Judge: GOP voter purge illegal

Status
Not open for further replies.
the GOP was sued for doing this in the 80s too and lost. They know it's illegal, but they keep doing it anyway.
 
They have even broken the law in breaking the court order to cease these actions they agreed to in those cases.
 
Im so fucking sick of this double standard.

This should be all over the news instead of the fucking Acorn no there there story.
 
This should be front page news.

It won't be. This is actual voter fraud that prevents lawful voters from casting votes. The GOPers and the media only care if Mickey Mouse was registered to vote even though Mickey Mouse will never actually show up to vote on election day. You know, stuff that doesn't matter.
 
Which could happen due to a typo, inabilty to clearly read the registration etc.
There are quite a few reasons it can happen. Some places C.R. 29 may be listed 'mail-wise' as something like St Rte 29 SE... And if it was written wrong you sometimes get your mail back.
 
Judge: Mich. can't reject voters with bad address
10/13/2008, 3:57 p.m. EDT
The Associated Press

DETROIT (AP) — A judge has ordered Michigan election officials to stop automatically canceling a voter's registration if the card is returned as undeliverable.

Federal Judge Stephen Murphy in Detroit ruled Monday in a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and a group representing college students.

More than 1,400 voters in that category have been disqualified so far in 2008. The judge says it's unclear how many cancelations actually are wrong but it's a violation of federal law.
 
http://www.nationalcampaignforfairelections.org/issues_item/voter_caging/

The republican has done this repetedly Stir and been caught and they are doing it again and a JUDGE stopped them.



Caging’s Origins

Minority-biased voter challenge laws originated shortly after the passage of the Fifteenth Amendment in 1869, which prohibited states from denying the right to vote on the basis of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. Voter caging, in particular, did not emerge on the election scene until 1958 when an initial voter caging operation was conducted in Arizona. Shortly thereafter, voter caging campaigns surfaced during the development of the Republican "Southern Strategy," in which the party attempted to garner the support of white voters through metaphoric appeals to "states rights." In 1964, the Republican National Committee (RNC) and state Republican parties conducted a nationwide voter caging campaign named "Operation Eagle Eye."

Caging changed from a national strategy to one largely isolated in the states during the 1980s. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) filed suit against the RNC in the New Jersey District Court accusing them of violating the constitutional right of African-American and Hispanic voters through their caging campaign in 1981. In a settlement, the RNC entered into a consent decree stating they would:

"Refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose."

This consent decree was modified in 1986 after another attempted caging campaign in Louisiana. The modified decree required the RNC to obtain approval from the District Court before embarking on any "ballot security program" (the term the RNC used for their caging efforts), and required them to give the DNC 20 days notice before launching any future "ballot security program." Due to the lax enforcement of these decrees, and the fact that they were only applicable to the national Republican Party, voter caging continued into the early 1990s and re-emerged as a nationwide political strategy in 2004.

Before and since 1958, many of the same discriminatory motives that precipitated the passage of the Fifteenth Amendment remain apparent today.
 
This is an entirely different case than the other one I posted.

We have a PROVEN pattern here folks.
 
is ACORN the GOP ya retard. Your hurting democrats by being so stupid and sitting on your butt nor working.
 
Toppled spin,

are you confused little man?

the GOP has now been proven to have partaken in Illegal voter suppression in two states by two separate courts and two separate Judges, at least one of them is a republican.

ACORN is accused of voter registration mistakes.

There is a vast differance between accusations( which BTW also took place in the 2004 election and guess what ? they turned out to be innocent) and courts and judges determining you are GUILTY!!!!!

Maybe someday you will grow enough braincells to understand all of this?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top