You ignorant ass, it was not vacated, it was merely halted. This is a regional district court, his opinion does not hold sway over anything but his district. If another district goes against him, his order only applies to his district and I am surprised he thinks his order applies across the nation.
Will be interesting to see how this plays out.
As much as YaYurt the trumptard wants to defend his orange masters order, he is lying. The EO is halted nationally...
It was a FEDERAL judge...
You don't shit about how the federal judicial system works, do you?
I find it humorous how your troll ass continues to say I have to defend him when I keep posting threads, and posts against him. You're nothing but a troll. Thingy bans me because he claims I'm like you, yet, he goes into my threads and other threads and we have good conversations. You? Never, you're just a shit troll.
GFY
YaYurt1828223 said:Yeah, you don't know anything about how the federal judicial system works.
Good night sweet pea.
The TRO would not have been ordered if there was any chance they would lose...
Absolutely; because as we all know, the Supreme Court has never overturned anything from a lower court.
This will NOT go 4 to 4...
This EO is in violation of some pretty basic constitutional premise...
The racist bigots have been stopped by the constitution...
Trump, Bannon and Flynn have been stopped...
This will NOT go 4 to 4...
This EO is in violation of some pretty basic constitutional premise...
The racist bigots have been stopped by the constitution...
Trump, Bannon and Flynn have been stopped...
"You ignorant ass, it was not vacated, it was merely halted. This is a regional district court, his opinion does not hold sway over anything but his district. If another district goes against him, his order only applies to his district and I am surprised he thinks his order applies across the nation.
Will be interesting to see how this plays out." Y #3
We don't need the disparaging ad hom, but thanks at least for distinguishing between stupidity and ignorance.
" his opinion does not hold sway over anything but his district "
It's an important point, and nearly true.
That judicial district may limit that judge's jurisdiction.
BUT !!
Stare Decisis applies to the entire nation.
If that judge's action stands in that one district, why could it not then be cited as precedent in any other judicial district in the country, at that level and purpose?
What is the Constitutional premise? Please be specific.
Are you one of those hypocrites who always demands others be specific and then just spouts platitudes and right wing tropes recited by your orange master, never grappling with specific facts yourself?
I don't have the filing or the TRO application or declarations in support, but I can guess one ground would be the executive order overruling the act of Congress, a coequal branch with province over lawmaking, and which afforded immigrant political refugees legal rights to asylum in the USA.
Trump didn't help himself by declaring that Christian refugees would be given preference.