Judge rules Jen Psaki must be deposed in lawsuit over 'collusion' with Big Tech

ExpressLane

Verified User
Judge rules Jen Psaki must be deposed in lawsuit over alleged 'collusion' with Big Tech to censor speech
A federal judge ruled Monday that former White House press secretary Jen Psaki must comply with a subpoena and offer deposition in a lawsuit that claims the Biden administration colluded with Big Tech to censor speech.

Judge Terry Doughty of the Western District of Louisiana on Monday rejected a motion by attorneys for Psaki to block a court-ordered deposition, and said there is public interest in "determining whether First Amendment free speech rights have been suppressed."

Monday’s order follows a ruling from U.S. Magistrate Judge Ivan Davis, who on Friday transferred the case back to Louisiana after Psaki attempted to fight the deposition in a Virginia court where she lives and would be deposed. Biden’s Justice Department supported her effort"Ms. Psaki’s effort to eliminate or delay her deposition in this action had failed because of the swift action of two judges in widely dispersed courts, one in Virginia and one in Louisiana, and by the implausibility of her reasons for not testifying as to Federal efforts to censure social media that made quick resolution possible," John J. Vecchione, senior counsel for the New Civil Liberties Alliance, said in a press statement. NCLA supports the lawsuit against Psaki.
Republican Attorneys General Eric Schmitt of Missouri and Jeff Landry of Louisiana first filed the lawsuit in May, accusing top-ranking government officials of working with the giant social media companies Meta, Twitter and YouTube "under the guise of combating misinformation" in order to achieve greater censorship.............

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ju...tion-lawsuit-collusion-big-tech-censor-speech

====================================

Good we shall see if she will lie under oath like she use to lie for the White House. This could get interesting. :thisisgettinggood:
 
Good we shall see if she will lie under oath like she use to lie for the White House. This could get interesting. :thisisgettinggood:

If 2 judges say someone should sit for a deposition then your opinion is they should sit for it and not appeal?
I would love to see your posts on Trump, Graham, Clark, Bannon, Jordan and every other Republican that is fighting sitting for depositions or providing testimomy after 2 judges ruled they were supposed to.
 
If 2 judges say someone should sit for a deposition then your opinion is they should sit for it and not appeal?
I would love to see your posts on Trump, Graham, Clark, Bannon, Jordan and every other Republican that is fighting sitting for depositions or providing testimomy after 2 judges ruled they were supposed to.
Oh she can appeal but it is doubtful she will be successful. She is 0-2 already. Nice Whataboutism! Did YOU want Trump, Graham, Clark, Bannon, to escape giving depositions?
 
Last edited:
Oh she can appeal but it is doubtful she will be successful. She is 2-2 already. Nice Whataboutism! Did YOU want Trump, Graham, Clark, Bannon, to escape giving depositions?

When did I say Psaki shouldn't be deposed? You are the one being hypocritical. Graham is still fighting it after losing to 2 judges and the appeal. Trump is still fighting after losing to 12 judges and 4 appeals.
 
Oh she can appeal but it is doubtful she will be successful. She is 2-2 already. Nice Whataboutism! Did YOU want Trump, Graham, Clark, Bannon, to escape giving depositions?

Not really 2-2, one ruled she had to appear, the other that she can’t move the case to Virginia where she lives, not really one confirming the decision of the other.

And I’d wager she’ll appear in some format, answer questions, and move on, the case is on shaky grounds, we all know the next to impossible task of legally proving a conspiracy
 
When did I say Psaki shouldn't be deposed? You are the one being hypocritical. Graham is still fighting it after losing to 2 judges and the appeal. Trump is still fighting after losing to 12 judges and 4 appeals.

Trumpers, Pedo Nazis, White Nationalists and other extremists are always hypocrites. I've never seen one who didn't turn out to be one.
 
Amazing how every time Trump gets investigated by any Congressional Body or legal authority, Trump may squiggle free by delaying everything with lawsuits that never go his way- BUT SOMEONE ALWAYS GOES TO JAIL IN EVERY INVESTIGATION OF HIM SO FAR!

NOW WATCH AND SEE HOW MANY DEMOCRATS GO TO JAIL AFTER ALL THE REPUBLICAN WITCH TRIALS ARE OVER- COMING UP!

NONE- OF COURSE!

Republicans like to point the finger- AND THE DEMOCRATS LOVE TO JUST GIVE THEM A LITTLE TASTE OF THEIR OWN FINGER BACK FOR BEING SUCH PETTY LYING UNSCRUPULOUS BASTARDS!!

Here you go! We got your finger right here!

wind-up-middle-finger.gif
 
Last edited:
Not really 2-2, one ruled she had to appear, the other that she can’t move the case to Virginia where she lives, not really one confirming the decision of the other.

And I’d wager she’ll appear in some format, answer questions, and move on, the case is on shaky grounds, we all know the next to impossible task of legally proving a conspiracy

The Democrat party IS a conspiracy.
 
Amazing how every time Trump gets investigated by any Congressional Body or legal authority, Trump may squiggle free by delaying everything with lawsuits that never go his way- BUT SOMEONE ALWAYS GOES TO JAIL IN EVERY INVESTIGATION OF HIM SO FAR!

NOW WATCH AND SEE HOW MANY DEMOCRATS GO TO JAIL AFTER ALL THE REPUBLICAN WITCH TRIALS ARE OVER- COMING UP!

NONE- OF COURSE!

Republicans like to point the finger- AND THE DEMOCRATS LOVE TO JUST GIVE THEM A LITTLE TASTE OF THEIR OWN FINGER BACK FOR BEING SUCH PETTY LYING UNSCRUPULOUS BASTARDS!!

Here you go! We got your finger right here!

wind-up-middle-finger.gif

Void argument fallacies. False equivalence fallacy.
 
Oh she can appeal but it is doubtful she will be successful. She is 2-2 already. Nice Whataboutism! Did YOU want Trump, Graham, Clark, Bannon, to escape giving depositions?

Why should she bother, the list of republicans subpoena for testimony, and refused to appear before the 1/6 committee is long
 
The Repubs have shown there is no reason to respond to courts or committees. The law no longer applies to politicians. The fact is the Dems will still follow the law. The Repubs will not.
 
If 2 judges say someone should sit for a deposition then your opinion is they should sit for it and not appeal?
I would love to see your posts on Trump, Graham, Clark, Bannon, Jordan and every other Republican that is fighting sitting for depositions or providing testimomy after 2 judges ruled they were supposed to.
Yes. The OP made me immediately think of the question you pose.
 
Back
Top