there is a fringe group that does, but the way the question was worded indicated that they as a group do, and I disagree.
..."Alarm around tea party protests cropped up last year when tea partiers began showing up armed. One much-publicized incident involved a man who carried a high-powered rifle to an anti-Obama rally close to where the president was speaking in Phoenix..."
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.