Just a thought...

But the Shooter will discover soon enough that when he leaves after sixteen years in the Navy, his body filled with scar tissue, arthritis, tendonitis, eye damage, and blown disks, here is what he gets from his employer and a grateful nation:

Nothing. No pension, no health care, and no protection for himself or his family.

Not true. He'll receive a lifetime of care from the VA, along with either disability or a pension.

I appreciate his service and sacrifice, but as a member of ST6 he knew what he was getting in. I'm not being critical at all.
 
Not true. He'll receive a lifetime of care from the VA, along with either disability or a pension.

I appreciate his service and sacrifice, but as a member of ST6 he knew what he was getting in. I'm not being critical at all.

Having not served myself, are you sure about his pension? I would think he would know.

That said... do you think they should split up the reward? Is that not the least we can do?
 
Having not served myself, are you sure about his pension? I would think he would know.

That said... do you think they should split up the reward? Is that not the least we can do?

He could have stayed in for three more years and got his retirement pension, he left after 17, he gets no pension.
 
Not true. He'll receive a lifetime of care from the VA, along with either disability or a pension.

I appreciate his service and sacrifice, but as a member of ST6 he knew what he was getting in. I'm not being critical at all.

It's already been reported that he gets no pension; because he left 4 years early.
 
You're wrong, Howey. You don't get retirement pay unless you stay. He left early, he doesn't get it. That I called it "pension" so the civilians would get it doesn't change that. The reality is, he isn't getting paid, and it was because he got out before he could retire.
 
Wrong and wrong. Y'all talking about retirement.

Pension is different.

Someday you'll learn I'm always right. Sheesh. :)

Read all that I wrote, bitch.
I said that was what was reported and it's even in the beginning article.

"...But the Shooter will discover soon enough that when he leaves after sixteen years in the Navy, his body filled with scar tissue, arthritis, tendonitis, eye damage, and blown disks, here is what he gets from his employer and a grateful nation:

Nothing. No pension, no health care, and no protection for himself or his family..."


So now the man himself lied!
 
So now the man himself lied!

Yes he did. As a wartime veteran he is eligible for VA pension and if his injuries are service-related, VA compensation for disability and treatment for those injuries at a VA Hospital.

Now prove me wrong. You can't.

And Damo? You're as much a word-parsing fool as Yurtroll.

Changing the word to pension instead of retirement so the uneducated peon civilians would understand?

Lol.
 
You're wrong, Howey. You don't get retirement pay unless you stay. He left early, he doesn't get it. That I called it "pension" so the civilians would get it doesn't change that. The reality is, he isn't getting paid, and it was because he got out before he could retire.
Well if he went in when he was 18, that would make him 35 meaning that unless he's disabled he has 32 years left to his working carreer. If he's disabled via his military service would he not be eligible for a VA pension?
 
From some left wing rag called the Stars and Stripes

Esquire magazine claims “The Man Who Killed Osama bin Laden ... Is Screwed.”

The story details the life of the Navy SEAL after the successful raid to take out the No. 1 terrorist, and it asserts that once the SEAL got out of the military he was left to fend for himself.

“...here is what he gets from his employer and a grateful nation:

Nothing. No pension, no health care, and no protection for himself or his family.”

Except the claim about health care is wrong. And no servicemember who does less than 20 years gets a pension, unless he has to medically retire.

Like every combat veteran of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the former SEAL, who is identified in the story only as “the Shooter”, is automatically eligible for five years of free healthcare through the Department of Veterans Affairs.

But the story doesn’t mention that.

The writer, Phil Bronstein, who heads up the Center for Investigative Reporting, stands by the story. He said the assertion that the government gave the SEAL “nothing” in terms of health care is both fair and accurate, because the SEAL didn’t know the VA benefits existed.

“No one ever told him that this is available,” Bronstein said.

He said there wasn’t space in the article to explain that the former SEAL’s lack of healthcare was driven by an ignorance of the benefits to which he is entitled.

“That’s a different story,” Bronstein said in a phone interview with Stars and Stripes about what he omitted from the article.

The Center for Investigating Reporting posted a story on its website today that goes into greater detail about the SEAL's interactions with the VA, including that he has a disability claim that is stuck in the backlog.

Esquire magazine has not yet responded to a request for comment.

The story’s claims are getting a lot of buzz - The Washington Post picked up the detail about the SEAL's healthcare situation - disconcerting veteran advocates like Brandon Friedman, who served as an Army infantry officer in Iraq and Afghanistan and used to be a VA public affairs officer.

“Misinformation like this doesn’t help veterans,” he said. “When one veteran hears in a high-profile story that another veteran was denied care, it makes him or her less likely to enroll in the VA system.”

Y'all can apologize now.
 
Last edited:
Yes he did. As a wartime veteran he is eligible for VA pension and if his injuries are service-related, VA compensation for disability and treatment for those injuries at a VA Hospital.
Again, incorrect. In order to receive that pension he must meet requirements...

http://benefits.va.gov/PENSIONANDFIDUCIARY/pension/vetpen.asp

In addition to meeting minimum service requirements, the Veteran must be:

Age 65 or older, OR
Totally and permanently disabled, OR
A patient in a nursing home receiving skilled nursing care, OR
Receiving Social Security Disability Insurance, OR
Receiving Supplemental Security Income

Now prove me wrong. You can't.
Did.

And Damo? You're as much a word-parsing fool as Yurtroll.

Changing the word to pension instead of retirement so the uneducated peon civilians would understand?

Lol.
Yet I was right and you were wrong. He isn't disabled, he doesn't meet the requirements for Veterans Pension, and won't until he is 65 and/or meets the other requirements.

He can't receive retirement and doesn't meet the requirements to receive Veterans Pension.
 
Back
Top